Jump to content

<



Photo
- - - - -

Sonar evidence of crashed UFO(?)


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
38 replies to this topic

#31 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,278
  • Reputation: 1,554
HUDDLER

Posted 09 August 2011 - 07:30 AM

Sigh, no pictures. Surprise..surprise.


?

Posted Image

#32 Cat

Cat

    Terminally bored

  • Joined: 20-May 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,051
  • Reputation: 1,484
HUDDLER

Posted 09 August 2011 - 09:26 AM

Well people believe crazier poo with less evidence.

#33 Inimicus

Inimicus

    Life is better in a kayak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 6,464
  • Reputation: 1,250
SUPPORTER

Posted 09 August 2011 - 09:35 AM

Its cool looking and intriguing but until they put a camera down there for some actual pictures its just another cool rock formation as far as I'm concerned.


Posted Image

#34 HoFBound90

HoFBound90

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 826
  • Reputation: 3
HUDDLER

Posted 09 August 2011 - 09:51 AM

Ya still surprised no one has gone down to investigate if they are so certain they have found something. I mean if true it could be the biggest discovery of the century, if they thought it was something I believe the risk of resources to go down there would be worth it.

#35 blackcatgrowl

blackcatgrowl

    Trolls live here

  • Joined: 06-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,944
  • Reputation: 3
HUDDLER

Posted 09 August 2011 - 02:09 PM

Its cool looking and intriguing but until they put a camera down there for some actual pictures its just another cool rock formation as far as I'm concerned.


Posted Image


It very well could be.

But perfectly round rock formations are fairly rare.

#36 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,278
  • Reputation: 1,554
HUDDLER

Posted 09 August 2011 - 02:13 PM

fwiw I disagree that this formation on sonar is perfectly round...

#37 blackcatgrowl

blackcatgrowl

    Trolls live here

  • Joined: 06-January 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,944
  • Reputation: 3
HUDDLER

Posted 09 August 2011 - 02:19 PM

fwiw I disagree that this formation on sonar is perfectly round...


They address this in the article I linked in the OP:

Lindberg's claim that the object "is perfectly round" may or may not be accurate; while it looks round from the information so far, the resolution of the sonar image was not high enough to verify that it is indeed round. And while the lines that appear to be leading to (or from) the feature may suggest some sort of movement, it's also possible they have nothing to do with the object.



#38 Razzy

Razzy

    Banned

  • Joined: 21-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,053
  • Reputation: 5
HUDDLER

Posted 09 August 2011 - 03:17 PM

Fwiw, to me it looks kind of like a giant pacman. Or a gun turret from a cruiser or destroyer.


That's a possibility I hadn't thought of. There were plenty of Naval operations in the Baltic during WWII, with the German and Fin fleets taking on the Soviets, Poles, etc. It could easily be a portion of a wreck.

#39 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,278
  • Reputation: 1,554
HUDDLER

Posted 09 August 2011 - 05:17 PM

That's a possibility I hadn't thought of. There were plenty of Naval operations in the Baltic during WWII, with the German and Fin fleets taking on the Soviets, Poles, etc. It could easily be a portion of a wreck.


60 feet in diameter would be a big turret... no?

I don't think it is natural, but until we know more I'm not ready to write it off as ET, as much as I want to believe...