Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Happy Panther

Hey look at these fatasses!

18 posts in this topic

Maybe it’s just me, but I could have sworn that some of the ladies who showed up at the Golden Globes on Sunday had put on a little weight. It’s almost criminal to name names, because the very actresses whose body-mass indexes have been the subject of endless tabloid speculation are the very ones now sporting sexier curves. You could definitely see the difference if you concentrated solely on the upper arms. Instead of a Barbie-doll circumference, there was suddenly, amazingly, a womanly roundness to their frames. More Marilyn than Twiggy, that’s for sure.

http://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/18/now-scrutinizing-a-rounder-golden-globes/

jerk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sexy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I saw that. What a bunch of poo! I though Jen looked great! And Kate Hudson needs some meat in her...I mean on her... I mean I'd fug her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jen is hot as hell... some of those hollywood chicks do need to put on some weight... that bone thin look is stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer curves, but some girls wear the super thin look well. Alessandra Ambrosio, for instance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its one of my top mystery why hollywood/everyone wants females to be -3 in size? its not natural, plus those ladies have no energy unless on coke or other uppers. plus they turn into super bitachs, cause they constantly feel like poo. headaches, hungry, sick, dizzy, dehydration, etc. its not hot look.

keira_narrowweb__300x587,0.jpg "o I'm full, I just eat half a trisket"

im scared if I touch her, she break all sort of bones. time for the old way to make a comeback.

Marilyn_Monroe_famous_blown_up_dress_picture.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Marilyn_Monroe_famous_blown_up_dress_picture.jpg

Is it me, or does her face/make-up look freaking scary in that pic? Kinda like this Beaut below...

ScaryClown.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

anybody see a pic of what Lohan was wearing to this event. i saw it the other night while channel surfing. it was a black dress with shear stripes. it looked like it showed her nips. can't find a pic of it though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

anybody see a pic of what Lohan was wearing to this event. i saw it the other night while channel surfing. it was a black dress with shear stripes. it looked like it showed her nips. can't find a pic of it though.

This is what I get when I searched for her at this event...

article-1244237-07E6EDCD000005DC-962_233x536.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Because it is a party's nominee.  They should best prescribe how to pick their own nominees shouldn't they? I mean, personally I like the way NC does it.  Unaffiliated get to choose their primary ballot.  That is my personal preference. Some states do a "top two" primary for state elections where all candidates are on the ballot and top two vote getters then are sent to general election regardless of party.  That might be more to your liking but they can't really do that for presidential primary. There are several States that have primary rules I don't like, but all I am saying is that Democratic party is much more likely to be inclusive in their primaries than Republicans when decision is left to the parties and not state law.   And where it is determined by state law it applies to both parties so neither are gaining or losing an advantage by those laws.  That is my main point  


    • Is that the field with the robotic sphincter for a roof that is not dilating properly?


      Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
    • Yeah back when it was worth watching