Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clausen Draft Inflated?


CLTPanther

Recommended Posts

Mel Kiper couldn't be less relevant to where Clausen was taken than I was.

Clausen was a certified blue-chip draft prospect. By every statistical measure that indicates future success in the pros save the wonderlic (where he was average), he excelled. The reason that the Panthers managed to get him wasn't due to his supposed attitude problems so much as it was circumstance.

No one who counts is going to talk, but Clausen probably graded out as a mid-first round pick on most draft boards. Had Bradford not been there he would have been much higher. If you look at who the teams that needed a QB were, and where they drafted, the reasons for his slide are much more apparent:

Washington - 4th

Seattle - 6th, 14th

Cleveland - 7th, 38th

Buffalo - 9th , 41st

Minnesota - 34th

His slide started because the hype said he was a top 10, but nobody in the top 10 believed it. And when The Golden Calf of Bristol was taken before him the Quinn comparisons probably didn't help. After Minnesota passed on him (probably for fear of pissing off Lord Favre), then it's no wonder that Cleveland took a pass at 38. Can you imagine the fan base had they taken another Notre Dame QB high? The real risk was Buffalo at 41, and they had more issues on the defense.

Carolina was trying all day to move up in the 2nd to get him. QB is not generally a BPA pick, particularly in the early rounds. You take a QB because you need one, and if you don't have a player that grades out near or ahead of where you pick, you pass.

This year, Clausen was a victim of circumstance, and the Panthers got lucky. Nothing Kiper or Mayock said before the draft changed any of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t go back and look at the espn but there live it definitely said 1 shot 1 goal when it happened. I guess they had not added them yet. Still allowing goals that early is rough. Blue line is a total disaster still. Even with Slavin back. Miller and Nikishin keep making mistakes after mistakes. 
    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
    • Thank God we are inthe NFC South--
×
×
  • Create New...