rayzor

You don't get a gold star for breaking news.... especially in the draft. All you get is banned. The only question is for how long.

I haven't been around much lately, but thanks to a shoulder surgery that has me sidelined from life for a while I will be.

That said, I am sore and grumpy and will probably still be. Just be warned. 

I don't care who I am or who you are.... Elite OT helps more than anything in this draft.

Sneaky bastard. Don't know he wants to get in a pissing match with tepper, though. 

Why would it possibly be an issue? I mean aside from tradition. If so...screw tradition. It really doesn't matter. Just as long as two players on the team don't have the same number, it shouldn't matter.

Total non-issue.

Eagles 2021

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've seen a lot of people say they could try Little at guard, but I just don't see it working.

Last year, he frequently looked lost. If somebody wasn't running right at him, he had no idea what to do.

I'm not sure Little trying to learn a new position, one that sometimes requires more complicated thinking than just "step back and block the pass rusher", is something that's going to work out.

I think it's just better to cut our losses. Trade him for cheap and let him be someone else's project. I liked him. And then he had to go and play and ruin it all.

At this point I would prefer OL throughout. I would not, however, "be against" drafting one of those two. 

acceptable draft strategy for this year: NBOL

(Nothing but OL)

No.

#1, 2, and 3 priority is to beef up that OL.

Give darnold a chance to ball in a much better situation with an OL that doesn't suck. If he works out, great  if he doesn't, keep searching but know that whatever QB you get will be protected.

The only non OL I want in this draft is Pitts, especially in the first couple days. And I would prefer big and brutal OL at that and a smart center.

1) Pitts> Sewell> Darrisaw

2) Little (if Pitts is the pick) > Vera-Tucker> Creed Humphrey

3) Quinn Meinerz > Aaron Banks

Taken with a grain of salt.

He'll definitely be a lot more interesting to watch than teddy.

26 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I'd be disappointed if we traded up 1 spot. 

It would be frustrating move but it may be a necessary one to get our guy.

Either we trade for it or someone else does and takes the available QB we have our eye on.

That's the only way it makes sense.

I would prefer we kept on sleeping through that one.

5 minutes ago, DeSim said:

Well that just means players are gonna be asking for more during contract negotiations, nothing much changes. 

Pretty much this.

11 hours ago, LegioX said:

We are always 2-3 years away from being a contender every year

Fixed

He'd be better and more interesting than teddy. Sure, why not? If we can't get who we want, throw him into the mix.

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Simms said that Mond is a better pure passer than Lawrence! 

Nutty, I know, but there is a possibility that lawrence might just be a bit overhyped. It happens.

No. Drafted because he interviewed well, nothing else.

and everyone responsible for drafting him is gone....so should he be.

On 3/26/2021 at 2:00 PM, Ricky Spanish said:

Anyone?

I can see us taking LT at 8 and then moving back into the late first to take him. 

Better or worse than Jones? Do we want this? Am I trying to convince myself things will work out?

hold me.

Kind of the second best thing we can hope for at this point (first best being Watson didn't do poo and gets cleared and we snag him...not likely). 

I like mond more than mac. Think he's got more room for growth and I think jimbo held him back. On top of that, while I think Chris Simms is a bit nutty with his QB rankings this year, I wasn't sold in his rankings in previous years and he turned out right about a lot of people. I'm skeptical,  but based on his history he's more likely to be right than wrong...and yes, that means I might also be wrong about mac and Simms might be right.