Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Panthers interested in Jason Campbell


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
214 replies to this topic

#1 Kevin Greene

Kevin Greene

    __YOU CAN'T FIRE ME!__

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,227 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:25 AM

Report: Five teams interested in Jason Campbell

Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on April 5, 2010 10:19 AM ET
It's only a matter of time before Jason Campbell gets traded from the Redskins.

ESPN 980 in Washington reports there are five teams already interested: Buffalo, Carolina, Oakland, Jacksonville & an unknown team.



..

#2 Swarly

Swarly

    MichaelJordanLaughing.gif

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,221 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:26 AM

Posted Image

#3 scpanther22

scpanther22

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,230 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:26 AM

I would not mind..but no 5th round pick..and a 4th is too high

#4 Samuel L. Jackson

Samuel L. Jackson

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,407 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:31 AM

If this happens, I am a goddamn genius...

I ain't even gonna go back that far and dig up those predictions...

You know how it might just play out... We send Marshall to Philly for a 2nd or 3rd and a 4th or 5th, and in return send that 4th or 5th to Washingon...

It's almost going to be a 3 way trade involving McNabb, Campbell, and Marshall...

IF it works out like that...

#5 grateflday

grateflday

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,446 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:32 AM

I am all for bringin in Campbell.............. He is not that bad as people think. He is a good option to have on the roster and compete. Lets not forget the two lost season the past three because all the Panthers had was Jake. Having to many QB's on the roster that can start is never a bad thing. And if Moore crumbles or cant beat out Campbell than he doesnt deserve to be the starter. Many people complained Jake never had a QB on the roster pushing him so lets not make the same mistake with Moore.

I am ALL for bringing in Campbell.

#6 scpanther22

scpanther22

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,230 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:34 AM

If this happens, I am a goddamn genius...

I ain't even gonna go back that far and dig up those predictions...

You know how it might just play out... We send Marshall to Philly for a 2nd or 3rd and a 4th or 5th, and in return send that 4th or 5th to Washingon...

It's almost going to be a 3 way trade involving McNabb, Campbell, and Marshall...

IF it works out like that...


you love to gloat dont you?lol

#7 Future Of The Franchise

Future Of The Franchise

    The Ambassador of Booty

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,837 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:35 AM

It was only a matter of time before this subject popped up like a pimple on the face of a 16 yr old McDonald's employee.

#8 Samuel L. Jackson

Samuel L. Jackson

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,407 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:36 AM

you love to gloat dont you?lol


Hey, it just builds up all of some people's jealousy enough so that they can beat me up when I'm wrong!

;)

#9 Sam Mills Fan

Sam Mills Fan

    The Truth Sometimes Hurts

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,382 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:36 AM

Nothing says "faith in Matt Moore" and wanting to make sure he's not looking over his shoulder than bringing in a young guy that's been a starter for several years elsewhere.

This would be a very stupid move, so I fully expect it to happen.

#10 Swarly

Swarly

    MichaelJordanLaughing.gif

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,221 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:37 AM

You guys realize he has a 1st and 3rd round tender, right? I don't understand why you'd want to give up ANYTHING for him when he'd just be a backup. If he was a free agent, then sure bring him in. but giving up picks, or players for him is just dumb when we already have our quarterback.

and SLJ, I don't know if you just don't like Richard Marshall or are just making predictions about what you think may happen, but why would you want to give him up for a backup QB? Richard Marshall was apart of the #4 ranked pass defense, and I don't want to see that secondary disrupted as it's one of the most experienced set of players we have. He's an excellent #2 corner, and isn't worth trading.

edit- and I'm not saying Campbell is bad, I think he's had a rough tenure playing for the Skins behind a bad offensive line and a constantly changing offense.. but I just don't understand why people can't trust Moore. He's done just about everything he could possibly do to prove he's ready for the starting job. Gotta give the guy a chance.

#11 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,460 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:38 AM

Nothing says "faith in Matt Moore" and wanting to make sure he's not looking over his shoulder than bringing in a young guy that's been a starter for several years elsewhere.

This would be a very stupid move, so I fully expect it to happen.


It would be a very SMART move.

Just because you have faith in a QB does not mean that you do not have a solid and able back-up. Doing THAT would be a stupid move.

#12 Samuel L. Jackson

Samuel L. Jackson

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,407 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:38 AM

Healthy competition will drive Moore to be the best he can be...

...and honestly, would you feel comfortable with only Cantwell behind Moore?

This move, if we make it, would allow us to skip on drafting a QB at all, and would allow us to focus on bigger needs earlier on...

#13 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,460 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:38 AM

You guys realize he has a 1st and 3rd round tender, right? I don't understand why you'd want to give up ANYTHING for him when he'd just be a backup. If he was a free agent, then sure bring him in. but giving up picks, or players for him is just dumb when we already have our quarterback.

and SLJ, I don't know if you just don't like Richard Marshall or are just making predictions about what you think may happen, but why would you want to give him up for a backup QB? Richard Marshall was apart of the #4 ranked pass defense, and I don't want to see that secondary disrupted as it's one of the most experienced set of players we have. He's an excellent #2 corner, and isn't worth trading.


He will get moved for SIGNIFICANTLY less than his tender. I say he moves for no more than a 4th round pick.

#14 Samuel L. Jackson

Samuel L. Jackson

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,407 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:41 AM

You guys realize he has a 1st and 3rd round tender, right? I don't understand why you'd want to give up ANYTHING for him when he'd just be a backup. If he was a free agent, then sure bring him in. but giving up picks, or players for him is just dumb when we already have our quarterback.

and SLJ, I don't know if you just don't like Richard Marshall or are just making predictions about what you think may happen, but why would you want to give him up for a backup QB? Richard Marshall was apart of the #4 ranked pass defense, and I don't want to see that secondary disrupted as it's one of the most experienced set of players we have. He's an excellent #2 corner, and isn't worth trading.


It isn't that I don't like Marshall or anything like that...

I see it as this...

Richard Marshall is a great nickel corner... But he leaves a little to be desired as a starter... Ron Meeks' system had a lot more to do with our pass defense ranking than Richard Marshall...

Plus, I think we want to draft a CB in the 3rd or 4th round, or give Munnerlyn or Martin a shot at moving into the #2 spot... We invested a lot in Martin just for him to come in and be a backup FS... Just saying...

#15 CharlotteBeer.com

CharlotteBeer.com

    Resident Beer Nerd

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,700 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:42 AM

Nothing says "faith in Matt Moore" and wanting to make sure he's not looking over his shoulder than bringing in a young guy that's been a starter for several years elsewhere.

This would be a very stupid move, so I fully expect it to happen.


I don't know. I mean, assuming they still want Moore to start, is there a better option for a backup quarterback out there?


Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com