Isn't that obvious?
Shula is Rivera's best hope at keeping his job. Not because he is the best OC available, but because he does not have to completely overhaul the current offense.
Hiring an outsider offensive coordinator would mean the entire offensive staff would be gone and a completely new offensive system in place. A new playbook. New terminology for the players to learn. New chemistry to be developed between players and coaches. Often, this can take more than one season to start yielding results.
Rivera does not have more than one season. If the Panthers do not win this year, he is gone. He knows it, everyone knows it.
So put yourself in his shoes. Knowing you can only lose 7 games next season or your ass is fired, would you
1: Hire a completely new offensive staff and implement a new system knowing in all likelyhood it will take a good of time to develop into a good offense if ever at all. or...
2. Promote from within and hope the current offense can be good enough to get you 9 wins. No learning curve, fewer variables.
Lets be clear here. The Shula hire was not made because he was the best candidate. Shula was hired because it presented the best option for Rivera to possibly win 9 games next season. It was a last ditch short term job saving hire. Any considerations past 2013 are an afterthought.
Admittedly I have not read the entire thread. So maybe this question has been asked.
But logic rears its ugly head to beg the question:
If promoting Shula instead of hiring from outside will give the Panthers
the best chance to win the most games next year (which is what you are implying), why wouldn't that be true beyond next year?
If next year the Panthers end with a winning season and Coach Rivera keeps his job, what are you saying would change that would make him change his OC?
Your statements have only one basis in reality, that head coaches will always hire the coordinators and coaches that they feel will help the team win. Something you are attributing only to Coach Rivera?