http://signup.elderscrollsonline.com/
Also released a cinematic trailer
Elder Scrolls Online Beta Signup
Started by CarolinaSock, Jan 25 2013 04:18 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 25 January 2013 - 04:18 PM
#2
Posted 28 January 2013 - 10:11 AM
I never have luck on betas but hopefully I get picked. I really hope this game isn't a sub. I hope it's either F2P with microtransactions or a Guild Wars 2 model, buy it and play.
IF they do a sub, hope it's only like 5 bucks. $15 like WoW would be a turn off for me.
Nice trailer though, I wish they'd do a movie/TV like that lol.
IF they do a sub, hope it's only like 5 bucks. $15 like WoW would be a turn off for me.
Nice trailer though, I wish they'd do a movie/TV like that lol.
#3
Posted 28 January 2013 - 08:29 PM
I'd much prefer a sub payment model. With a sub payment model, the developers get a nice influx of cash, while developing huge patch updates that you don't have to pay for (much like WoW.)
However, I will have to say, I really do love the Guild Wars 2 model. If I were developing an MMO, especially one the size of TESO, I'd go that route. With some content locked behind microtransactions (see: Black Lion Chests), which gives the developing team money past the initial buy into the game, while also offering up cosmetic items that players are likely to buy. Also, when I play WoW, I feel like I have to play, since I'm paying for the time. With GW2, I feel like it's more of a play when I want, how I want type thing. I love that.
However, I will have to say, I really do love the Guild Wars 2 model. If I were developing an MMO, especially one the size of TESO, I'd go that route. With some content locked behind microtransactions (see: Black Lion Chests), which gives the developing team money past the initial buy into the game, while also offering up cosmetic items that players are likely to buy. Also, when I play WoW, I feel like I have to play, since I'm paying for the time. With GW2, I feel like it's more of a play when I want, how I want type thing. I love that.
#4
Posted 29 January 2013 - 09:46 AM
And yet another good franchise gets watered downed and ruined by making it an MMO.
#5
Posted 29 January 2013 - 10:50 PM
Right, feeling like you HAVE to play is a downside of sub. I don't think sub is viable anymore. We seen it fail with Star Wars, Secret World, LOTRO, DDO, DCU, etc. WoW can continue doing it because people are so invested in their characters they don't want to ditch them. Fact is, casual gaming market is where the money is, especially with a Elder Scrolls name behind the game. You want all the Skyrim and Oblivion fans to buy this, and if you charge sub, you'll miss out on a LARGE market. Even though there is usually justification for sub, most people just don't like it (casuals) and won't even try it. The money is in casuals now, and gaming companies know this.
#6
Posted 30 January 2013 - 12:42 PM
bethesda can't even put out a finished single player game, this is gonna be like a mentally handicapped rapefest
#7
Posted 30 January 2013 - 06:44 PM
bethesda can't even put out a finished single player game, this is gonna be like a mentally handicapped rapefest
Good thing they aren't making this game.
I think one of the people that is leading the effort is a guy who has experience with games like Dark Age of Camelot (I think).
But if Beshesda WAS making the game, it would definitely be bug central.
#8
Posted 02 February 2013 - 01:47 PM
Matt Firor was one of the leads on DAOC and left Mythic around the time they were bought by EA. My understanding was he had a heavy influence on the RvR system in DAOC which gives me hope for the PvP side of the game.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





