Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Optimistic for the future


Davis83

Recommended Posts

I won't get into the coaching crap - I'm optimistic for the "players".

I'm not ready to declare Jimmy as the saviour, I'm not ready to declare a 12-4 season - BUT:

I was actually interested for the entire game - that in itself is an improvement from the first 3 games. We had a chance to win right to the final seconds of the game.

Play calling still sucks at times, players are still blowing coverages or blocks, but I saw some improvement and I saw a "young team" grow a little bit.

The feeling I got yesterday was that this team is just at the cusp of coming together. Somebody just needs to step up and take over the leadership of the offense - it should be Jimmy, but he's a young rookie and it was only his 2nd game... its not HIS team yet.

Being named starter does not mean you own the team - he has to earn the respect of the veterans and I'm not so sure they are "all in" yet. No picks, no fumbles in the game will only help with that.

The game pace is obviously a lot faster than what he's used to - at times he seems to be over analyzing the defense and then has to rush the snap because the play clock is winding down - time will heal these things for him. Some of his throws dive into the ground, seems like when he gets really excited he drives the nose down. Something to work on, but better than over throw - tip - INT.

Now why am I optimistic? I look at 2 other teams in the NFL that have young teams - RAMS and LIONS.

Rams have suddenly become a threat to win and they have a rookie qb! Sometimes all it takes is a little success to get a team over the hump and then the players begin to believe and then they are on the way.

Lions have played a couple of good teams right down to the wire and let it slip away at the end. They have lost their young qb to injury - but still right on the edge. Beware when they finally pull one out - again success can be a powerful incentive.

Yesterday I saw a Panthers team that seems to be having trouble getting over the hump - I'm optimistic - might not happen this year (I hope it does), but right now we have a young QB that is growing with alot of young players around him - if/when it happens, they could be together for along time and success is a powerful medicine.

now hand over the pie!

flame away - but I remain hopeful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...