Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Panthers claim another NT Frank Kearse


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
259 replies to this topic

#251 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • Joined: 11-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,918
  • Reputation: 888
HUDDLER

Posted 20 September 2011 - 09:24 PM

We must really like him, because he has to be on the roster now.plus guys nobody wants a washed up dt like pat williams, or tommie harris.

#252 TheOracle

TheOracle

    Know-It-All

  • Joined: 28-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,457
  • Reputation: 20
HUDDLER

Posted 21 September 2011 - 07:49 AM

Getting rid of Reggie Wells was stupid. The guy played well against the Packers.

#253 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,315
  • Reputation: 1,836
SUPPORTER

Posted 21 September 2011 - 07:56 AM

Played what? With himself? He was in street clothes on the sideline.

#254 YoungPanthers89

YoungPanthers89

    Lucy Snorebush

  • Joined: 06-February 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,491
  • Reputation: 1,957
HUDDLER

Posted 21 September 2011 - 08:07 AM

Getting rid of Reggie Wells was stupid. The guy played well against the Packers.


lol

#255 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,699
  • Reputation: 2,638
HUDDLER

Posted 21 September 2011 - 09:19 AM

So is Frank Kearse injured yet?

#256 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,653
  • Reputation: 6,636
SUPPORTER

Posted 21 September 2011 - 09:42 AM

Getting rid of Reggie Wells was stupid. The guy played well against the Packers.


Not sure if serious...

#257 TheOracle

TheOracle

    Know-It-All

  • Joined: 28-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,457
  • Reputation: 20
HUDDLER

Posted 21 September 2011 - 10:12 AM

Played what? With himself? He was in street clothes on the sideline.


I was thinking Byron Bell at the time I saw the news.

#258 XClown1986

XClown1986

    I'm a good clown

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 2,090
  • Reputation: 571
SUPPORTER

Posted 21 September 2011 - 11:57 AM

I think 4 DTs will be active against Jax. Pure and simple, if you stop MJD, the Jags really have no shot. Rotating 4 DTs would give the best chance of doing that.

#259 paulSM

paulSM

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 15-February 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 164
  • Reputation: 3
HUDDLER

Posted 21 September 2011 - 03:57 PM

I think 4 DTs will be active against Jax. Pure and simple, if you stop MJD, the Jags really have no shot. Rotating 4 DTs would give the best chance of doing that.


That actually makes a lot of sense.

Also, for all those people grumbling about not getting a vet. The vets out there are there for a reason. If we want any usuable talent grabbing uncovered rookies that might thrive in a different place could be the best option.

#260 maddog

maddog

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 07-September 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 110
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 21 September 2011 - 04:27 PM

I think 4 DTs will be active against Jax. Pure and simple, if you stop MJD, the Jags really have no shot. Rotating 4 DTs would give the best chance of doing that.


Yeah if the DT's are actually capable of doing that and not getting drove back!