Jump to content

Lurk21

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    670
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lurk21

  1. I think the part missing from that presser is when he stated  "They have ti call us" when referring  to trading for a qb. That's stating that they have called teams and waiting to see if said team will finally give in. When digesting  that comment, it means....  Baker could be a possibility  but we aren't budging on our trade demands of shaving salary. It also could stand that we have reached out to Arizona and others to let them know we are open for business(when your ready to move on) at any time. 

  2. I know Bookies.com is not a source you want to take too much stock in but nobody finds it strange this stuff pops up after we complete the main 3 Qb pro days.... Could they be not too enthused and are now ramping things up. 

  3. Sounds like the Giants brass is eyeing the thought of going after a Qb next year and trying to have ample options and capital if needed to make moves. I know they are looking at money too because  of trying to trade Bradberry but they are clearly white flagging this season. 

  4. Yeah, something  definitely  doesn't  feel normal at all about the moves. Something  definitely  is going on and Scott is running things way more differently. Add to the fact we got a gambling owner... wouldn't shock me they been calling for Lamar  or Kyler as soon as we got out of running for Watson. 

  5. The only reason that makes sense... is to be going after a veteran qb(trade for a Lamar etc)with a cap hit. It seems if we going for a rookie qb, we might as well keep that young player. No need in losing talent to cover up the dumb mistake of extending Sam last year. 

  6. @MHS831 Yeah i read that and Ian also stated he thinks us over Seattle if Baker money goes down. Knowing our luck he would go to Tampa and when Brady retires, he goes back to 2020 Baker. People forget he went toe to toe with Mahomes and even helped beat Pittsburgh in the post season.  Not criwning him but the scenario fits us better because  Rhule doesnt desebe to set us back with a rookie. image.thumb.png.586b594f7204e0c0f6b0d3c6a5d46c49.pngimage.thumb.png.86f08b16a00c0a3ad09097c39efc0212.png#

  7. Just going by all the scenarios,  it has me changing my mind to giving Baker a shot. I say so because  it'd be a 1 year prove it not only for him but for Rhule. If it works out with the improvements  we have, then cool. If things go south, we are no longer tied to Baker, Darnold or Rhule. I don't like the idea of getting a rookie and then Rhule gets fired and the new regime is ready to pick HIS GUY.  

  8. I've been lurking for years but I must say... why no mentions of trading(not a 1st or etc) for  Tyler Huntley? I saw enough of dude to say he has some very similar  traits Watson (on the field)has and still on a cheaper contract. I know Baltimore  is trying to figure the Lamar stuff out but trading for Huntley is more financially  important  for us because  we still have him at a lowered cap hit. Just my 2 cents but I'm just glad to finally  have to stop refreshing  about Deshaun. 

×
×
  • Create New...