Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Nasa caught faking numbers for Global warming again!

69 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

One of the big threats from the global warming moonbat types is that a rise in temperature will melt the polar ice caps causing the oceans to rise, with the cataclysmic result of skyscrapers being under water. Let’s face it, if you think that the commute into Manhattan is bad now….just wait.

There is only one problem with this scenario, Mother Nature isn’t being cooperative. You see it is true that sea level has risen during the 20th century and probably well before that. Scientists estimate that sea level has increased by 7 inches during the 2oth century.

The climate change hoaxers use computer models to predict that sea levels would rise anywhere from 15 inches to 2o feet because of global warming in the 21st century (the consensus number is closer to 3 feet).

But Mother Nature was never good at computer science. Satellite data proved that the first decade of the 21st century sea level grew by only 0.83 inches (a pace of just 8 inches for the entire century). What’s even worse (for the global warming hoaxers) there has been no rise since 2006. Now I know that some Democrats believe that Obama is a miracle worker, but even the the crazies at the Daily Kos would admit that controlling sea level is way above his pay grade. So the scientists at the University of Colorado’s NASA-funded Sea Level Research Group did what any other self-respecting cult members would do, they fudged the numbers. They simply added .3 millimeters per year to its Global Mean Sea Level Time Series. That way they could report that the sea level rise was accelerating, instead of what was actually happening–decelerating.

More number faking is discussed in the article.

http://biggovernment.com/jdunetz/2011/05/13/nasa-gets-caught-faking-climate-change-data-again/

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

these scientists are always going to try to create a buzz with global warming. The scarier they can make things sound, the better off they're job security is, and the more government funding they will recieve.

the truth is that YES, sea levels are on the rise, along with everything else concerning global warming. what they dont want you to realize is that it is a naturally occuring phenominon.

we have the same amount of control over global warming that we have over volcano erutions, tsunamis, hurricanes and earthquakes... NONE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

If they want a green tech to take over, no reason to make up BS to do it. All they do is undermine their credibility.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Just like people complain about money being the overriding factor in corporate control of the government, and it is... money is the overriding factor in these studies as well. If Global Warming is subsiding, these groups won't get more money to study it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Vcn8k.png

actually, the article doesn't really address why the 0.3 mm is fictitious. i'd just like to see something more than "it's fake because it's fake, need i go on?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'm pretty sure that's the point. It's an arbitrary number with no factual basis that they enter in the equation to just improve their argument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

that's fine. but when you're going to discredit a study based on a figure you deem "arbitrary with no factual basis", it might help the reader to explain why it's arbitrary with no factual basis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Because it was just added to compensate for the supposed "rising landmass"......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

It's like when you measure your penis and just add an inch to make your lie more impressive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

i get that. but the article doesn't really address why i shouldn't believe in the "rising landmass"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

You have reading comprehension problems obviously. They never disputed that the land masses were rising. The argument exists because the research team is adding .3 to the rising SEA LEVEL per year to COMPENSATE FOR THE RISING LAND MASS, so that their ARGUMENT STILL HOLDS WATER

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Latest Articles

  • Recent Comments