LinvilleGorge

I think the nitty gritty breakdown of throwing motions gets too geeky. Does the ball come out on time and get to where it needs to be? That's all I care about.

So basically decide if we want to trade for #1 or sign Derek Carr? I mean, it works for me.

Pretty much where I'm at.

I've heard more than a couple players hint that the feeling on Cousins around the league is that he's a guy who cares more about taking care of his stat line than winning games.

I'm trying to picture matte white in my head and it's just not working for me. If you paired it with a blue facemask maybe.

It was already trending that he might not be. I think today virtually ensured that he won't be.

I wouldn't necessarily agree with that. Slim chance that all three of the top three ultimately work out. Hopefully we don't fall for the one that doesn't.

Richardson official 4.43.

I'm in on Richardson, Stroud, or Young. Give me one of those guys and I'm thrilled. IMO, Levis is a distant #4 and I'd honestly probably rather pass and have Hooker later if it comes to that.

The sexist remark about a lady just trying to do her job was just really tacky. That's all.

@Kentucky Panther do you really need to go around pooing every post that isn't glowingly positive about Levis? I mean, it's kinda hilarious so continue if you like but it definitely makes you come across like a 12 year old.

Damn... you'd have to be very, VERY sold. I'm assuming that was a typo and "2st" should've been "1st".

Not trying to impress you. Could not possibly care less about what you think. We're just talking about these drills here.

My only question is what exactly does that mean? Do we identify a specific guy? Because that means going to #1 Do we identify say three guys that we'd be thrilled to have and that means moving up to at least #3? Are we just trying to decide if we're still in the market to try to trade for #1? I don't know.

I don't agree with her either but the nails stuff? C'mon man.

Cool. I disagree with her. That's all. Sorry that triggers you.

I mean, you don't have to take a shot at her like that. Reasonable people can simply disagree.

I agree with you on him as a runner. He's obviously a serious running threat but he doesn't have the vision, moves, or raw power as a runner that Cam had.

Did not see that. At all.

Did you actually watch the games though? Those UF receivers had tennis rackets for hands. Lots of catchable balls hit the ground for Florida last year. I'll fully admit I kinda though the se about AR until I started watching some Florida games and saw a much more polished QB than I expected to see.

Some busts but also two MVPs.

Allen ran 4.76 and Mahomes 4.8. That's not Michael Vick but that's not terrible for a QB.

You're not hurting my feelings. I mean, if you wanna keep making yourself look bad, I guess be my guest.

The dude can flat out play. As a huge UNC fan, my concerns about Downs in the NFL are: 1. Size. He's gonna be a shoehorned as a slot only guy and he faced virtually no press coverage at UNC because defenses were terrified of getting beat deep in large part because we had great deep ball throwers in Howell and Maye. 2. Durability. He didn't miss many games at UNC but he was routinely hampered by nagging injuries. 3. Giving up yards to try to gain yards. He's fully willing to give up yards to get space to try to make a move. It worked out more often than not in college but it may be a habit he'll need to break in the NFL. At the end of the day though, I expect him to be a very good NFL slot WR.

At the time end of the day to be a great QB in the NFL you gotta walk that tight rope between confident and cocky. I haven't seen any of these guys come across as bad as Josh Rosen or Brock Osweiler. Those are the only two guys I've ever written off as surefire busts simply based on how off the charts cocky they came across in the pre-draft process.