Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

NC on the verge of passing the worst voter suppression bill the nation has ever seen


  • Please log in to reply
97 replies to this topic

#1 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,512 posts

Posted 24 July 2013 - 01:14 PM

Voting in North Carolina may soon change, much in the same way a wrecking ball changes a building.

 

The highly-conservative North Carolina legislature just released a new voter suppression bill that would enact not just voter ID, but a host of other new initiatives designed to make it more difficult to vote. A significant roadblock to the legislation was removed last month when the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act, making it easier for states with a history of racial discrimination like North Carolina to enact new voter suppression laws.

The Senate will consider substituted language for HB 589 on Tuesday afternoon. Among the dozens of changes, these are the most onerous for North Carolina voters:

  • Implementing a strict voter ID requirement that bars citizens who don’t have a proper photo ID from casting a ballot.
  • Eliminating same-day voter registration, which allowed residents to register at the polls.
  • Cutting early voting by a full week.
  • Increasing the influence of money in elections by raising the maximum campaign contribution to $5,000 and increasing the limit every two years.
  • Making it easier for voter suppression groups like True The Vote to challenge any voterwho they think may be ineligible by requiring that challengers simply be registered in the same county, rather than precinct, of those they challenge.
  • Vastly increasing the number of “poll observers” and increasing what they’re permitted to do. In 2012, ThinkProgress caught the Romney campaign training such poll observers using highly misleading information.
  • Only permitting citizens to vote in their specific precinct, rather than casting a ballot in any nearby ward or election district. This can lead to widespread confusion, particularly in urban areas where many precincts can often be housed in the same building.
  • Barring young adults from pre-registering as 16- and 17-year-olds, which is permitted by current law, and repealing a state directive that high schools conduct voter registration drives in order to boost turnout among young voters.
  • Prohibiting some types of paid voter registration drives, which tend to register poor and minority citizens.
  • Dismantling three state public financing programs, including the landmark program that funded judicial elections.
  • Weakening disclosure requirements for outside spending groups.
  • Preventing counties from extending polling hours in the event of long lines or other extraordinary circumstances and making it more difficult for them to accommodate elderly or disabled voters with satellite polling sites at nursing homes, for instance.

 

http://thinkprogress...sion/?mobile=nc

 

Yep, NC is already worse than SC and our elections will resemble something of what Florida has. Preventing Counties from extending polling hours and cutting early voting by a FULL week is just criminal



#2 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    We dominated time of possession though!

  • ALL-PRO
  • 10,688 posts
  • LocationChapel Hill

Posted 24 July 2013 - 01:38 PM

it's to keep the dumbocrats from bussing homeless people in and paying them with a tallboy to vote 50 times

 

i saw it in this here james o'keefe video



#3 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,687 posts

Posted 24 July 2013 - 01:42 PM

Thinkprogress...lol

 

No agenda there.



#4 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,512 posts

Posted 24 July 2013 - 02:10 PM

Thinkprogress...lol

 

No agenda there.

Reported by the Charlotte Observer, facts are facts. 

http://www.charlotte...h-sweeping.html



#5 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,687 posts

Posted 24 July 2013 - 02:19 PM

Let's look at these one at a time...

 

  • Implementing a strict voter ID requirement that bars citizens who don’t have a proper photo ID from casting a ballot.  I have no problem with this at all. 
  • Eliminating same-day voter registration, which allowed residents to register at the polls.  There are reasons against same day registrations.  Democrats ignore them, but there's no way for them to validate/check on whether the voter is valid or not for a particular precinct cannot realistically be done same day.
  • Cutting early voting by a full week.  Can you tell everyone when early voting began in NC?
  • Increasing the influence of money in elections by raising the maximum campaign contribution to $5,000 and increasing the limit every two years. I don't see the big deal as long as everything is open and transparent.  Voters will judge people based on that information.
  • Making it easier for voter suppression groups like True The Vote to challenge any voterwho they think may be ineligible by requiring that challengers simply be registered in the same county, rather than precinct, of those they challenge.  So.  That can "legally" be done now by poll watchers.  I love how ThinkProgress labels them as a voter suppression group when their goal is to ensure 1 legal voter=1 vote. 
  • Vastly increasing the number of “poll observers” and increasing what they’re permitted to do. In 2012, ThinkProgress caught the Romney campaign training such poll observers using highly misleading information. LOL...completely joke of a statement to make.  Misleading is what THIS is.  Is it true that some poll watchers used by republicans are sometimes wrong?  Yes.  But I don't see ThinkProgress showing much concern when poll watchers are kicked out of Philly wards even though they have every right to be there. 
  • Only permitting citizens to vote in their specific precinct, rather than casting a ballot in any nearby ward or election district. This can lead to widespread confusion, particularly in urban areas where many precincts can often be housed in the same building.  Wow...imagine that.  Voter education.  TP wants voter ignorance.  Hardly an issue in NC where the problem is the voting location vs. the ballot they should receive.  More voter identification and authorization would minimize these sorts of issues. 
  • Barring young adults from pre-registering as 16- and 17-year-olds, which is permitted by current law, and repealing a state directive that high schools conduct voter registration drives in order to boost turnout among young voters. Indifferent
  • Prohibiting some types of paid voter registration drives, which tend to register poor and minority citizens.  Absolutely.  This is a sham and it should be a civic duty.  Not a system of fraud and causing undue burden on our election offices.  Lots of times a large number of registrations are turned in at the very last minute knowing that the offices cannot possibly handle the workload of confirming and ensuring the voter's status and appropriate precinct.  Let alone the BS registrants that are put in.
  • Dismantling three state public financing programs, including the landmark program that funded judicial elections.  Indifferent, no one is fooled by this anymore.
  • Weakening disclosure requirements for outside spending groups.  I'd like to see this legislation.
  • Preventing counties from extending polling hours in the event of long lines or other extraordinary circumstances and making it more difficult for them to accommodate elderly or disabled voters with satellite polling sites at nursing homes, for instance. I have never liked the power a judge has to extend voting times for this precinct over that.  As long as you are IN line at the time of closing, you get to vote.  Who cares about the length of the line. 


#6 ARSEN

ARSEN

    Banned

  • ALL-PRO
  • 12,347 posts

Posted 24 July 2013 - 02:22 PM

I might pick jury duty over voting.

#7 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,325 posts

Posted 25 July 2013 - 08:27 PM

Fwiw, while I don't care about the voter id law, limiting early voting is dumb.

 

That being said, if someone actually said this was the worst voter suppression law the nation has ever seen, then that person's knowledge of history must be limited to the last few years.



#8 Zaximus

Zaximus

    I'm Brett Jensen

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,056 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 25 July 2013 - 08:34 PM

In 6 months we've lost 20 years of progression in NC.   These are obvious changes to prevent a large portion of democrats from voting or making it much harder.  Once again it's becoming the land of the rednecks.



#9 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,687 posts

Posted 25 July 2013 - 09:05 PM

THE WORST THIS NATION HAS EVER SEEN!!!!!



#10 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,605 posts

Posted 25 July 2013 - 09:09 PM

 

Let's look at these one at a time...

 

  • Implementing a strict voter ID requirement that bars citizens who don’t have a proper photo ID from casting a ballot.  I have no problem with this at all. 
  • Eliminating same-day voter registration, which allowed residents to register at the polls.  There are reasons against same day registrations.  Democrats ignore them, but there's no way for them to validate/check on whether the voter is valid or not for a particular precinct cannot realistically be done same day.
  • Cutting early voting by a full week.  Can you tell everyone when early voting began in NC?
  • Increasing the influence of money in elections by raising the maximum campaign contribution to $5,000 and increasing the limit every two years. I don't see the big deal as long as everything is open and transparent.  Voters will judge people based on that information.
  • Making it easier for voter suppression groups like True The Vote to challenge any voterwho they think may be ineligible by requiring that challengers simply be registered in the same county, rather than precinct, of those they challenge.  So.  That can "legally" be done now by poll watchers.  I love how ThinkProgress labels them as a voter suppression group when their goal is to ensure 1 legal voter=1 vote. 
  • Vastly increasing the number of “poll observers” and increasing what they’re permitted to do. In 2012, ThinkProgress caught the Romney campaign training such poll observers using highly misleading information. LOL...completely joke of a statement to make.  Misleading is what THIS is.  Is it true that some poll watchers used by republicans are sometimes wrong?  Yes.  But I don't see ThinkProgress showing much concern when poll watchers are kicked out of Philly wards even though they have every right to be there. 
  • Only permitting citizens to vote in their specific precinct, rather than casting a ballot in any nearby ward or election district. This can lead to widespread confusion, particularly in urban areas where many precincts can often be housed in the same building.  Wow...imagine that.  Voter education.  TP wants voter ignorance.  Hardly an issue in NC where the problem is the voting location vs. the ballot they should receive.  More voter identification and authorization would minimize these sorts of issues. 
  • Barring young adults from pre-registering as 16- and 17-year-olds, which is permitted by current law, and repealing a state directive that high schools conduct voter registration drives in order to boost turnout among young voters. Indifferent
  • Prohibiting some types of paid voter registration drives, which tend to register poor and minority citizens.  Absolutely.  This is a sham and it should be a civic duty.  Not a system of fraud and causing undue burden on our election offices.  Lots of times a large number of registrations are turned in at the very last minute knowing that the offices cannot possibly handle the workload of confirming and ensuring the voter's status and appropriate precinct.  Let alone the BS registrants that are put in.
  • Dismantling three state public financing programs, including the landmark program that funded judicial elections.  Indifferent, no one is fooled by this anymore.
  • Weakening disclosure requirements for outside spending groups.  I'd like to see this legislation.
  • Preventing counties from extending polling hours in the event of long lines or other extraordinary circumstances and making it more difficult for them to accommodate elderly or disabled voters with satellite polling sites at nursing homes, for instance. I have never liked the power a judge has to extend voting times for this precinct over that.  As long as you are IN line at the time of closing, you get to vote.  Who cares about the length of the line. 

 

 

So you are cool with a program that will cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars on a problem that doesn't really exist?

 

Never, talk about wasteful spending again if you support this.  kthx
 



#11 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,687 posts

Posted 25 July 2013 - 09:11 PM

So you are cool with a program that will cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars on a problem that doesn't really exist?

 

Never, talk about wasteful spending again if you support this.  kthx
 

 

TENS OF MILLIONS!!!!!



#12 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,322 posts

Posted 25 July 2013 - 09:17 PM

Where was the part where Klan members get to work polling places with billy clubs?

Only in Philly? And a different hate group? Oh, Okay

#13 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,605 posts

Posted 25 July 2013 - 09:22 PM

TENS OF MILLIONS!!!!!

 

Yep.  Of taxpayer money.  On something that doesn't exist.

 

I'll ask you again, are you now okay with spending taxpayer money on things that are not real issues?

 

As a conservative I know that you aren't which is why you surely don't support this.



#14 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,687 posts

Posted 25 July 2013 - 09:24 PM

How much is your vote worth. 



#15 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,605 posts

Posted 25 July 2013 - 09:29 PM

How much is your vote worth. 

 

So yes you agree with the spending on something that isn't really an issue?  That is cool, just never talk about frivolous spending again. 

 

It is pretty simple.  If you support this, don't ever talk about frivolous spending issues again, if you don't support it I admire you for sticking to your beliefs as a conservative.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com