Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defensive Tackle Review


Retemnav

Recommended Posts

One of the most important questions for the 2010 Panthers is whether a NFL starting caliber DT rotation can be fused together out of the numerous imports that were regarded as "discards" from their former teams. Starting tonight, we'll get a look at these new parts working together for the first time in a game-like situtation, so I thought I would take a look back over who exactly we're expecting to step up and produce.

Ed Johnson – 3 years and a few run-ins with marijuana removed from the undrafted rookie season that saw him start and play well for the Indianapolis Colts, Ed has impressed in camp and will likely get his chance to start in this first preseason game. He’s shown that he can be effective in this defense, playing the same position under the same coordinator on the Colts as he’ll be asked to play here. The question will be whether he’s matured enough to stay out of trouble for an entire season and if his conditioning will hold up enough for him to be effective in the 4th quarter of games.

Before I talk about the next two guys, a little history: Since the Patriots won 3 Super Bowls with a 3-4 defense and because the Steelers and Ravens have fielded strong defenses with 3-4 packages, you’ve seen more and more teams in the NFL adopt the 3-4 as their base package. This year, 15 of the 32 NFL teams will be running the 3-4 or a variety thereof (for example, the 5-2 in Arizona).

One of the reasons that teams like the Patriots, Steelers and Ravens have had such success with the 3-4 is that they were competing for talent within a much smaller pool of teams. The qualities that make a successful NT, 3-4 end and outside linebacker are not the same qualities that make a good 4-3 DT or end. There are the outstanding athletes that can transcend the system, but for the much larger pool of “average” to “above-average” players, they are either a best fit for the 3-4 or the 4-3, but not both. A good 4-3 DT is likely to be too small to play as a true NT in a 3-4, and yet a little too large and slow to handle playing as a 3-4 end.

The shift among NFL teams to a nearly 50% split between the two defenses means that there are now that many fewer teams competing for the competent NFL 4-3 DTs, and points towards the conclusion that the Panthers have probably gotten good value with the misplaced DTs they picked up from teams switching to the 3-4, Louis Leonard and Tank Tyler. Their ceiling is “good” and they are unlikely to be anything more than “average” players, but as long as you have a few above-average players, a bunch of average players are all you need as complementary pieces. What needs to be avoided are the overmatched players, perhaps making it on “heart” and work-ethic, but simply without the athletic skills to be more than a below-average replacement; in other words the Nick Hayden’s of the world. Rudy may have had more heart than anyone in the world, but he still only got to play one series at the end of a game that was over, which is exactly when Nick Hayden should be seeing the field.

Louis Leonard – He was the second team LDE in the Cleveland Browns 3-4, but he also rotated in to the NT at times, a classic example of his ‘tweener’ status in the 3-4. In an extremely small sample size of one game, he looked average to slightly above-average in the 4-3 with the Panther’s. A criticism of him in Cleveland was that he tended to play too high and get pushed back off the snap, so that’s something to keep an eye on in tonight’s game.

Tank Tyler – The 3rd round pick of the KC Chiefs in 2007, he won the starting job in 2008 and played in all 16 games. His tackles, stops and defeats were all above average that year, although good luck getting a Chiefs’ fan to agree with you after the team went 2-14. In 2009, the Chiefs switched to the 3-4 and Tyler was asked to man the NT position, where he quickly fell out of favor with the coaching staff because he didn’t fit the scheme. He’s got the chance to rotate back to his natural spot here, and will most likely work out as a decent starter or as a platoon player with Ed Johnson, helping to keep him fresh.

Corvey Irvin – Our very own 3rd round pick, who lost most of his rookie year to a knee injury, which is unfortunate since he was already looked at as a major developmental project. He only started his senior season at Georgia, and then only because of an injury to the man in front of him. Additionally, he was a junior college transfer. He may be an outlier, but statistically, JuCo transfers normally have significant to severe learning disabilities or limitations, which can be a severe handicap when trying to learn the complexities of an NFL playbook. Given the lack of noise coming out of training camp about his play, if he can stay healthy then his ceiling this year is probably as a situational player where he can use his athleticism without having to diagnose and react too much.

Nick Hayden – All the heart in the world can’t make a 290 pound subpar athlete into a viable starting DT.

Derek Landri – All signs point to Nick Hayden 2.0

So we have two guys (Ed and Tank) who have shown in the past that they are at least average starters in the 4-3, one guy who is probably better than his stats because of being in a 3-4 scheme that could not truly utilize him (Leonard), and a red-shirt rookie who’s athletic but has failed to move up the depth chart in camp, likely because he’s still too raw to be considered a reliable reserve.

With no injuries along the line, we’re in decent shape, although a veteran fourth guy to replace the likely platoon of Irvin/Hayden, relegating them to spot duty, would be ideal. A lot is riding on the starting DTs staying healthy and Ed Johnson rebounding to his 2007 form. If he cannot, then our rotation will face the problem of either over-playing two decent players, leading to higher injury risks and exhaustion late in games, or playing subpar defensive linemen who showed last year that they were not good for much other than tying up an offensive lineman for a few seconds.

With decent health, the defensive tackle rotation has a very good chance to be better than last years, leading to a slightly better run defense. Once camp cut downs begin, however, I would expect for the Panther’s to be active in grabbing DTs cut from some of those other 3-4 teams to try out. As the regular season approaches, another low draft pick or player trade is not out of the question, as an upgrade to the third or fourth DT spot could be an important one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be mistaken here but...

I remember reading ( mainly on this site, and I think once or twice on media website ) that, I think it was Landri, was looking pretty good at DT due to his ability to create a little pressure.

other then that though, good read and good info. I am going to be concentrating on Dline play all night, I think its the biggest ? we have right now and how are Dline plays is what going to make us either and 8-8 team or a 10-6 team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope he is effective, but that seems like a hometeam fluff article for the most part. Other than the fact that he took a few snaps in practice with the first team, it mostly talks about his "execution" being good and the fact that he "works hard". And while the article talks about him not being a fit in the Jaguars 3-4 scheme, they actually ran the 4-3 for most of the time he was there and he never sniffed a starting spot.

He certainly does not have the type of positive history that Tyler or Johnson have. That doesn't rule him out of becoming a decent player, but 3 years of averaging one tackle per game is not a strong indicator of sudden success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft/bestavailable
    • https://www.pff.com/news/draft-the-best-remaining-players-ahead-of-day-3
    • Per PFF: 1. CB Jermod McCoy, Tennessee Volunteers McCoy's medical evaluations will be critical, but based on his measurables and 2024 tape, he profiles as a first-round talent with shutdown potential in press-man coverage. 2. CB Keith Abney II, Arizona State Sun Devils Abney's lack of length and top-tier athleticism may limit him to zone schemes, but his competitiveness and run-defense mentality make him a valuable rotational defensive back with starter potential. 3. CB Keionte Scott, Miami (FL) Hurricanes Scott is a tone-setter in run defense with a physical mentality. His zone coverage is adequate, but man coverage limitations may restrict his role. 4. WR Skyler Bell, Connecticut Huskies Bell looked uncoverable at times against his level of competition in his final season and, despite below-average size and athleticism, produced like a top-100 prospect as a productive slot receiver. 5. WR Bryce Lance, North Dakota State Bison Lance dominated FCS competition as a versatile “X” receiver. He moves well for his size and pairs that with reliable contested-catch production, giving him a strong case as an early Day 3 pick with the potential to develop into a contributing NFL receiver. 6. ED Joshua Josephs, Tennessee Volunteers Josephs has an appealing blend of size and explosiveness but must improve his technique and anticipation to reach his potential. 7. ED Dani Dennis-Sutton, Penn State Nittany Lions Dennis-Sutton projects best as a 3-4 defensive end with some 4-3 flexibility. His length and size are clear strengths, though his agility in space is more limited. With ascending play, he could be drafted higher than his current tape suggests. 8. DI Gracen Halton, Oklahoma Sooners Halton is an undersized, versatile defensive lineman who wins with quickness, effort and movement skills. His lack of strength can be an issue, but he fits well in multiple or movement-based fronts. 9. HB Mike Washington Jr., Arkansas Razorbacks Washington brings alluring size, straight-line speed and yards-after-contact potential as a power back, but also noticeably good vision and footwork to be a potential early-down back in a committee in a man- or gap-scheme run game. 10. WR Elijah Sarratt, Indiana Hoosiers Sarratt may profile as a below-average athlete for an NFL “X” receiver, but there is still plenty to like in his game. His strong hands, coordination and determination at the catch point — combined with his constant competitiveness — give him starter potential as an outside WR2 in offenses that value jump-ball opportunities. 11. WR Deion Burks, Oklahoma Sooners Burks' size and production do not clearly point to a future NFL contributor, but his athleticism and strength make him difficult to dismiss. He offers intriguing upside as an explosive slot receiver, though he may not fit every scheme. 12. DI Darrell Jackson Jr., Florida State Seminoles Jackson is a massive, powerful defensive tackle with imposing physical traits. When his hand usage is right, he can be dominant, but inconsistency in technique and processing limits his impact. He remains a high-upside prospect. 13. C Connor Lew, Auburn Tigers Lew is a technically sound center with excellent leverage, balance and posture. His consistent fundamentals allow him to win positioning battles, though he can struggle against top-end power due to his lighter build. His upside is high given his age and technique. 14. LB Kyle Louis, Pittsburgh Panthers Louis is an undersized linebacker who projects best as a versatile space defender. In the right role, he can be an impact nickel player thanks to his explosiveness and coverage ability. 15. S Kamari Ramsey, USC Trojans Ramsey provides versatility with the ability to play both safety spots and the slot, particularly in two-high looks. His lighter build and good — but not elite — athleticism cap his ceiling. 16. CB Chandler Rivers, Duke Blue Devils Rivers logged 3,186 defensive snaps across four seasons at Duke and allowed just one touchdown in coverage in 2025, with a sub-85.0 passer rating when targeted for the third straight year. He earned a 90.7 PFF grade in 2024 before taking a step back in 2025. Over the past three seasons, he has been flagged just four times while playing more than 70% of his snaps on the outside. 17. C Sam Hecht, Kansas State Wildcats Hecht delivered a strong 2025 campaign, earning an 80.3 PFF overall grade that ranked fourth among centers. He brings a balanced profile, ranking 10th in PFF run-blocking grade (77.7) while holding up adequately in pass protection. Across 759 snaps, he allowed just seven pressures, with zero sacks and zero quarterback hits, and committed no penalties. 18. CB Devin Moore, Florida Gators Moore is an appealing Day 2 prospect with a strong blend of length, speed and ball skills for press-man coverage, though his injury history could impact his draft position. 19. G Jalen Farmer, Kentucky Wildcats Farmer put together a solid but unspectacular 2025 season, earning a 69.8 PFF overall grade that ranked 93rd among guards. His best work came in pass protection, where his 72.4 PFF pass-blocking grade ranked 256th, while his 67.4 run-blocking grade ranked 113th. Across 818 snaps, he allowed 14 pressures, including three sacks and no quarterback hits, and committed one penalty. 20. ED LT Overton, Alabama Crimson Tide Overton fits best as a 3-4 defensive end with inside-out versatility. He can contribute in a 4-3 as a power end, but his lack of bend and stride length limits his ability to consistently threaten the edge. 21. QB Garrett Nussmeier, LSU Tigers Nussmeier brings NFL bloodlines and a polished, foundational approach to the position, traits that fuel his confidence as a vertical pocket passer. However, his average arm strength and below-average stature could create challenges for his aggressive, gunslinging style at the next level. 22. DI Rayshaun Benny, Michigan Wolverines Benny earned a 79.3 PFF grade in 2025, ranking 62nd among 887 qualifying interior defenders. He posted a 68.5 pass-rush grade (161st) and an 83.5 run-defense grade (35th). His production leaned toward run defense, with a clear disparity between phases. 23. S Genesis Smith, Arizona Wildcats Smith has intriguing size and athletic traits for a single-high role, but inconsistency with physicality and play strength limits his reliability. 24. HB Jonah Coleman, Washington Huskies Coleman may not have the flashy athleticism of a fan-favorite RB1, but his game is efficient, powerful and translatable to NFL success, specifically behind zone-blocking schemes where he can gain momentum and one-cut into rushing lanes. He also brings plus third-down reliability as a receiver and pass protector. 25. LB Keyshaun Elliott, Arizona State Sun Devils Elliott has shown flashes as a downhill player, with effectiveness as a run defender and blitzer, but his below-average frame helps explain his limitations in coverage. He earned PFF grades of 67.8 in 2024 and 67.5 in 2025, which reflect a steady but unspectacular profile. His struggles in coverage may limit his role at the next level, though he still offers some starting upside in the right situation. 26. S Zakee Wheatley, Penn State Nittany Lions Wheatley is a long, springy athlete best suited for single-high roles. His slender build can be exposed in the box, but he offers strong range and coverage ability in space. 27. CB Malik Muhammad, Texas Longhorns Muhammad is a decorated cornerback from one of the nation's best secondaries, and his size and pedigree point to starting potential at the next level, particularly in a zone-oriented scheme. He earned PFF grades of 78.5 in 2023, 71.7 in 2024 and 70.8 in 2025. His lighter frame and limited disruptiveness remain concerns and may factor into evaluations despite the overall profile. 28. TE Michael Trigg, Baylor Bears Trigg may have one of the widest ranges of outcomes in the 2026 class. At his best, his vertical athleticism and contested-catch ability suggest top-50 potential, but inconsistencies with technique and focus create volatility in his projection. 29. DI Dontay Corleone, Cincinnati Bearcats Corleone, known as “The Godfather,” was one of the most dominant run defenders in 2022, using his size and strength to control the line of scrimmage. His performance has declined in recent seasons, and his 2024 medical history adds some concern. He offers rare quickness for a nose tackle and can control blockers despite shorter arms, though his pass-rush impact remains limited. He projects as a traditional 3-4 nose tackle. 30. T Dametrious Crownover, Texas A&M Aggies Crownover stands out for his massive frame at 6-foot-7 and 319 pounds with over 35-inch arms, which should earn him a look at the next level. However, he must translate those physical traits more consistently in pass protection to reach his potential. He earned a 58.4 pass-blocking grade in 2025 and allowed two sacks, two hits and 23 hurries across 428 pass-blocking snaps. 31. ED Anthony Lucas, USC Trojans Lucas has an NFL-ready frame and good overall athleticism for his size, but he does not consistently win quickly enough to project as a full-time edge rusher. His length and strength give him versatility across the front in odd schemes. 32. LB Deontae Lawson, Alabama Crimson Tide Lawson is undersized but experienced and quick. He projects as a rotational linebacker with some starting potential. 33. DI Kaleb Proctor, Southeastern Louisiana Lions Proctor, No. 111 on PFF’s Big Board, offers an unusual profile given his size and level of competition, but his explosiveness and pass-rushing ability stand out. His 2025 production supports that evaluation, as he earned an 86.5 PFF grade and generated 39 pressures, including nine sacks, four hits and 26 hurries. His performance against LSU in particular highlights his upside and reinforces his case as a potential late-round value. 34. CB Will Lee III, Texas A&M Aggies Lee, No. 114 on PFF’s Big Board, offers an intriguing developmental profile, as his size, length and leaping ability translate to strong ball skills. He earned a 66.5 PFF grade in 2025 after a stronger 76.2 mark in 2023, and he recorded eight pass breakups in each of the past two seasons. His run defense, tackling and penalty discipline remain areas for improvement, but the physical tools and ball production point to late-round value. 35. G Billy Schrauth, Notre Dame Fighting Irish Schrauth’s career included injury setbacks, but his play on the field showed a high level of performance for Notre Dame. He earned an 82.7 pass-blocking grade and a 73.1 run-blocking grade in 2025, and he did not allow a sack or a hit while surrendering just two hurries across 213 pass-blocking snaps. His game features strong pad level, a firm anchor in pass protection and good grip strength, though balance and foot speed present some limitations. The overall profile supports projection as a starting-caliber interior lineman. 36. WR Brenen Thompson, Mississippi State Bulldogs Thompson’s elite speed and big-play ability will draw interest, but his below-average size and inconsistent contested-catch rate complicate his projection. He ran a 4.26 40-yard dash, which ranks in the 100th percentile at the position, along with a 2.53-second 20-yard split in the 93rd percentile. In 2025, he caught 57 of 87 targets for 1,054 yards and six touchdowns, averaging 2.77 yards per route run and 4.3 yards after the catch per reception
×
×
  • Create New...