frankw

3 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

Taller than Murray I think, but he’s like 15 lbs lighter. Which is a bigger issue. So no. Hard pass

17 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

From cbs sports line 

NFL MOCK DRAFT

Round 1

 

 

Mock Trade from Chicago Bears Round 1 - Pick 1     Bryce Young QB ALABAMA • JR • 6'0" / 194 LBS PROJECTED TEAM Carolina PROSPECT RNK 3rd POSITION RNK 1st   Carolina traded up to No. 3 overall and then to No. 1 overall. It is a similar model that Philadelphia used to select Carson Wentz in 2016. Philadelphia sent players, including Kiko Alonso and the No. 13 overall selection to Miami in exchange for the No. 8 overall selection. Then, it flipped that to Cleveland for the No. 2 overall selection. With the No. 1 overall selection, the Panthers select Bryce Young.

Round 1 - Pick 2     C.J. Stroud QB OHIO STATE • JR • 6'3" / 218 LBS PROJECTED TEAM Houston PROSPECT RNK 4th POSITION RNK 2nd   Houston does not get its pick of quarterback at No. 2 overall, but C.J. Stroud could still prove to be an elite talent.

Mock Trade from Arizona Cardinals Round 1 - Pick 3       Will Anderson Jr. EDGE ALABAMA • JR • 6'4" / 243 LBS PROJECTED TEAM Chicago PROSPECT RNK 1st POSITION RNK 1st   Chicago attempts to upgrade its pass rush with the selection of Will Anderson Jr. The Bears want to move back from No. 1 overall without sacrificing the chance to select a top defensive talent like Jalen Carter or Anderson. A three-way trade with Carolina and Arizona makes that possible as the Cardinals trade back to pick up additional draft capital in Monti Ossenfort's first year.

Over Stroud?

He's shorter than even Kyler Murray.

Ok so I've been one of the more vocal people who wanted us to shoot our shot on Fields and but it's time to move on. Stroud is our best shot and you can get on board or hitch your wagon to Brissett or Carr or Corral. But pick one and leave Fields in the rearview.

9 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

36 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Who really cares about this? Why should anyone but Tepper care about this? All the manufactured outrage is hilarious. And if it's not manufactured, it's still hilarious. Get a grip!

"Why does anyone care about any of this?"

*continues to post about the team every single day 20+ times a day*

To Matt Rhule and the people who defended this guy tooth and nail: Fug you.

I won't believe it until the season begins and he isn't on a roster.

Well if Stroud is the pick and we give up a lot to get him ya'll can prepare for the microaggressions and assessing every minute detail of his game including his work ethic.

7 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Stretch of 6 games = 1 game?

 

I mean he sucked royal balls in that 1 game.  No doubt about it.

But Oldham's point was the other games as well.

I'm not going to stick my head in the sand and ignore the 100+ QB ratings he got (which is tantamount to a Miracle) in those 5 other games. (well technically he had an 85 rating in one of them which we won)

 

You can not want Sam Darnold back and still acknowledge he was decent  for us (save for the sh-tshow at New Orleans(which we won anyway). 

 

I'm ready to move on from him but not ready to ignore what I saw.

You followed this man to a new team I'm not expecting us to agree on this.

15 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Darnold was very good when he came back from IR.

I doubt they bring him back because the new HC will want his own guy, but that stretch of 6 games was the best QB play we've seen in a Panthers jersey for a number of years.

He had the worst single game passer rating in the history of our franchise to close the season against a mediocre Saints team starting Andy Dalton.

5 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I mean he even lost this game despite his all-star WR corps and getting out to a big lead.

I read that he's not even as highly thought of as Fields in Ohio.

If you don't like him then I'm sold on him.

Hopefully it ends in disaster.

Well hey that's progress I guess.

6 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

Whatever we do, we can't continue with Darnold. The guy could only complete 5 passes in a freakin dome in a meaningless game. And he isn't a rookie, this was his 5th year. I'm done with those types of stat lines. We shouldn't settle for that.

Yeah only wackos and trolls think Reich took the job here to settle for another year of Darnold in any role.

Press conferences don't mean much at all but there are still takeaways. This could work it could not who knows. But it is a breath of fresh air knowing we are at least trying to divert more of our resources to that side of the ball. Now go get the QB.

10 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Gettleman rebounded nicely from 2016 with the 2017 FA. 

Stroud.

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

not once did I use the word "bad" ... you came up with that on your own.

Well you certainly weren't suggesting their oline was good by hammering home your point about them giving up as many sacks as the Bengals. What other conclusion is there to be made? I'm getting the sense you are a bit of a Mahomes fan so I see where this is coming from downplaying the Eagles. Enjoy the game man.

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I am not sure why you feel this is an argument. I stated that the Eagles have given up the same amount of sacks as the Bengals. 44. The Eagles have given up the 11th most sacks in the NFL. They give up sacks.

However, you think thats my expertise... and suggest that PFF grades means this isnt true... this is a really weird debate.

I don't see anything weird about it you used sacks as a measure to say the Eagles oline is as bad as the Bengals oline but I think that was at minimum hyperbole. We can disagree though it's fine.

If anyone actually thought the Niners were going to wipe the floor with the Eagles and the Chiefs with Brock Purdy that's your own fault for believing in fairy tales. The Eagles were the more balanced team. Anyone with eyes could see that running their entire offense through McCaffrey was not built to last or enough to win it all against more well rounded teams.

17 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I dont know how PFF is going to tell that those sacks werent real... The eagles give up sacks... PFF isnt going to change that.

So you are saying your expertise is superior to that of PFF.

8 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

how does the stat around how many sacks the eagles oline gives up per game (2.59), the fact that them and the bengals gave up the exact same amount of sacks this year (44) AND the eagles 2nd best starting olineman was not able to lift his arm after the game....not able to help you with the bolded comment above?

What are the Bengals and Eagles PFF oline ranking for the season? Who besides Jones on the Chiefs DL is going to wreak havoc on that line though? I'll give you the Dickerson injury is a problem but you are using sacks and only sacks to rate their oline overall there's much more to it than that.

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-final-2022-nfl-offensive-line-rankings

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

read above.

So you are arguing both QB's are recovering from an injury but only one will be mostly healthy in two weeks? Chiefs have some banged up players too. I really cannot see any argument that puts the Eagles oline in the same breath as the Bengals oline. I feel at worst their line is around the middle of the pack. This matchup favors the Eagles overall unless they just don't show up. We shall see

18 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I really dont see a path where the Eagles win this game. However, any given Sunday.

Where are these takes coming from lol. Sure they could lay an egg but they are a very balanced and well coached team too.