-
Content Count
107,060 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
72,915 Fuggin AwesomeAbout Mr. Scot
- Currently Viewing Forum: Carolina Panthers
-
Rank
HUDDLE LORD
- Birthday 03/23/1967
Recent Profile Visitors
96,801 profile views
-
Colin Cowherd: Matt Kalil and Sam Darnold
Mr. Scot replied to DaveThePanther2008's topic in Carolina Panthers
It wasn't Matt. It was Ryan. Cowherd got the name wrong. -
D Watson’s attorney. A familiar name in NFL cases
Mr. Scot replied to raleigh-panther's topic in Carolina Panthers
Of all the idiotic things to spam a football message board about... -
Panthers Well Represented at Fields 2nd Pro Day
Mr. Scot replied to ncfan's topic in Carolina Panthers
That I can understand, but yeah, 2012. As far as others taken outside the first, Derek Carr is probably the best. -
As for me, I don't necessarily have specific players in mind so much as positions (at least in the first). Obviously, in the first round I want offensive line. Anything that isn't that, not so much.
-
I think your crystal ball might need some cleaning.
-
Panthers Well Represented at Fields 2nd Pro Day
Mr. Scot replied to ncfan's topic in Carolina Panthers
How could you not remember Wilson, man? That guy's been a pain in our ass for years. -
-
Panthers Well Represented at Fields 2nd Pro Day
Mr. Scot replied to ncfan's topic in Carolina Panthers
Seriously, dude? There's also that guy in Tampa. -
Fans have been trying to get him on the Panthers for years.
-
Grigson's just one convenient example. There are plenty of teams that have added skill players while half-assing the offensive line. One of them currently has a very disgruntled quarterback because of it. And yes, the fact that we got our GM from that team does worry me a little.
-
Panthers Well Represented at Fields 2nd Pro Day
Mr. Scot replied to ncfan's topic in Carolina Panthers
It allows that the Panthers could draft Fields and allow he and Darnold to compete for the starting job. But this... Giving up three draft picks, although not a huge haul, are still three draft picks at the end of the day. You don't just give that kind of draft capital for a guy you hope can be the answer and maybe be a backup to the guy you draft in the first round. That's a type of move that shows you have confidence in the player that you're trading for. ... directly contradicts this: We got Darnold because there was significant doubt Fields will be there at 8. We went -
Panthers Well Represented at Fields 2nd Pro Day
Mr. Scot replied to ncfan's topic in Carolina Panthers
The article you linked in the next post contradicts your take on Darnold. Quoting: The real question is: does it make sense to still take a quarterback? Giving up three draft picks, although not a huge haul, are still three draft picks at the end of the day. You don't just give that kind of draft capital for a guy you hope can be the answer and maybe be a backup to the guy you draft in the first round. That's a type of move that shows you have confidence in the player that you're trading for. Could this just be the Panthers bluffing to get teams from behind them to trade up int -
I guess it's a better nickname than "guy who's been overrated for years because of one big college highlight". Not that Clowney isn't good, but he's never been as good as the hype that's surrounded him.
-
I don't really want either one. I remember everyone cheering when Ryan Grigson and the Colts kept drafting weapons for Andrew Luck while ignoring the offensive line. People were wishing we used that approach. Look what happened there.
-
The Browns and Clowney finally came to an agreement on a one-year deal for $10 million.