Jump to content

Darth Biscuit

HUDDLER
  • Content count

    37,671
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    33

Darth Biscuit last won the day on February 13 2017

Darth Biscuit had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

13,061 Fuggin Awesome

About Darth Biscuit

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Wilmington, NC

Converted

  • Location
    Where the boobs are... inspecting boobs since 1973.

Social Stuff

  • Twitter Handle
    @Teh_Biscuit

Recent Profile Visitors

223,005 profile views
  1. Well you know, Trump's Space Force will be at the forefront, so I wonder if they'll actually blame him? Also, the Expanse is awesome, have you read the books? The show is excellent also.
  2. He's not gonna respond to anything we've asked... and if he does it will be some "well we don't understand god" bullshit as is typical. Why is it critical? He's up there asking if we believe life came from no life. Why yes, I do actually. What does the timeline have to do with it? Well, you see if the earth is 4.5 billion years old... god waited an AWFUL long time to show up and do something and then.... disappear. Like, completely. Why is star light important? Well, we couldn't see very many if the earth was only 6,000 y.o. and they know this. ...but, but god created light too... but why'd he create it "in transit"? To pull off some big cosmic joke on us? To "test our faith"...? lol, ok... sure. SCIENCE ISN'T REAL THO, STOP IT, STOP IT, YOU CAN'T PROVE ANYTHING STTOOOOPPPPPPP...
  3. Darth Biscuit

    What’s going on in Saudi Arabia?

    I had a "discussion" with a Trumper on facebook recently who made the same claim "left censorship"... he quote that (Alex Jones), some incident at USC and some law in CANADA as "proof"... LOL
  4. He'll be back in a bit... he's off on answersingenesis trying to come up with a retort.
  5. Also, since you're neatly avoiding it, please address my star light issue.
  6. Please explain what this missing link is.
  7. What? What they'll find tomorrow is that their estimates will get better and better and your 6,000 year estimate was never even close. Did you even read what I wrote?
  8. The word "stupid" does not appear at all in my post... now does it? What does that mean? That's right... we have a winner. You called yourself stupid. I did in fact say your writing was "jumbled ass", which is a true statement.
  9. FWIW, it's... intriguing... that people who make statements such as "science can't prove anything" are also the same people that can't type grammatically correct english.
  10. Dude, whatever the fug this is is very hard to read. What? Estimates based on scientific data aren't assumptions... they are estimates. No one has ever claimed the earth's age down to the day. Scientists use radiometric dating to... estimate the earth's age. Either way, in case you're math challenged, which I'm thinking you are, there's quite a difference between 6,000 years and 4.5 Billion years. Idk wtf you're talking about King Solomon for?
  11. No, more likely because your jumbled ass writing makes no sense. You typed like 50 words with no punctuation or coherent thought apparent.
  12. SO YOU are saying that scientific tests that give estimates of the earths age (roughly 4.5Billion years) are wrong, but somehow you just KNOW that that's wrong. Also that transitional fossils are wrong, DNA analysis is wrong, but you KNOW we didn't evolve... Please tell us how you came to these conclusions that science CAN'T PROVE ANYTHING.
  13. I'm just highlighting what you said here.
  14. Yeah about what I expected. So, light travels at an exact measurable rate. We can absolutely confirm this. So... given your assumption that the earth is only 6,000 years old, we should only be able to see stars that are within 6,000 light years of Earth. Again, absolutely provable and utterly without dispute of any kind. Except... we can see stars much, much, MUCH incredibly farther away... as far as 13 BILLION light years away. Hmmm... how is that I wonder? ...and LOLOLOL, did you even read the article YOU posted? Here, let me excerpt it for you... So even if carbon dating is accurate to "only" 62000 years ago, that blows YOUR estiamte WAY out of the water... You proved yourself wrong. Thanks.
  15. lol. "they" think carbon dating is accurate but genius here KNOWS a 2000+ year old book that's been mistranslated 14,000 times is fact. LOLOLOLOL Answer my question, if the earth is 6,000 years old, how can we see the stars?
×