every brown touchdown i recall last year was him falling backwards with the ball bouncing into his cradled chest and managing to stick. maybe my memory has a selection bias but i can't remember ever see him make the archetypical over-the-shoulder catch or the outstretched hands grabs necessary to play receiver in this league. those are all coaching issues and tbh it's a blight on ricky proehl that his mechanics are this bad. we're not cutting corey brown though. dude is an unbelievably good route runner and seems to constantly find himself wide open. i don't know that he'll ever become a number one in this league, or even a number two, but i think he'll improve as the year progresses.
happens every year. a kid from nantucket community college trucks an UDFA from southwestern billings divinity school and everyone thinks he's gonna roll in and take the world by storm, and GM-douche of choice is a raging dumbcunt for cutting the guy (who invariably ends up in a career with geico by next august anyway, despite everyone's prediction that 31 other times will fight each other to scoop him up.)
nice writeup mr scot. i'd like to add that fozzy made his case by both being an awesome blocker in pass support and keeping those legs churning through the pile against the first-team superbowl champion patriots defense. fozzy makes big plays when it counts and this should be remembered when the masses insist on replacing him with the latest running back version of jeremy leman.
mehhh. going into the season we joyfully boasted about how gettles turned the WR position into a formidable strength of the offense. then we lost KB and we haven't seen funch assume the primary role in any games (because he's been injured.) if corey brown and jericho cotchery were actually our starting receivers several years into gettleman's reign i would be concerned.
it is standard argumentative policy to cite your sources when you make a weighted claim, especially one based on quantitative data like yours. it's a tinderbox standard as well. if you don't cite your source no one will take you seriously, in this life or the next
lol can we take this is a capitulation of any attempt to have a meaningful argument? you've switched gears from "here's some stats" to "well you NEED A GUN TO KILL PEOPLE WITH GUNS" when asked for your source for those stats and it's obvious to everyone in this thread