Oh, I am capable of seeing the big picture as everyone else but you is. David Lee put up 20 points and 12 rebounds against the Magic so he is capable of playing against Howard. The Knicks like the Timberwolves have no perimeter threat, all of their game comes from the Center and Forward position. As far as Lee not being able to bang well that statement is ludicrous because Lee averaged 2.4 rebounds more than Jefferson. The sad part about that is Jefferson has an 1 inch and 15 lbs. on Lee. Also the Magic is one of the teams the Bobcats play so we're not going after a player for the main reason of stopping another. With Lee being supported by "S-Jax", "The Force", and "TNT" the Bobcats would capture on their lack of size for quickness, toughness, and pure athleticism. David Lee is far more athletic than Jefferson. He is quicker and reacts faster, if I wanted a player like A.J. I would have called Fat Albert.
Quit arguing with me, your points are null in void, starting with your statement that David Lee a 2009/2010 NBA All-Star sucks.
You are a crazy, psychotic, dumb @ss that does not comprehend the slightest concept of basketball.
As soon as I saw you mention "20 AND 12", I stopped reading your post, because you still don't get it.
Numbers never tell the entire story, MORON.
I bet you believe those **NUMBERS** mean that Lee is a better player than Jefferson who averaged 17 and 9, don't you?
I bet you believe those **NUMBERS** mean that Lee would be a better fit for the Bobcats, don't you?
After all, 20 and 12 is statistically greater than 17 and 9.
By that logic, Kobe Bryant can't be the best player in the league unless he leads the league in scoring.
By your logic, the NBA Champion will always be the team that finishes the season with the best record.
NOTHINGGGGGGGGGGG else could have determined those records. Nothing that might be more important during the Playoffs, right? Best record must mean best team, right?
Better stats must mean better option, right?
WRONG, fool. You must be a caveman with that simpleminded view of reality.
Pau Gasol and Dwight Howard both only averaged 18 points, and 11 and 13 rebounds, respectively, this season. Is David Lee better than both of them, just because he might not have had as much help on his team as they did?
Did Lee's 20 and 12 produce better outcomes than Howard's 18 and 13? Likewise, do you believe Jefferson's 17 and 9 is the reason the Timberwolves were terrible?
LEARN CONTEXT, OKAY?!?
Give it up dude. Your SHORTSIGHTED fixation on numbers, and your inability to understand what creates a "BEST FIT" for a player on a team, i.e., the Bobcats makes you a terrible strategist.
A "BANGER" inside is a better fit for the Bobcats than a "SLASHING", clean up guy like David Lee. David Lee plays just like Bird Man, but most smart organizations would prefer to start a banger like Nene instead.
No different here. For the Bobcats: Jefferson > Lee.
End of discussion. Call me crazy. What I'm saying is still true. Your numbers are lying to you.
Edited by EC123, 05 July 2010 - 07:27 PM.