Icege

A big part of Bill Voth joining was that he would be allowed to write critically of the franchise and its players. I couldn't imagine Gantt joining if he wasn't allowed to be his usual bitchy self.

The final years on Stafford's contract look similar to Teddy's, with the difference being $33M for 2021 rather than $24M. For 2022, both QBs are set to make $26M in their final playing seasons under contract with $5M in dead cap for Teddy and $6M in dead cap for Stafford. Stafford does have a $3M dead cap number in 2023. Lions have a better salary cap situation than the Texans as well. ($3M under while HOU is $22M over). Gives the Panthers an upgrade at the position but also makes it harder to sign other talent. I'd rather see Moton's deal inked before making a move on a QB.

10. It's still Panthers football bby!!! I would be at 100 if we had a young star QB waiting to take over in 2022 (OVER 9 MILLION IF THEY GET DESHAUN)

Used to live across from the one on King St in downtown Charleston It is gutter trash

I would read when I can as the Post & Courier down in Charleston is lucky to have anything Panthers related, but that paywall is a killer.

I mean... $21M committed to him in dead cap makes it really, really hard for me to see otherwise. The team is in a reasonable position to trade up for a QB, or they can gamble on Teddy continuing to regress and shoot for Sam Howell or one of the 2022 QB free agents. The real question is: do you trade up in front of ATL?

https://health.hawaii.gov/coronavirusdisease2019/what-you-should-know/current-situation-in-hawaii/ I mean, it's public info. Not sure why you're acting like it's being kept from you. Your turn! Mind telling me why NZ has a lower infection rate and less deaths than Cuba, Philippines, Haiti which are even further away (with the exception of the Philippines)? Those are small island nations as well.

Is this where you imply that it is because NZ is an island nation while ignoring other island nations with higher COVID rates and also ignoring the fact that the US is across the entire Pacific Ocean rather than downstream like NZ is? Let me guess... we need to do like Sweden?

I don't think GIlligan's Island had a population of 4.886M while also having 3.8M tourists come through the year prior. I also don't think that 60% of the island's economy depends on imports/exports in international trade like NZ does. I do think, however, that it is hilarious that folks ignoring the NZ containment response are now trying to invalidate it since they know it destroys most of their rhetoric.

Out of curiosity, did you read any of the links that were presented or did you disregard them at the outset?

As someone who's wife is immunocompromised after her bout with Hodgkins lymphoma, it makes me irrationally angry when folks politicize masks for public health.

Works for me. Putting it back then

Thought this was the TB thread and edited it since that seemed the more appropriate CV thread for the question

Out of curiosity: What is the acceptable death rate to institute shelter-in-place practices? Also, is it the death rate or total number of deaths that matters?

Yuuup Whenn folks find out that it isn't a south east Asian phenomenom and that Switzerland is one of those countries they blue screen irl.

A majority of the people have never eaten dog meat and despite racist rhetoric, the practice of eating dog meat is not common in China. The ban is related to the trade and consumption of wild animals and their meat. The city of Shenzhen at the beginning of the month stepped up to include dogs and cats on that list, as their being domesticated would have been a loophole in the law (I believe they might have even fallen under livestock?). Unfortunately, the loopholes for traditional Chinese medicine still exists which is why bear bile will still be legal.

https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/new-zealand/auckland/historic https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/usa/charleston-sc/historic It has been warmer in Charleston county and we have seen a higher rate of infection (0.08%) than that of New Zealand (0.02%).

You're protesting against the method in which data was collected specifically for Sweden and not all countries. You're trying to differentiate between apples and oranges when we're discussing fruits. You're more than welcome to prefer to listen to whatever echos inside your chamber while questioning my intelligence. By the way... was the math incorrect? Certainly if I'm not bright enough for this discussion I should have my math checked... right? As for the Swedish population: Population of Sweden What did I put down again? Oh yea...

You forgot Australia, which used different methods from New Zealand to achieve similar percentages. I've emphasized this, despite your attempts to cherry pick and not engage in good faith. So... you believe that the USA is more like Germany due to border control, lack of testing resources, lack of contact tracing, and inability to implement lockdowns? Or do you believe that the USA is more like a landlocked country that is on the same landmass as the source of the outbreak as opposed to regions that have to be exclusively traveled to via sea/air? It can't be due to the size differences, as much as I'd like to poke fun and suggest that you believe otherwise.

You've continued to try and justify your dismissal of them based on some ever-shifting qualifying factors, but you have yet to actually address their methods. So I'll ask again: Did you or did you not read the methods that New Zealand and Australia used?

If you're entire basis is that the data is not exactly correct, then you are going to be denying every data set released during this pandemic as there is no way to determine the exact numbers in all of this (plus, what about countries like the US that did not make testing widely available early on? Or China and their likely fudged numbers?). Are those numbers for Sweden not what was being presented by the WHO yesterday? Seeing as the math is correct as well as the method, I stand by my assessment.