Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

stirs

Lois Lerner vs Richard Nixon

167 posts in this topic

Again zero facts inserted, just name calling. Getting old.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One word Sonasoft. Let's not get off course children.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey my dog ate my facts again! Does that work?

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least the IRS refused Nixon who wanted to use if against his political enemies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You may have ignored the part where it was estimated that a proper email archiving system would have cost 10 million dollars, and there was no requirement for it apparently, but yeah keep yelling about a backup product line their IT staff never heard of the term.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You may have ignored the part where it was estimated that a proper email archiving system would have cost 10 million dollars, and there was no requirement for it apparently, but yeah keep yelling about a backup product line their IT staff never heard of the term.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Excuses excuses is what I hear from you. Seven years to keep emails bruh. Working for the NCDOR we have what we call Retain, what is the excuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I already asked what the IRS email retention policy is, no one here knows but everyone seems able to say that they didn't follow a rule on retention or there's a vast conspiracy going on.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I already asked what the IRS email retention policy is, no one here knows but everyone seems able to say that they didn't follow a rule on retention or there's a vast conspiracy going on.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Already posted earlier, here you go.

http://www.irs.gov/irm/part1/irm_01-015-006.html#d0e438

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great, there's no word on how long things must be kept.

 

But clearly if deliberate tampering is found, and records were deleted, then someone broke the law.

 

But in any case, President Obama did not call the IRS and ask them to do any of this. That's a dumb thing to think, Lots of risk for no real reward, what would be the point? Think freaking logically instead of like how Fox News thinks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Same people defending Hillary a few months ago are now drawing the conclusion that Flynn... and by association Trump... must be guilty of something because Flynn is getting immunity from the FBI. Works both ways. For the record... IMHO both Hillary and Trump are crooks.  If justice in this nation were truly blind these two politicians and their henchmen would be doing a long stretch in prison by now.
    • Slot receivers don't exist in 2 TE sets unless we're lining a TE on the outside which I haven't seen much out of the currently constructed Panthers. Maybe McCaffrey if he were to be split out wide but the Panthers usually keep a RB with Cam in-case Cam needs the extra protection and audibles the RB to block.  The Panthers would be best suited pairing KB with a speedster such as Charles Johnson, who's adept at running deep routes. Keep Howard and possible the RB (if not blocking) on short routes, KB on working the intermediate routes, Olsen running intermediate/deep routes, and Johnson running deep routes. That way Cam has a receiver on every level. All of this assumes Shula constructs a properly worked passing attack. 
    • Yes, that is correct. My point being Clinton was impeached and stayed in office. Almost everyone calling for impeachment of Trump thinks it means to remove him from office. He would have to be impeached and then found guilty to do that. The impeachment alone does not remove him. And my original point, no one was bringing up the electoral college back then. It makes no sense. Because the popular would surely rid us of corrupt politicians, right?