Jump to content

Mr. Scot

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    137,857
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mr. Scot

  1. 5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

    You basically telling me you don't care what players accomplished in the past.

    What you think players get signed for in FA?

    You think we signed Thelien for his upside?

    You sound crazy my guy in the most respectful way possible.

    He's correct.

    Players aren't signed for what they've done, but for what it's believed they will do. Past success can be used as a gauge but NFL executives know the phrase "past performance does not guarantee of future success" very well.

    New contracts aren't a reward, they're an investment.

  2. 44 minutes ago, MrBubba said:

    I would imagine if Reich and Fitt are on same page, Tepper agrees.  However if they split on choice Tepper might get involved.  

    I'm not sure they'd need him to.

    They've got Morgan, Caldwell, Brown, Capers and several other voices on staff more qualified to offer input than Tepper.

  3. 2 minutes ago, Carolina Disaster said:

    He definitely is no Vick but he is a better athlete than he gets credit for.  He wasn't asked to run at OSU.  He didn't need to until the Georgia game.  He isn't going to blow the doors off like Vick, Lamar, etc but he is able to extend plays when needed.  

    To be fair, that describes a pretty good number of quarterbacks in the league right now.

    • Beer 1
  4. Just now, Jackie Lee said:

    I think that was when we were picking at 9 and it was potentially AR vs Levis. I'm guessing most of the AR guys are Stroud guys now that we've moved up. 

    Is Stroud really that great an athlete though?

    Based on what I've seen, I don't really think anybody is mistaking him for Michael Vick 😕

  5. 5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

    I think it's just that there are two really good, much more polished QBs available. Stroud and Young aren't Gabbert and Locker.

    There is a certain physical element to that debate, but it's not about athleticism. It's about durability.

    Young is as good a quarterback as I've seen in a long time. Stroud has the intelligence, accuracy and processing ability that I look for too, though.

    The difference id I don't feel like I'd be holding my breath every time Stroud took a hit.

    • Pie 2
    • Beer 1
  6. 16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

    Richardson's talent level is off the charts but drafting him ahead of Young or Stroud would take gigantic balls and there's a good chance it goes wrong. Then again, if he has what it takes and develops... oh wee mayne. You could be passing on a great one.

    I'm honestly glad it's not my call. I can fully understand the arguments for and against all of these guys. I think Young is the best QB right now. I think Stroud is probably the safest pick. Richardson is the grand slam or embarrassing strikeout. I honestly can't see that one going any other way.

    In the past, we've had a fairly vocal crowd supporting the idea of "take the superior athlete and teach him how to quarterback" (maybe because people were big fans of Cam Newton) but it feels like that crowd has either lost some members or simply grown silent.

    I've always been in the "take the guy with the superior quarterbacking skills regardless of whether he's the best athlete" camp myself. Most signs seem to point to the Panthers going that route with their QB pick, so I'm certainly not complaining.

    There are definitely some sports fans who'd rather lose an exciting game than win a slow and steady one. That's the bunch that continuously calls on the team to make big moves and swing for the fences every time. And yes, that might be a lot of fun to watch...

    ...but it's not always the smart play.

    • Pie 4
    • Beer 2
  7. 1 minute ago, Soul Rebel said:

    It's so crazy to imagine it any other way. 

    Owner - pays the bills and has input in decisions, but does not decide per se

    GM - key decision maker. walks the tightrope between coaching/players/personnel (Reich, coordinators, players), the directors and behind the scenes guys (Morgan, Suleimann, etc.) and the Owner

    HC - runs the on-field product and runs up to the GM his vision/requests/design needs. Works hand-in-hand with GM and has input into decisions.

    In the vast majority of successful NFL franchises, this is exactly how it works.

    And yeah, it does sound like Tepper wound up eating a healthy dose of humble pie after his first few years in the league.

  8. 13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

    Even if we know who we want there's zero competitive advantage to letting that be known right now and the NFL would greatly prefer to keep some intrigue to the #1 overall pick for viewership.

    I honestly think they're telling the truth.

    This is an extremely careful bunch. They're not going to jump to conclusions. The eise thing is to wring every ounce of information they can out of the process before coming down on a final decision.

    I'd guess they have leanings (Breer mentioned that) but the final decision is yet to come.

    And I've got no issue with that. It's a smart way to go.

    • Pie 2
  9. From the latest MMQB (Link)

    The Panthers’ traveling party does have one more stop on its quarterbacking tour, and that’ll happen with owners David and Nicole Tepper leading a group from Phoenix to Gainesvlle on Wednesday. I’d expect, like they did for the other three pro days, for the Teppers, GM Scott Fitterer, coach Frank Reich, and the rest of them to have dinner with Richardson on Wednesday night ahead of his throwing session Friday at UF.

    And, honestly, I think this is part of the benefit you get in doing the deal to move up early if you’re the Panthers. There’s no hiding your intentions. You just send everyone and get everyone’s opinion on each of the quarterbacks—with the Teppers bringing a different perspective to the conversation than, say, Fitterer or Reich would.

    This is a massive decision for the franchise, the kind where a GM and coach get their job security tethered to the fortunes of a single player. So this, in my mind, is how it should look. All hands on deck.

    While we’re here, I would say the consensus I’ve gotten from teams, and guys who were on the ground at the pro days, is it looks like Young and Stroud are, for now, on one tier, with Levis and Richardson, who don’t have the tape that the other two do and need more work mechanically, on another.

    “In my opinion, it’s a real tough choice between Bryce and C.J.,” says one coach who was at all three pro days. “They’re both outstanding. If you’re concerned about size, C.J.’s probably a safer pick? And Will looked fine, [but] I think he’s a notch or two below the others. … The other two are more natural throwers and have put better stuff on tape.”

    “Stroud’s personality came out more interacting with his teammates, and his natural arm strength was tremendous,” says another coach. “Young’s performance was as good as it gets, and he’s such a natural in front of everyone. His accuracy, anticipation, along with throwing catchable balls, as good as it gets.”

    • Pie 2
    • Beer 1
×
×
  • Create New...