Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

The Panthers STILL need WR help.


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
60 replies to this topic

#13 Chubbs McGee

Chubbs McGee

    I will bite your face off

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 240
  • Reputation: 0
HUDDLER

Posted 24 January 2009 - 09:38 PM

WE Shouald trade for Ch ad Ocho Cinco!!1! Wait, juist hear me out!!

-He had a mohawk onnce
-He has gold teeth
-His name is ocho cinco...and his jersey number is 85...get it? GET IT? HAHa!!

#14 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 23,824
  • Reputation: 3,106
HUDDLER

Posted 24 January 2009 - 09:47 PM

Don't get me wrong. I like the O. But I said all during the season about needing someone else to emerge.
SS was blanketed all night vs AZ. You have Moose running a hot route and going deep is what the OTHER team wants you to do.
That is not his strength.

#15 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,823
  • Reputation: 6,826
SUPPORTER

Posted 24 January 2009 - 09:58 PM

Normally, year 3 for a WR is the breakout year.
But also, a WR is usually the EASIEST postion to hit the ground running in.
I'm worried about him.



You mean RB is the easiest- WR's normally take a couple of seasons to develop for a reason. I like Jarrett and thought he played well, Jake rarely goes that far in his progressions. Jarrett will play a bigger role next year.

As for getting another receiver, I'd like to see Moore, Robinson or Carter step up as small, fast, slot guys. I'm more worried about replacing Smith or at least adding another big play guy to the passing game.

#16 Russell

Russell

    Stop the bleeding.

  • Joined: 16-January 09
  • PipPip
  • posts: 61
  • Reputation: 0
ROOKIE

Posted 25 January 2009 - 12:07 AM

We'll be fine at WR. It's not like Jake is spreading the wealth. I think that gps locking device he has on smith can be attributed to the progression, or lack thereof, concerning Jarret. In Jarret's defense he made key 3rd down conversions and when he actually got a chance to play looked good. I'd also give Hackett another year. Lets remember that the style of offense we run is predicated off the run. It's not like we're running an offense like lets say the cards, Chargers, or Colts where Jake is chucking it down field 85% of the time. However he does chuck it to smith most of the time when we do throw it, even into double triple coverage-- that's the problem.
I honestly don't see any GLARING weaknesses in our offense and am pretty optimistic about it going into next season.

#17 beastson

beastson

    Philly Cheese Steak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,801
  • Reputation: 1,850
HUDDLER

Posted 25 January 2009 - 02:09 AM

First we need a offense that uses 3-4 WR. effectively

#18 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 48,131
  • Reputation: 15,636
SUPPORTER

Posted 25 January 2009 - 02:15 AM

Put a Jason Witten/Todd Heap type TE out there that is a solid blocker while also being a legitimate receiving threat and I'm fine going into next year with the receivers we have now.

#19 Fiz

Fiz

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,063
  • Reputation: 878
HUDDLER

Posted 25 January 2009 - 02:17 AM

But also, a WR is usually the EASIEST postion to hit the ground running in.


im trying to think of a way you could be more wrong

maybe if you had said quarterback

#20 Fiz

Fiz

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,063
  • Reputation: 878
HUDDLER

Posted 25 January 2009 - 02:18 AM

like seriously how do you say this

Normally, year 3 for a WR is the breakout year.

then this

But also, a WR is usually the EASIEST postion to hit the ground running in.

and think "hmm yase this is a good post"

#21 Jangler

Jangler

    oddly perched

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 49,581
  • Reputation: 10,074
HUDDLER

Posted 25 January 2009 - 02:20 AM

First we need a offense that uses 3-4 WR. effectively


First we need a QB that can see 3-4 WRs. Maybe the new QB coach will help with that.

#22 beastson

beastson

    Philly Cheese Steak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,801
  • Reputation: 1,850
HUDDLER

Posted 25 January 2009 - 02:30 AM

I disagree

Last year Jake threw to them. Just couldn't catch

This year we just threw to Moose and Smith, and ran ran and ran

I think he throws where you tell him to throw to. Run plays for others, he throw to them

#23 ladypanther

ladypanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 5,336
  • Reputation: 1,608
SUPPORTER

Posted 25 January 2009 - 08:40 AM

We we will be fine at WR. Moose has a couple of good years, at least, left in him. Jarrett looked good when he got touches. Carter and Robinson will be back. Maybe Rip can help Jake to spread the ball around a little.

#24 panth3rz72

panth3rz72

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 25-January 09
  • Pip
  • posts: 1
  • Reputation: 0
ROOKIE

Posted 25 January 2009 - 09:31 AM

i agree. moose only has about 1 or 2 years left. i have an idea that will help us with our qb problem. Trade moose and peppers for an awesome qb. someone like mcnabb. OR, an awesome wide reciever like larry fitzgerald. Then In the draft get whichever position you didnt trade for, and a corner back.