Jump to content

<

Cary Kollins

Member Since 07 Nov 2011
Last Active Today, 04:47 PM
-----

Topics I've Started

"Concussions have become the new global warming"

24 March 2015 - 09:47 AM

via foxnews

 

Don’t look now, but concussions have become the new global warming: a debate where “consensus” trumps evidence, and heroes and villains are determined by their stances on an issue where the science is bogus at worst and murky at best.

 

 

However, as described in my book, "Bias in the Booth," studies have shown that NFL players are less likely to commit suicide than people in the general population, and there is not conclusive evidence that CTE causes suicide in the first place. Some researchers even refute any link between CTE and contact sports at all

 

http://www.foxnews.c...and-is-no-hero/

 

 

lol

 

 

 

 

 

 


Four racist cops in Florida lose their jobs

22 March 2015 - 07:18 PM



A five-month internal investigation led to three of them being fired, and one of them resigning, according to NBC Miami. The officers reportedly sent a trailer-style video amongst themselves containing a Ku Klux Klan hood, attacks against minorities, derogatory images of President Obama and racist comments about Hispanics and homosexuals.

"I had a wet dream that you two found those n-----s in the VW and gave them the death penalty right there on the spot," one of the texts reads. Many of their extremely hostile and racially charged conversations can be read at the Sun Sentinel.

According to another text, one of the officers said, "We are coming and drinking all your beer and killing n-----s."

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6918652

Here are some more texts they sent:

http://media.trb.com...52-20161910.pdf

Teh jimmy Graham traded to seattle

10 March 2015 - 03:06 PM

Wat

Popular Climate Science Denier accepted $1.2 mil from fossil-fuel industry

28 February 2015 - 01:45 PM

This really comes as no surprise, but interesting nonetheless.

 

 


 

..newly released documents show the extent to which Dr. Soon’s work has been tied to funding he received from corporate interests.

 

 

He has accepted more than $1.2 million in money from the fossil-fuel industry over the last decade while failing to disclose that conflict of interest in most of his scientific papers. At least 11 papers he has published since 2008 omitted such a disclosure, and in at least eight of those cases, he appears to have violated ethical guidelines of the journals that published his work.

 

The documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as “deliverables” that he completed in exchange for their money. He used the same term to describe testimony he prepared for Congress.

http://www.nytimes.c...-Soon.html?_r=0

 

 

 

 

 

 

One of his collegues is more disappointed at Soon's crappy science:

 

 


 

Taken as nothing more than a scientific talk, Dr. Soon's presentation was, in my opinion, pretty bad. I watch a lot of these things. It's part of my job. If Soon had been giving a Ph.D defense, he would have been skewered. I was left without a clear line of argument or clear justifications for his claims. More importantly, for a topic this contentious there was insufficient discussion of the voluminous and highly detailed response critics have offered to his claims that solar activity accounts for most observed climate variability. Many of my colleagues listening to the talk said they felt the same way. I came away thinking, "Is that the best they have?"

 

But more troubling was a conversation I had with Soon earlier in the day. Every scientist has the right to his or her own perspective. But scientists also understand how research communities build their understanding about what is known and how anyone knows it. So, I wondered how Soon could fail to acknowledge that the weight of evidence was overwhelmingly against him when he made his overarching public statements of skepticism. I asked Soon why his testimony to Congress did not begin with something like, "I acknowledge that the majority of researchers in my field hold a different view from me, but let me now explain why I am taking such a contrarian position."

 

When I asked Soon about these points, he had very little to say.

 

I came away from my meeting with this famous climate skeptic feeling pretty depressed. What I had seen was a scientist whose work, in my opinion, was simply not very good. That, on its own, is no big deal. There are lots of scientists whose work is not very good — and some people may even think my science should be included in that list.

 

But Soon's little string of papers were being heralded in the highest courts of public opinion as a significant blow to everyone else's understanding of Earth's climate. From TV studios to the halls of Congress, we were being told his was world-shaking research of the highest caliber, and that we had to take notice.

 

From what I saw and learned that day, the truth wasn't anywhere close. That was what made it all so depressing. For an issue so important to all of us, the standards should be a lot higher.

 

That is the real problem with Willie Soon and climate denial.

http://www.npr.org/b...climate-skeptic


Reggie Bush released

25 February 2015 - 05:15 PM

per Adam Schefter on twitter

 

 

 

Probably will end up with Oakland or something.