WarHeel

Dude, the fact that you think coaching is solely based on intelligence tells the story. No one said that anyone was more intelligent than anyone. Leaders can be morons. See the last 30 years of US leadership for reference.

Sad thing is I’ve met people who think this way so likely not.

These morons still haven’t figured out the difference between equity and equality but are comfortable calling people racists based on factual information because it hurts their feelings.

That took an awful lot of embellishment. Get your head out of your racial ass, my guy.

For the record our entire 53 man roster, coaches, medical staff, practice squad could be black and I literally wouldn’t give a damn. Just win.

A percentage of the general population being one ethnicity/gender/fillintheblank doesn’t generate automaticity for a leadership position. That’s exactly my point. Nothing layered to the comment. Take it for what it is and stop accusing others of doing what you’re doing.

I’d love to see the post where I said any of the sort.

Who’s bitter?

The fact that you generated that out of “let the best man win” is beyond me but not surprising.

I said the same thing when everyone on here assumed CMC wouldn’t break records because he was a “white RB.” Double standards are a helluva thing.

True. Fact of the matter is that as of about 5 years ago the league was grossly 74% minority. But nobody questions whether the white guys aren’t getting a fair shot because of the color of their skin. Everyone assumes the best players play, and I personally believe that is the case. Why we hold a different standard to coaches or other leadership is beyond me. Let the best man win. Who gives AF if he’s purple, red, or green.

Not sure what you’re talking about. Eli Manning is an ANIMAL!

Most missed calls in a SB: Broncos (2015)

That’s a bingo. Now we’re being “analytical.”

Fair enough. It was more of a playful title as we are in the midst of draft discussion, era of a new GM, and Tepper loves his “analytics.” I’ll make sure to do a paragraph long title next time like most folks on here to really drive the point across.

Could be just a rare coincidence. But SEC teams like GA and LSU are at least in the conversation of competing each year. It’s an impressive stat and if it assists with draft logic then great. One could argue relevance to the topic as it dates back so far but it’s a telling stat for program success and if I’m scouting impactful players that could get me to a SB I think this has its relevance.

I mean if we are arguing semantics sure. If the stat followed up with “no other teams have this production” then I think it’s a different story.

I’ll defer to someone with more time on their hands to investigate what the hundreds of other colleges and universities are doing in context of consecutive SB appearances but I doubt there are many with this particular stat. Regardless, it’s an interesting stat and one that I’m sure Tepper and co. might be interested in.

What context are you looking for?

I think that’s kind of the point of the stat. There probably aren’t any other schools that have had 20+ seasons of SB contenders. Hence the comparison.

It appears we need to draft a Tiger or a Bulldog.

On another note, I just want my boy McDermott back as DC.

I’ve seen articles floating around for both Stafford and Watson and all provide different teams/rationales. Tells me that no one really knows WTF is going on.