Jump to content

- - - - -

Braves - Phillies: Who's better?

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
17 replies to this topic

#16 c0r


    First 9

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 906 posts

Posted 24 September 2010 - 08:11 AM

The Philles have Halladay. No, I don't consider the big 3 the big 3 because Hammels got LIT UP earlier in the season by the Braves and some other teams, and Oswalt is nothing more than a slightly above average starter. Halladay's record should be better, but a weak lineup in his past few starts or so haven't given him any run support. 2.17 ERA and only 13-8. Should be better for what many people consider to be the best pitcher in the NL.


Over his past five starts, Hamels is 5-0 with a 0.49 ERA. That's two runs and just 18 hits allowed in 36 2/3 innings pitched, with 35 strikeouts.

And the Phillies have won 10 straight games that Oswalt has started. are they the big three now??

#17 fitty76


    Senior Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,597 posts

Posted 28 September 2010 - 04:41 PM

Can't believe people actually said the Braves were better!

#18 hepcat



  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,820 posts

Posted 29 September 2010 - 09:15 AM

Yea it's Phillies out of the NL this year and either Tampa or NY (that'll be a close ALCS)

can't touch that Philly pitching, they're loaded

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com