-
Posts
68,941 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by CRA
-
Bro is talking like it was a bullshit call and he didn’t appreciate his head coach blaming him for not doing something right. If the call is 4 yards behind….Chark was exactly that if you rewatch the play. Odd that Chark felt the need to bring up the exact depth he was supposed to be. Word traveled fast Frank was throwing folks under the bus.
-
Multiple things can be true Frank is a bad HC Fitterer is a bad GM and we have both because Tepper largely hires bad people. He doesn’t know what a good GM is. He doesn’t know what a good HC is. And a bad HC and bad GM clearly can’t work well with an involved owner.
-
Frank isn’t the first nor will he be the last to not get it his way on things. He also is just a bad HC. I think because he acts like he is on sedatives people ignore a lot of the Rhule-ish to him. like today. That was a horrible call at the end. Frank’s take? That should be a TD and Chark did a poor job. That’s seems like a pretty Matt Rhule-ish breakdown.
-
Wonder why they didn’t do a bubble screen there and instead actually attempted to win.
-
So this is what watching football is supposed to be like. It’s weird. Talent. Playmakers. Offense. Joe Brady can’t even get in the way of it.
-
Only point would be in regards to Bryce. Frank gets him murdered every game, likely is regressing and developing bad habits. Change could alter that. Especially if you went with an interim that preferred run heavy ball. of course, Tepper could just tell Frank to bench Bruce to protect whatever he thinks he has in Bryce. But that makes his investment look the worst. I want Fitterer gone first and foremost. That would appease me.
-
the check is part of the play. That’s on Frank. Not Bryce. end of the day everyone knew they would come for Bryce in that scenario. Frank called the play that obviously would be a screen. Because he knew if they show blitz the playcall becomes the screen. And only the worst DC in America wouldn’t have thrown the sink at Bryce there. And then Frank didn’t even have the right personnel in….with the game on the line for a weak ass screen.
-
The check is essentially going to be the playcall from the jump. Because everyone knew the Titans were going to come for Bryce in that scenario. If you hit it right?? Frank didn't even have the WR they plan they play for in. end of the day, game on the line, Frank called a BS screen…a WR that wasn’t designed for.
-
It’s still Frank’s playcall. The playcall says to throw the screen if they show blitz. Everyone in America knew the Titans would come and blitz Young there. If Frank didn’t think they would blitz Young heavy he should retire today. Frank then says if run well it’s a great play. Then says he didn’t even have the WR that normally runs it over there lol Clowns
-
game on the line. Screen. Glad Thomas Brown ain’t out there to fug that up
-
It’s a Frank Reich trademark. That knock always follows him
-
If Tenn could just commit a penalty every down we might can do something
-
Enough to field a complete starting lineup on O at this point
-
Tepper is here to stay. Many teams have bad owners. Just got to accept it and hope he hires a front office that can deal with him. Which means you go to hope he hires some people he won’t get along with that well.
-
Levis has crazy arm talent. He trends on the high end in that department. Bryce got the ole noodle. Too many plays are just off the table with Bryce when they present themselves.
-
I almost fell asleep watching this Clemson/USC with both teams channeling the Panthers O.
-
Jay Feely says Matt Rhule treated people "crappy" while in Carolina
CRA replied to Dorian Gray's topic in Carolina Panthers
I agree with my boss all the time at the end of the day. I mean that’s what it is in the end. That’s our decision. That’s going to be the narrative. Everyone that knew Frank was out there saying what a Frank QB was and wasn’t in that moment. And inside reporting said they were split. Someone wins. Someone loses. In the end they all agree on the pick. Every pick actually. They all universally agreed on every pick and got the guy they all agreed was at the top of their board (and they all agreed on their board) -
Sanders would average 50 a game here. Sacks taken that is. dude got some bad habits trying to keep the stat sheet as nice as possible
-
Offensive Schemes, Running Game & Blocking FYIs
CRA replied to Bear Hands's topic in Carolina Panthers
The best arugment someone could make in Fitterers favor….is he is completely powerless and has no ability to influence good decisions to ultimately occur. which just brings you right back to why he should be fired. He would be pointless. -
Offensive Schemes, Running Game & Blocking FYIs
CRA replied to Bear Hands's topic in Carolina Panthers
Well that’s sort of why I am attempting to highlight. You simply seek to claim everyone is wrong that hasn’t muttered whatever you do. That’s your fixation. And you will take all sorts of weird gymnastics to somehow not be. and with that mission, if forces you to oddly lecture folks for daring to call this a Frank Reich O as wrong lol. Which it is. Or point out basics like Scott FA adds were horrific given what Frank was going to run. Which they were. But you didn’t say it and you have blindly defended Fitt. So they can’t be bad moves. Everyone is wrong, you got the gymnastics to defend Fitt. But you don’t. I’ve been wrong about a lot historically. It’s ok. That’s part of the fun here. I got some all timers. But my average is way higher than you in recent history. I’ve nailed a lot and it’s played out exactly as that in recent times. I can handle being wrong. You might need to work on that one. -
I was just trying to show they can attack and threaten you. And it works. It’s just not a consistent and reliable one with a rookie QB thrown in there in relief. But we present zero threat attack a D and we are on plan A for the year
-
Offensive Schemes, Running Game & Blocking FYIs
CRA replied to Bear Hands's topic in Carolina Panthers
Ah, see we are talking about 2 different things. I clarified for you the exact talking points. Several times now. So there would be no confusion about what I am saying. You say they are totally wrong. Cool. Super cool. I can accept that. so if they are totally wrong….That would mean the opposite of the point would be true. Because they are simple points. So I then list what those would be… Now, you seem to be suggesting the argument that would lead to those points being totally wrong is also wrong all while making sure you don’t actually take an actual Seems to me you just want to walk around claiming everyone is wrong. Little else.