Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

drafting


atj00

Recommended Posts

So, I made my own mock draft

1-Rod Wright DT Texas- I like him over Harris and Watson

2-Charles Spencer G Pittsburgh- What I've seen, agile big man

3-Manny Lawson DE NC St.- It be nice to have 4 good DE's

4-Maurice Drew RB/KR UCLA- Maybe the poor man's Reggie Bush, but he impresses me

5-Garett Mills H-B Tulsa- We need an H-Back IMO

7-Joe Klopfenstein TE Colorado- Cool name...a good showing in the Big XII Championship Game

I'm bored and hate the offseason

I want responses :039:

1. IMO gone by the 27th, he'll be the second tackle gone in the draft after Hgata.

2. Spencer isn't what I'd call 2nd round talent.

3. Manny Lawson is a bit small and we don't really need another DE

4.Gone by the third.

6. we don't have a 6th

7. Klopfenstein will be gone by the end of the third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I made my own mock draft

1-Rod Wright DT Texas- I like him over Harris and Watson

2-Charles Spencer G Pittsburgh- What I've seen, agile big man

3-Manny Lawson DE NC St.- It be nice to have 4 good DE's

4-Maurice Drew RB/KR UCLA- Maybe the poor man's Reggie Bush, but he impresses me

5-Garett Mills H-B Tulsa- We need an H-Back IMO

7-Joe Klopfenstein TE Colorado- Cool name...a good showing in the Big XII Championship Game

I'm bored and hate the offseason

I want responses :039:

Rod Wright hasn't shown it. He's got the physical tools, but I don't know if he's there mentally.

Spencer...why do we need a guard? There's a lot of talk about taking a Tackle in R1 or 2 and moving Wharton back to guard...There are much better players sitting around at that point.

Lawson will be gone in the top 50 picks.

Drew will be snapped up by the 3rd latest.

Mills is interesting, though there will be others on the board.

And Klopfenstein will be gone by the end of day 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bunkley = physical stud. 4.99 40 and 44 reps on the press (only Mike Kudla, a de, did better with 45 reps and he ran a 4.76 40). i think bunkley should be a guy to trade up for if we are thinking that we need a stud dt. he should be avalible around when we pick, but i have a feeling he will be picked around 18-24. i think kc will take a look at him, as well as the bengals and maybe even tampa depending on what hte do with mcfarland this off season.

kulda is a guy that i hadnt heard of before this, anyone got any info on what round he projects to be taken in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bunkley = physical stud. 4.99 40 and 44 reps on the press (only Mike Kudla, a de, did better with 45 reps and he ran a 4.76 40). i think bunkley should be a guy to trade up for if we are thinking that we need a stud dt. he should be avalible around when we pick, but i have a feeling he will be picked around 18-24. i think kc will take a look at him, as well as the bengals and maybe even tampa depending on what hte do with mcfarland this off season.

kulda is a guy that i hadnt heard of before this, anyone got any info on what round he projects to be taken in?

After seeing his work out at the combine. I'm really debating weather we should take him or Watson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bunkley is one of the hottest players in the draft right now. I have seen him middle to late in the most recent mocks. I have also heard speculation of him just being a workout warrior, but his game film was pretty impressive as well from what I've seen. I would love to have him in Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I was reading the thread who wants a first rounder? (good write up btw) and it got me to thinking that A LOT of our starters have been drafted by us instead of brought in as free agents. As I looked around the league the most successful teams such as Pittsburgh pats iggles are the ones that draft well (ground breaking i know) and teams that bring in high profile free agents cowbitches and redskins might get a lot of hype but there never really contenders.

So since we have drafted so well I believe that the panthers will win the super bowl soon hopefully this year and the next and the next and the next......

(knock on wood)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm honestly looking beyond DC at this point. He's too green and is making too many simple mistakes. I think he's gone after next year. I think the intention in LV was to use Mayer and Bowers similar to Gronk/Hernandez in NE. That's never really struck me as Carroll's MO though after watching him for years out here in Seattle.  He's talented enough and I think he just got lost behind the phenom that is Bowers because he couldn't develop in Carroll's system. I'm surprised Bowers is used as much as he is, though they really don't have anyone else. TE's don't really exist as focus receivers in Carroll's offense. I live in the PNW so I've been subjected to a lot of Seahawks football.  Coaches other utilize their TEs. We should too. Tremble is OK, but he's always been a project as a receiver. Again, all this is of we could get him at the right price. I wouldn't pay a lot because we need to spend on defense. 
    • David. Hey, money talks.....it has been acknowledged that Tepper isn't shy on spending. He's had the NFL equivalents of used car salesman after used car salesman line up to grift him of a big chunk. Canales is one of them.  Until that changes, it's gonna be tough to build anything to last.
    • Well it's who they tied themselves to for at least another year but i agree. They will be lucky to find a useful contributor but until I see the DC situation change I am presuming it's SSDD. Well it sounds like maybe in 2027. 
×
×
  • Create New...