Mr. Scot

Pickens made Claypool expendable.

McCarthy / Moore'w playcalling for that last series was sh-t.

Lady Cowboy Fan is a tad...hyper right now

Young was a passer first but also a pretty dangerous runner. As such, he was a true dual threat. A lot of guys who get called dual threats really aren't.

I believe the technical term is "utter bullsh-t".

Young was, in my opinion, the best true dual threat of all time.

Or maybe a guy named Steve Young?

Brady is more successful. That's not the same as being better.

Here's an 'outside the box' runningback option...

Shotgun isn't just a formation. Sometimes it's a passing style.

You can succeed with a "be the offense" quarterback at the college level, but not in the pros. The whole notion that you can just draft a super athletic guy and teach him all the skills he needs to become a passer is a formula for failure. Give me a guy who already understands how to pass. I don't give a sh-t if he's as athletic as Michael Vick or as big a statue as Dan Marino.

I suspect that guy's "source" is his ass.

More so than say...Kyle Boller

I remember people saying it was crazy to think Michael Vick wasn't a great quarterback. Fields might be better than Vick but the bottom line is that no matter how great a runner any quarterback is, they will succeed or fail based on how well they can pass. People have been trying to convince me that was gonna change since 2000. It still hasn't.

For the most part, they didn't. There is that one notable example, of course.

Granted, but a lot of teams still regretted passing on him. Randy Moss was another guy like that.

Have said it a dozen times: Much as I love watching us win, if I'm not invested in a season (like say, this one) then losing doesn't really feel that bad.

To be fair, we had a head coach who didn't have a "head coach mind" from that time up till a few weeks ago. I feel like we could have nailed every personnel decision since January 2020 and still been a losing team.

I'd take him over Sam Darnold

I like having a higher pick, but higher pick doesn't guarantee better pick. A smart team can find an Aaron Rodgers in the twenties while a stupid one can get a Tim Couch at #1 overall. Wherever we pick, get it right.

And I'd previously have considered Stafford on the lower end of that tier.

Allen himself is hurt too. Gotta see what happens in December though. Honestly, to me the most interesting discussion coming out of Buffalo right now is whether Ken Dorsey is still as high on people's potential head coaching lists as he used to be.

You're going to get a lot of votes for Aaron Rodgers too. Probably also others. If you expand it to all time, You'll probably get a lot of Tom Brady votes, but is he really a better quarterback than say, Manning or Brees, or was he just on better teams? The whole "who's the absolute #1 best" discussion really only matters to sports fans and talk radio guys. Give me somebody that we as a team can win with and I won't give a sh-t whether somebody thinks they're better or worse than Dan Marino or Joe Montana.