Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

blackandgold10

Final comments from BlackandGold10

32 posts in this topic

to terminate the potential for any more incessant Jake Delhomme gushing before it gets started...again, consider this.

A Jake-less Smitty still makes the pro bowl, still gets a hundred catches, and still is a superstar.

A Smitty-less Jake is a Jake on the bench staring at retirement several years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to terminate the potential for any more incessant Jake Delhomme gushing before it gets started...again, consider this.

A Jake-less Smitty still makes the pro bowl, still gets a hundred catches, and still is a superstar.

A Smitty-less Jake is a Jake on the bench staring at retirement several years ago.

rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to terminate the potential for any more incessant Jake Delhomme gushing before it gets started...again, consider this.

A Jake-less Smitty still makes the pro bowl, still gets a hundred catches, and still is a superstar.

A Smitty-less Jake is a Jake on the bench staring at retirement several years ago.

Uh. In 2007 without Jake, Smitty did not make the pro bowl, did not get any records.

In the year without Smitty, Jake was still winning games.

Your logic for those statements, if there is any, escapes me. :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh. In 2007 without Jake, Smitty did not make the pro bowl, did not get any records.

In the year without Smitty, Jake was still winning games.

Your logic for those statements, if there is any, escapes me. :confused:

"the year"

"still winning games"

You don't even believe yourself do you? Single out a segment of history and make a feeble slap at fact if you wish but I think you got the point based off of that flimsy attempt at a retort that resulted in miserable failure.

If you actually think Jake would have a better career without Smitty than Smitty would have without Jake please respond. If not...go back to bed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Drew Brees is not the best QB in the NFL for two reasons:

1- His home/road splits. Until he can improve on the road, the Saints will not progress any further.

2- He hasn't won anything.

Brees chasing Marino is very fitting, indeed. Both QBs could put up ungodly numbers, but at the end of the year, they are watching the playoffs from the comfort of their living rooms.

Trgovac does need to go, but it's apparent that Fox's conservative style *could be* holding the OC and DC in check. The Saints picked up the blitzes, for the most part, because the defense is so damned predictable. It's playoff time, boys, time to shake things up a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"the year"

"still winning games"

You don't even believe yourself do you? Single out a segment of history and make a feeble slap at fact if you wish but I think you got the point based off of that flimsy attempt at a retort that resulted in miserable failure.

If you actually think Jake would have a better career without Smitty than Smitty would have without Jake please respond. If not...go back to bed.

Making general statements as if, just because you type them, they are fact and truth.

Then slamming anyone who has the audacity to ask a question. Which means you doubted what you typed to begin with.

You remain the a$$ you always have been.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Making general statements as if, just because you type them, they are fact and truth.

Then slamming anyone who has the audacity to ask a question. Which means you doubted what you typed to begin with.

You remain the a$$ you always have been.

Sorry. It looks like I have drawn the wrong type of fan here. And I told you not to respond unless, well you obviously read it so that IN FACT makes you look pretty stupid.

I wish I could tell you that you are the same thing you have always been or whatever but frankly I do not recognize your SN and therefore have no frame of reference for you. But since you have branded yourself as the person who believes Smitty without Jake would not be as good as Jake without Smitty, I just may remember you in the future.

After all, how often does someone say something that stupid.

..that last question was rhetorical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eight salient observations about your saints.

1. You suck.

2. You suck.

3. You suck.

4. You suck.

5. You suck.

6. You suck.

7. You suck.

8. You suck and you are not in the playoffs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty good comments. I disagree about Jake. He may not be pretty....but he wins. He bleeds Panther blue.

That can't be healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites