Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A look at Panthers turnover stats for the season's 1st quarter since 2015


KB_fan

Recommended Posts

As we all know, Panthers turnover stats were off the charts in 2015 and then dropped off a cliff in 2016 and 2017.

One of the very encouraging trends so far in 2018 is that the turnover stats (giveaways, takeaways, turnover differential, net points off turnovers) look A LOT closer to the 2015 numbers than the past 2 seasons.

Take a look:

1889089001_Comparativeturnoverstatistics-1stQtrofseasonsince2015.png.412e186cc635070df6fad9694d57604d.png

 

Giveaways are down.

Takeaways are up.

Panthers Defense is being very stingy on points after Panthers give up the ball, allowing ONLY 7 TOTAL points on 4 giveaways.

The Panthers Offense, however, could do with being a bit more opportunistic in scoring following takeaways..  The current rate of 3.4 points per takeaway is a bit too low.  

But otherwise, these stats are pretty dang promising!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as proof that turnover stats matter, here's another table I created in response to a follower's question twitter.  I'd been posting about Panthers success when winning the field position battle.  Someone asked if that was basically just the same thing as winning the turnover differential.  BOTH field position and winning the turnover differential each week are HUGE indicators of Panthers success:

87387856_W-LinrelationtoFieldPosandTurnoverDiffsince2015.thumb.png.48c93805ea088bdaee25e757257d499a.png

 

Panthers are an astounding 25-1 since 2015 in games when they've won the Turnover battle in a given week. 

That one loss?  Our 2016 opener in Denver.  I really maintain if we'd won that game (or hadn't had to play it at all) our 2016 season would have been very different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...