Jump to content

MHS831

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    31,788
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MHS831

  1. 1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

    With the DBs, I see more role definition than positional these days, so tend to view value a bit differently there...Basically, there's better defined roles to focus on rather than what position is listed next to their profile.

    Those roles:

    1-The Outside Corner Group - obviously the highest valued DB 

    2-The Safety/Slot group - Higher-end safeties that can play slot/NB( I.E. It's the modern guy people want-- Hamilton, Branch, Pitre, Emman, the list goes on)  

    3-The smaller Nickel-only group.  Most of the time undersized guys that can't play outside -- the good ones end up out their 70% of the time these days with how much teams use 5/6DB sets.  

    4-The safety-only group 

     

    Regarding group 2: If you have a guy that runs in 2SH next to TM but then in a dime package be pulled into the slot so you can play Ransom/Scott back there, that's good value.   They really just play either spot at any given moment dependent on the matchup.  They allow for defenses to better disguise and make QBs think sideways.  

    Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, & Haulcy all fall into this group for me this year.  

     

    You know more about this than I do, so correct my logic.....II have a hunch that our pick is going to be Thieneman.  In round 2, the LB.  (Hill, Rodriguez, or Golday).  Then I see a DT.  Those are the positions we could use starters.  Everywhere else, we have starters (OT, C, CB,  WR or TE, arguably --our primary depth needs), will be day 3 picks

  2. 4 hours ago, rmoneyg35 said:

    That makes me wonder, how many starting tackles in the NFL and/or elite tackles have short arms?

    I feel like there’s probably lots of tackles that end up being drafted in later rounds because they had short arms or didn’t have the physical tools.  
     

    also why not draft a tackle in the later rounds that we could move to guard or center if they fail, instead of drafting a center? If we draft a center we know they aren’t going to play tackle but if you draft a tackle they could end up playing any of the 3 positions, look at BC for example. It feels like it’s a better decision to draft a tackle in later rounds than a center.

    I read that they don't like arms under 34", but I do not know.  I can say that I have followed OTs who were drafted and many get kicked inside.  Brady Christensen is one example. RTs seem to be more tolerant of shorter arms.  As much as it seems silly, there is a reason the short-armed prospects can't hack the outside.  

    For the 2026 NFL Draft, arm length is a critical talking point for offensive tackles, with 33 inches usually being the minimum threshold for teams. Notable top prospects include Monroe Freeling (34 3/4"), Blake Miller (34 1/4"), and Dametrious Crownover (35 3/8") having elite length, while Spencer Fano (32 1/8") is facing potential positional moves. 

    Top 2026 NFL Draft Tackle Arm Lengths (Combine Measurements)

    Monroe Freeling: 34 3/4"

    Blake Miller: 34 1/4"

    Dametrious Crownover: 35 3/8"

    Max Iheanachor: 33 7/8"

    Caleb Lomu: 33 3/8"

    Kadyn Proctor: 33 3/8"

    Francis Mauigoa: 33 1/4"

    Spencer Fano: 32 1/8"

    Markeel Bell: 36 3/8"

    Garrett DiGiorgio: 32 5/8"

    Trey Zuhn III: 32 1/2" 

    Key 2026 Measurements & Context

    The 33-inch Cutoff: Many teams consider 33 inches the minimum for NFL tackles, with sub-33 inch arms often leading to a move to guard.

    Spencer Fano's Case: Despite top-15 draft projections, Fano's 32 1/8" arms at the combine sparked debate about his long-term position, though he measured 32 7/8" at his pro day.

    High-Length Options: Markel Bell (36 3/8") is a standout for his length, while Dametrious Crownover (35 3/8") also boasts high-end measurements.

    Proctor's Perspective: Prospects like Kadyn Proctor acknowledge the talk but emphasize that elite film can overcome shorter measurements. 

    Olinemen I like late:  KY OT Farmer--has the arms but lacks the feet. will be a solid G imo.

    Parker II (Duke OT with sub 33 inch arms.  Smart with good feet--projects to center.  A smart, agile center is a nice thing.

    Zuhn III (Tex AM) is another T to C candidate.

    Of course, I think the Panthers will like traditional center Logan Jones (Iowa) because he is an experienced (50 starts) fit in a zone scheme.  

     

     

    • Pie 1
  3. This was about finding starters--not depth so much--It changed my approach.  I am more confused than before and that is because Morgan has done a helluva job.  

    In my mind, WR and Edge are back in the picture based on how I felt after this. 

    Could Smith-Wade make the move from nickel to safety?  According to the Observer, that is not out of the question:

    Key Details on Smith-Wade's Versatility:
    • Role: Primarily a nickel corner, but capable of playing outside corner and safety,
    • Performance: Displayed strong versatility during 2025 offseason workouts, making plays at safety during OTAs and minicamp, says Panthers.com.
    • High Football IQ: Noted for his intelligence and ability to make calls for the secondary.
    Smith-Wade's future with the Panthers may include playing safety to fill gaps in the secondary, say Panthers Wire and the Charlotte Observer.
     
    This is significant to me because the draft is pretty deep at nickel CB.
    • Pie 1
  4. DT/DE, Will LB, S

    RT, C

    I see TE sneaking into the fray, but we have drafted 3 TEs since 2021.  I think you let them develop (Sanders, Evans flashed at times), but I do not see an upgrade unless we draft TE by day 2.  We need too many other positions.  

    No, I don't believe the BPA rule is pure or always followed.  IF the draft was before free agency, then maybe.

    • Beer 2
  5. 3 minutes ago, strato said:

    I haven't changed from my first thought which was trade out of 19 down a few slots. Use the booty to move up in the second to get someone we want. 51 seems just a bit out of the zone. 

    At 19, you are right.  Move back, grab 2 day-2 players if that is the deal.  I might have a small list of players who might fall, but if they are all gone, get on the phone.

    • Beer 1
  6. 33 minutes ago, Basbear said:

    where do you put NT?

    I've having troubles with my list, its too fluid and the value is crushing me too.

    like, edge is back to the top even with Phillips..... or dare say a case of mine can be made... 

    I still feel panthers have WR on the bullseye...

    I have the same thought--almost identical.  However, take a look at Ohio State's Kayden McDonald.  I know he is listed as a NT, but the description of his play and his stats tell me that he can play up and down the line--dare I say it--like D. Brown.  

    image.png.4677540f58fdef09bed8c006d6dc375b.png

    I think he is a NT, but I also think he could play 3T.  

    This draft is so full of edge players and I see some on Days 2 and 3 that could be steals.  

    WR?  We need to be good enough beyond TMac to keep the focus off TMac.  We are not there yet--so I see it--

     

    • Pie 4
    • Beer 1
  7. I am thinking we draft a developmental swing T later than round 1 now.  I get the feeling that if we draft a T, and we will, it will be Moton's successor, not Ickey's.  A developmental guy maybe?  (World, Shelton, etc).  It is important that we do not appear to have given up on Ickey and they think it is too early to tell.  Drafting a LT is a 4-year commitment. 

    • Pie 2
  8. II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.  

    We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance.

    I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.  

    I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.  

    Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early.

    I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view.

    Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.  

    Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back.

    • DT
    • WILB
    • OT
    • OC
    • QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.  

     

     

    • Pie 1
×
×
  • Create New...