Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

position grades for the year

the greatest

By the greatest,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

the greatest Newbie

the greatest

Posted
Posted

QB- C The only reason that they get such a high grade is because of his game in San Diego and Steve Smith.

RB- A+ Arguably the best one two punch in the league and argueably the best RB in the league.

OL- B+ They don't get an A because they couldn't stay healthy which i know isn't their fault but other than that they were great.

WR- B+ Steve Smith had a great year and Muhsin Muhammad was very reliable and Dwane Jarett was good with his limited playing time.

FB- A Brad Hoover had one of his better years and it showed through our run games production.

DL- C Did pretty good with their talent level just couldn't get consistent pressure.

LB- B Two very good LB's in Beason and Davis with a solid veteran it just felt that they were held back a little.

DB- D Ugh not much u can say here consistently out of place to many dropped interceptions i think the talent is there but they just need to execute.

OC- B+ the best offence the panthers have had ever but conservitive garbage handicapped us

DC- D- Consistent lack of preparation and planning basically screwed us toward the end of the year.

HC- C Don't know why but john fox has seemed to lost his "magic"

GM- B did a good job in the draft and free agency, very impressed lets see how he does this offseason.

feel free to post your own grades or comment on mine probably a little biased due towards me being ticked off about last night. ill probably make a thread on what we should do this offseason, or try and find that other thread ond post on that one. very disappointed in the way that we ended the season. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jasonluckydog
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By jasonluckydog · Posted

      Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • TD alt
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By TD alt · Posted

      In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...