Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Are Cam and Rivera adjoined at the hip?

141 posts in this topic

Posted

Just a question... How many QBs in the league were not true pocket passers last year? So what percentage of "not true pocket passers" were in the playoffs?

 

Give Cam a coach that knows how to maxmize an offense, and he'll be in the playoffs too - from the pocket or anywhere else.

 

Gettlemen answers your question in the quote I posted.

 

I agree with the second statement.  I wonder if Gettlemen does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I agree, but I was not offering my opinion, something conveniently missed here.  I was offering Gettlemen's.  Let's look at it from his--not your's, not mine, based on what we know:

 

1. Gettlemen has cash but has not brought in much on the OL....He said they need to develop chemistry and that takes time.  You think he needs to do more, I think he needs to do more--but Gettlemen seems to disagree with us.

 

2. Gettlemen has cash and brought in 2 borderline WRs. There have not been rumors of a trade or a free agent signing, as there were with Wharton and Mikell.  I want a stud WR to add to the mix, you want a stud WR to add to the mix.  Gettlemen has not seemed too interested.   It matters not what we think.

 

3. Gettlemen told Cam that it is time to Win---not 2014---now.  That is the bottom line. 

 

4.  Cam has been more of a pocket passer during the first 2 games.  He has had pressure, but when he has not, he has been indecisive and his accuracy is off.   Gettlemen does not care about Cam '11 or '12.  He wants to see what Cam '13 is going to do.  Cam has displayed some things that make intelligent football experts question his ability to be that QB-that is a common opinion.  He flashes and has great plays, but some defenses are able to shut him down.  He seems confused and frustrated by them.  The fact that Gettlemen thinks pocket passers are the way to go and the fact that Shula has Cam in the pocket is not a coincidence.  This could be Cam's audition for the Gettlemen blueprint.  Are the W's rolling in?  Has he been effective in the pocket?  After 2 games, I would say "no." 

 

5.  Gettlemen has been true to his core, and one of his philosophical foundations is that pocket passing QBs are the winners.  If Cam is struggling in the pocket and the Panthers are losing, I wonder what Gettlemen would think?  Give Cam $20 million per season for the next 5 year? 

 

That does not sound like a 5-year, $110 m extension to me.  It does not mean that Cam is gone either--it means what I said--there is room for speculation. Cam will have to improve, in my opinion, to get a big deal from Gettlemen.  As it stands now, I am not sure he is the future.  I don't care what Richardson said after 16 games.   I am pretty sure you didn't read this far.

 

When I first heard his comments about Cam "winning", I was taken aback a bit until I read it in the context that it was conveniently taken out of. If you are going to present that quote it is important to do so in it's entirety.

 

I very much like that we brought in Ginn, who at this point is outplaying Lafell.

 

As for Hixon, I had high hopes, but I'm not sure he will ever be a viable healthy weapon for us this season. It kind of disappoints me because Gettleman knew of his injury history from his days working for the Giants.

 

On this "pocket passer" talk. If that's what we have planned, shoehorning Cam into an offense that doesn't fit him, then not only are we wasting our time, we are wasting his. I seriously hope that isn't what our GM is doing.

 

If this franchise is dumb enough to move on from a talent like Cam, without giving him the benefit of playing in a system that fits his strengths, or giving him a chance with a competent staff. That may be my breaking point.

 

I've tolerated the lame duck season in 2010, we're doing it again just three years later. I won't tolerate much more. I hope that JR and Gettleman are not that shortsighted to make a disastrous mistake. Time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Lol you can choose to be blind to it but I'm just saying you can't stare down receivers in this league. 

 

 

I agree.  If you stare down receivers, that leads to more and more interceptions.

 

Like Cam's... ermmmm... ONE interception?

 

Great point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I think that Cam will be dealt if he cannot become the pocket passer Gettlemen wants-and that could be a mistake.  I think you could be 100% correct, but I also think, in the wrong system, giving Cam $120 million could be equally as tragic. 

 

For Cam to be great, he needs weapons, protection, and the option to run.  I am not sure Gettlemen sees football that way--he sees them multi-threat QBs as gimmicks.  I could be wrong, but we all have to piece it together.

 

Cam is not being handled right at the moment, if you ask me.  If Gettlemen bases a decision on a player with no protection, weapons, and coaching--dealing Cam could be the lowest point--like when the Steelers sent Unitas to Baltimore.  You remember that, don't you?  :)

 

I

 

Just going to throw this in here after seeing those other Cam Newton threads with quotes from Jerry Richardson saying that "Cam is the last quarterback I'll ever have"... 

 

If Jerry Richardson believes in Cam being this team's future, and it came to a point where David Gettleman wants to trade Cam away. Who would Jerry Richardson put his weight behind, the QB he believes is this team's future, or the general manager he has hired to build a contender?

 

I think it would be interesting to see who Jerry would back, because while Gettleman has done as good a job as he could to date, there are plenty of up and coming people that could get their chance as a GM in the next season or two. And while young QBs come along each year, QBs like Cam are come along once in a while. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

No I wouldn't give Cam Eli money right now. I'm curious though, which QB in his third year or less would you give Eli money to?

 

I am giving the Gettlemen perspective from what we know if him through his actions and comments.  He would probably feel comfortable giving that kind or money to second year QBs- Andrew Luck, maybe Tanneyhill, and maybe Kaepernick because he has shown to be effective in the pocket. 

 

There are only about 10 starting QBs on first contracts, so that is a rather large number.  I firmly believe that Gettlemen has no interest in the Vicks and RGIIIs. 

 

My point was this:  Cam is going to have to improve in the pocket before Gettlemen makes him rich.  He is not going to give $120 million to what he sees as a gimmick.

 

Just speculation.  I hope Cam has the support (players and coaches) and shows everyone he can do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

 

Personally, though, I can't see any new head coach wanting to get rid of Cam Newton as his QB. Cam has made a big impact on the league so far. He's thrown for over 8,000 yards, 43 TDs, and a 1,500 rushing yards and 22 TDs. 

 

 

This is really all that needs to be said.

 

Wait, no... I'm sorry.

 

CAM OVERTHREW A RECEIVER BURN HIM BURN HIM BURN HIM!!!!~111!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

However, from Gettlemen''s perspective, which is what I offered, he (apparently) thinks Cam has the weapons and protection

 

 

Then Gettlemen is a goddammed moron (if that is what he truly thinks).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

When I first heard his comments about Cam "winning", I was taken aback a bit until I read it in the context that it was conveniently taken out of. If you are going to present that quote it is important to do so in it's entirety.

 

 

On this "pocket passer" talk. If that's what we have planned, shoehorning Cam into an offense that doesn't fit him, then not only are we wasting our time, we are wasting his. I seriously hope that isn't what our GM is doing.

 

 

Not sure how expecting your QB to start winning is taken out of context.  Winning is the only context.

 

The second point is not just talk, it is talk from the GM.  And you state what I have been saying the whole time--It is the reality of the situation--not treason to say it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Not sure how expecting your QB to start winning is taken out of context.  Winning is the only context.

 

The second point is not just talk, it is talk from the GM.  And you state what I have been saying the whole time--It is the reality of the situation--not treason to say it.

 

Expecting your QB to start winning while at the same time refusing to upgrade one of the the worst o-lines in Panthers history makes you either a fuging idiot or a disingenuous asshole.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Btw, the last time Cam left the field, we were winning.

 

But I guess it's Cam's fault we lost, even though the GM who told him to start winning refused to upgrade the secondary that lost us the game.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Not sure how expecting your QB to start winning is taken out of context. Winning is the only context.

The second point is not just talk, it is talk from the GM. And you state what I have been saying the whole time--It is the reality of the situation--not treason to say it.

I'll have to look. Joe Person tried to twist it all into a big story by describing a "pregnant pause" from Gettleman.

There were numerous threads about this. There was definitely more to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Preach it brother teeray!

I love how worked up y'all get over things you don't know.. I love to speculate too, but there is a point where you have to trust those who are paid to make decisions.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites