Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

A quick Look back at Chud


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#21 Way Truth Life

Way Truth Life

    Member

  • Joined: 26-November 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 633
  • Reputation: 103
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:47 AM

henning got sucked in to the john fox turbine. you can't look at henning in a vacuum because fox had veto power over every play called on offense.

Look at Miami the years after. Ran the same offense with less talent. They sucked.

#22 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,318
  • Reputation: 2,933
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:47 AM

Henning's offense required more components and scored MUCH less....so....NO it was not as effective as Chuds.


You're entitled to your opinion. Chud was arguably the biggest root of our problem this past season. He misused his tools. Let him take his cute ugliness to Cleveland. He will fit right in. We'll see what an offensive savant he is there, plus we'll see if it was more of a case that he was actually hindering Cam and our offense here.

#23 Second_Solution

Second_Solution

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 10-June 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 157
  • Reputation: 21
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:48 AM

It means the problem wasn't Chud!

Damn this place is dense.


So implementing what was basically a college offence this past season wasn't a big part of why we missed the play-offs?

Chud was a big reason why we finished with a losing record this season.

#24 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    DeAngelo Williams/Steve Smith Huddle: Est 2003

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 11,636
  • Reputation: 5,037
  • LocationChapel Hill
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:50 AM

Look at Miami the years after. Ran the same offense with less talent. They sucked.


i'm not about to stand up for the guy by any means.

i also don't buy the notion that he did "more with less" because i'd kill for a smith-in his prime moose-proehl WR corps right now myself.

#25 Way Truth Life

Way Truth Life

    Member

  • Joined: 26-November 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 633
  • Reputation: 103
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:51 AM

So implementing what was basically a college offence this past season wasn't a big part of why we missed the play-offs?

Chud was a big reason why we finished with a losing record this season.

NO

Losing 5 4th quarter leads and 6 2nd half leads is the PROBLEM!!!

Clock management, poor defense adjustments in the 4th and Rivera's inexperience at closing out games is the reason we missed the playoffs.

DAMN THIS PLACE IS DENSE!!!!

#26 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,318
  • Reputation: 2,933
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:56 AM

i'm not about to stand up for the guy by any means.

i also don't buy the notion that he did "more with less" because i'd kill for a smith-in his prime moose-proehl WR corps right now myself.


I am not disagreeing about the WRs, but you can't discount our RB corps. We have three pass-catching, potential stud RBs along with Smitty (who is STILL a stud), not to mention a stud TE and a supporting cast of WRs (that can probably fill in the gaps quite nicely).

#27 Way Truth Life

Way Truth Life

    Member

  • Joined: 26-November 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 633
  • Reputation: 103
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:58 AM

I am not disagreeing about the WRs, but you can't discount our RB corps. We have three pass-catching, potential stud RBs along with Smitty (who is STILL a stud), not to mention a stud TE and a supporting cast of WRs (that can probably fill in the gaps quite nicely).

I would take Foster and Davis duo over DW and Stewart everyday of the week and twice on Sunday!

#28 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,318
  • Reputation: 2,933
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:59 AM

NO

Losing 5 4th quarter leads and 6 2nd half leads is the PROBLEM!!!

Clock management, poor defense adjustments in the 4th and Rivera's inexperience at closing out games is the reason we missed the playoffs.

DAMN THIS PLACE IS DENSE!!!!


You are adding to the denseness with some kind of obvious affinity to use the word "dense". It's all just a matter of opinion and analysis. Your opinion is not validated by your use of the word "dense".

#29 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,318
  • Reputation: 2,933
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:00 AM

I would take Foster and Davis duo over DW and Stewart everyday of the week and twice on Sunday!


Good for you. I bet you'd be in the minority.





You'd probably take Delhomme over Cam too.

#30 Second_Solution

Second_Solution

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 10-June 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 157
  • Reputation: 21
HUDDLER

Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:04 AM

NO

Losing 5 4th quarter leads and 6 2nd half leads is the PROBLEM!!!

Clock management, poor defense adjustments in the 4th and Rivera's inexperience at closing out games is the reason we missed the playoffs.

DAMN THIS PLACE IS DENSE!!!!


I said Chud was a big reason, not the only reason. If the offence had been able to execute better in the first half of the season we would have made the playoffs.

Once we got rid of Chud's ridiculous college play calling the team picked up. Surely you were as frustrated as everyone else when you saw the offence run yet another option play that was stopped for a loss. A poor offensive gameplan for the first half of the season if the main reason we had a losing record.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users