Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Will Edwards be activated?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
45 replies to this topic

#1 OneBadassCat

OneBadassCat

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,082
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:08 PM

I have a feeling he might see the field this week. I think they've got to try everything they can to win this week. Armanti is a play maker so I think they may give him a shot. What do you guys think?

#2 Jrock3016

Jrock3016

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 29-December 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 209
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:10 PM

I have a feeling he might see the field this week. I think they've got to try everything they can to win this week. Armanti is a play maker so I think they may give him a shot. What do you guys think?


If he can't run a route than no...but it would be nice to have more than 3 receivers dressed

#3 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,184
  • Reputation: 6,112
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:11 PM

I dont see why they shouldnt activate him. You dont learn much in street clothes. All though. I wouldn't put him back there on punt returns. I would use him for a couple of smoke passes or even an end around. see what he can do.

#4 CatMan72

CatMan72

    KEEP POUNDING

  • Joined: 04-January 09
  • posts: 15,545
  • Reputation: 2,796
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:11 PM

At this point why not... run the kid on a few reverses and break out the Mountaineer package.

What do we have to lose?

#5 PantherBrew

PantherBrew

    Educated White Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 6,234
  • Reputation: 1,073
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:12 PM

I dont see why they shouldnt activate him. You dont learn much in street clothes. All though. I wouldn't put him back there on punt returns. I would use him for a couple of smoke passes or even an end around. see what he can do.


I cant believe I am saying this.

But I agree.

#6 OnlyPantherFaninMaine

OnlyPantherFaninMaine

    All In.

  • Joined: 04-September 09
  • posts: 6,827
  • Reputation: 3,360
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:12 PM

At some point or another AE needs to be activated. There is no denying his athleticism, I just want to see the ball in his hands a couple times a game. But in reality, who knows what Fox and co. are thinking these days.

#7 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,184
  • Reputation: 6,112
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:13 PM

if they dont play him he will become our new Dwayne Jarrett.

#8 CLTPanther

CLTPanther

    This Space for Rent

  • Joined: 12-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,953
  • Reputation: 393
HUDDLER

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:14 PM

I agree. Sad when we are talking about activating a WR that was a QB last year cuz everyone else sucks

#9 DaveThePanther2008

DaveThePanther2008

    Gonna live and die as a faithful Panther Fan

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,624
  • Reputation: 898
HUDDLER

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:15 PM

I am all for dressing Edwards. We could use a playmaker After the Catch. Most of our receptions had very little after the catch except Goodson.

Davidson needs to get his head out of the cloud and get imaginative. He has the talent just needs to use them.

#10 bigjohn

bigjohn

    Block and Tackle

  • Joined: 18-January 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 858
  • Reputation: 248
HUDDLER

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:15 PM

I'd like to see him in the slot this weekend, no doubt....he didn't look terrible there in the preseason.