Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Andrew Luck News & Updates


  • Please log in to reply
717 replies to this topic

#151 SmootsDaddy89

SmootsDaddy89

    Just Say No To Boo

  • ALL-PRO
  • 10,204 posts

Posted 12 December 2010 - 07:38 PM

That's what she said.

#152 RudieCantFail

RudieCantFail

    Junior Member

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 38 posts
  • LocationBrooklyn, NY

Posted 12 December 2010 - 07:54 PM

neg rep me if this is a dumb question, but lets say there is a lockout next year and luck does choose to come out, wouldnt he be able to finish school during the lockout and have a big ass contract?

#153 mav1234

mav1234

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,506 posts

Posted 12 December 2010 - 08:08 PM

Is anyone else a little worried with just how high the praise is for Luck? Seems too good to be true. :(

I imagine Luck could go back to school if there was a lockout, Rudie.

#154 Grammer

Grammer

    Troll. Ignore Me.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,371 posts

Posted 12 December 2010 - 09:28 PM

Is anyone else a little worried with just how high the praise is for Luck? Seems too good to be true. :(

I imagine Luck could go back to school if there was a lockout, Rudie.


he could be the next ryan leaf/david carr/jimmy clausen... but you gotta take chances

#155 Cam El

Cam El

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 203 posts
  • LocationVirginia

Posted 12 December 2010 - 10:31 PM



or just watch this



and this


Those are nice highlights of Stanford WRs. I saw one single deep ball that the didnt WRs have to jump or come back for and that one the guy had to lay out for. A lot of those would be INTs in the NFL. Seriously watch the ball placement.

#156 Fiz

Fiz

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,974 posts

Posted 12 December 2010 - 11:31 PM




this guy knows what he's talking about guys.


unironically agree

#157 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,541 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 12 December 2010 - 11:36 PM

KT doesn't quite look like I'd have expected.

#158 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Moderators
  • -29,635 posts

Posted 12 December 2010 - 11:43 PM




this guy knows what he's talking about guys.

:lol: that guys a moron.

#159 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,869 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 12 December 2010 - 11:43 PM

all this coming from a guy who feels the need to plaster "success" on his mirror.

#160 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Moderators
  • -29,635 posts

Posted 12 December 2010 - 11:52 PM

neg rep me if this is a dumb question, but lets say there is a lockout next year and luck does choose to come out, wouldnt he be able to finish school during the lockout and have a big ass contract?

Is anyone else a little worried with just how high the praise is for Luck? Seems too good to be true. :(

I imagine Luck could go back to school if there was a lockout, Rudie.

i've said this a million times (take or give a few hundred thousand)....there is zero incentive for luck to stay if there is a lockout.

if he goes back to school as opposed to declaring for the draft, he increases his chances of falling in the draft because of poor performance/stats or injury. that is a HUGE risk.

the draft is going to happen in 2011 regardless of what happens with the CBA. if he declares, he's going to get drafted. there is no doubt of that. he is going to get drafted incredibly early...there is also no doubt about that. it's harder to become even hotter a prospect than he is right now. when you are lractically a lock for the #1 overall pick, you don't wait around hoping you can go higher later, ther is nothing higher.

so what if he doesn't get paid right away? he's still going to be getting paid as the #1 pick anyway. it may be a few months later....but contracts for #1 overall usually don't get locked up until training camp starts anyway. there would be lots of time to get it all squared away.

if he decides to stay, what does he have to gain? education can come at anytime. if there is no football, he can still finish school and have been drafted. he just wouldn't be able to play football for stanford.

#161 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,541 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 12 December 2010 - 11:56 PM

You can make an argument for Cam Newton, but Mallett? Come on :nonod:

Of course, if you're going to go online with football opinions, it'd help if you actually talked about something that made sense as opposed to saying he's not a franchise QB because "he just isn't", calling him a dork, spouting ESPN conspiracy theories and talking like a third grader :lol:

Pretty sure nobody in the NFL consults ESPN about who they ought to draft.

(except maybe Bill Tobin)

Edited by Mr Scot, 13 December 2010 - 12:07 AM.


#162 Fox007

Fox007

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,290 posts

Posted 13 December 2010 - 12:08 AM

Yea that video was stupid.
Ok guys let's not draft Luck because some fat youtube guy kept saying "Luck no, just no" over and over again.

If we end up with the 2nd overall instead of first, then we can consider Newton.

#163 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,541 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 13 December 2010 - 12:15 AM

Yea that video was stupid.
Ok guys let's not draft Luck because some fat youtube guy kept saying "Luck no, just no" over and over again.

If we end up with the 2nd overall instead of first, then we can consider Newton.

No one considering the possibility that the Bengals could choose Newton instead?

Style-wise, Luck is essentially a better version of Palmer. If they really wanted to go in a different direction, why not go for Newton?

#164 Fox007

Fox007

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,290 posts

Posted 13 December 2010 - 01:00 AM

No one considering the possibility that the Bengals could choose Newton instead?

Style-wise, Luck is essentially a better version of Palmer. If they really wanted to go in a different direction, why not go for Newton?


I suppose they could, and I would hope in that situation that they would, for our sake.

#165 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 38,541 posts
  • LocationSC

Posted 13 December 2010 - 01:04 AM

Newton vs Luck could be this year's Manning/Leaf debate.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com