Mr. Scot

Saw a little bit from a radio interview with former Saints GM Randy Mueller, basically discussing how he'd handle it. His take is that it doesn't make sense to trade Wentz just because he doesn't want to be there. As a GM, he says, that doesn't really matter to him. Stated further that if Wentz wants to get paid, he'll honor his contract. GMs vary, but it wouldn't surprise me if that's a common way of thinking.

There were reports that they were shopping Carr because conditions related to his contract were more favorable to that this year than in prior years. More recently I've seen it suggested that they'd rather keep Carr and trade Mariota. You're right though. It's Gruden. Next week he'll probably be ready to start Nathan Peterman.

FYI: Saw some people on Twitter speculating that there's a work stoppage. I'm not sure that's plausible, but...

What happened to Parcells?

Just saw a report that the Ravens are planning to devote more resources to keeping Lamar Jackson upright. This whole "protecting the quarterback" thing might just be catching on.

I like Wilson but what they'd have to trade to get to that spot would probably make me cringe.

The guy that's regularly on the show with Wilson is somebody else but I remember hearing Council's name on there from time to time.

I guess I thought he was still with the station.

I haven't read the whole thread. Has last season's game against Washington been mentioned yet? (just curious)

I was actually looking for info on Twitter and found this gem. Charlotte sports radio sounds like it's a better soap opera than General Hospital.

Would they or would you be willing to let a player have a say in roster decisions though? That'd be a hard "no" for me.

I remember feeling like Hitman was probably an ass.

I know one report said they were looking to get something equivalent or close to the Stafford trade. Most people would probably agree that's too much to ask for Stafford but that surely wouldn't stop them from trying.

From what I've read they have solid offers, just not as solid as they hoped after they saw what the Lions got for Stafford. Expecting that kind of haul for a guy they benched is probably a good indicator that they're not exactly thinking clearly on this.

So now after what's been described as "intense backlash", the Post has edited the headline. Unfortunately, the first paragraph of the obituary still refers to Schottenheimer as someone who failed the lead his teams to the Super Bowl. Good Lord

Have a nice life, dude.

You think I'm trying to start another discussion about Watson here? Oy And dude, if the last word means that much to you, feel free. This argument is clearly a lot more important to you than it is to me.

Makes me wonder how much fun Dan Snyder is having with Rivera in charge.

I've been avoiding sports radio and TV since I didn't want to listen to endless blather about Brady and the Bucs, so I had no idea.

Us trading only a seventh rounder for Deshaun Watson is possible. There was a time when I read shenanigans into everything too. Over time, I found out most of it was bullsh-t and the real stories were actually a lot simpler than I had imagined them to be. That's likely true here as well.

Were they offline yesterday too?

I already tried thinking that I as a random guy on the internet knew more than people who were actually involved in things or had real inside information when I was younger. Luckily, I grew out of it.

Are you? Neither of us knows. We're just speculating on what we read. the difference is you seem to think you have more insight than the people who are actually close to and covering the situation. Yeesh

I'd find that idea a lot more credible if it happened sooner.

I'm convinced that the word of people with actual inside sources is more valuable than that of random guys on the internet with conspiracy theories.