http://espn.go.com/n...two-qbr-seasons
Interesting new way to look at QB's. Clausen ranked number 100 only ahead of Jamarcus Russell.
Sidenote: 08' Jake ranked 26, 09' Jake ranked 91.
17 replies to this topic
#3
Grammer
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,371 posts
Troll. Ignore Me.
Posted 06 August 2011 - 01:53 AM
the only one below him, jamarcus russel
#4
mav1234
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 16,377 posts
Senior Member
Posted 06 August 2011 - 01:54 AM
meh, any attempt at making a "do it all stat" is invariably doomed to failure because there is no way to really quantify everything a guy does to a team.
also, that's saying that jake's '08 season was 26th best out of the time span from 08-10. Meh.
also, that's saying that jake's '08 season was 26th best out of the time span from 08-10. Meh.
#5
jtnc
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 13,284 posts
Resident Asshole
- LocationNorth Carolina
Posted 06 August 2011 - 02:06 AM
Sweet jesus.
#6
Mr ocho nueve
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 1,706 posts
Cam can't have my Number
Posted 06 August 2011 - 02:11 AM
Still don't know what to think of this, they said Vick's game vs Was on MNF was the highest single game rating at 99.8 out of a 100.
#7
Tarheels23
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,670 posts
Keep Pounding
Posted 06 August 2011 - 02:31 AM
I wonder where Jake would have rated out at in '04 & '05, which to me was his best two seasons.
#8
carpanfan96
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 11,330 posts
play hard, hit harder
- LocationConcord, NC
Posted 06 August 2011 - 02:43 AM
The reason Jake's 2008 season rates so high is because he was top 3 in Air Yards and Air yards per attempt.
#9
mav1234
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 16,377 posts
Senior Member
Posted 06 August 2011 - 03:06 AM
he probably also had a lot of clutch plays or whatever.
#10
CatMan72
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 14,910 posts
KEEP POUNDING
Posted 06 August 2011 - 05:26 AM
LOL @ Clausen, come on Jimmy don't let Jawalrus do you like that.
Edited by CatMan72, 06 August 2011 - 05:30 AM.
#11
Urrymonster
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 2,264 posts
Senior Member
Posted 06 August 2011 - 07:13 AM
I've noticed an immediate flaw with their rankings. There is a direct significance on the number of plays played and the final score. It seems odd to me that the vast majority of players who played less snaps are also found at the bottom of the rankings.
#12
Zod
-
- MFCEO
-
- 20,084 posts
YOUR RULER
Posted 06 August 2011 - 07:15 AM
Sam Bradford near the bottom....all you need to know.
#13
Happy Panther
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 16,581 posts
Now even funnier.
Posted 06 August 2011 - 08:54 AM
I've noticed an immediate flaw with their rankings. There is a direct significance on the number of plays played and the final score. It seems odd to me that the vast majority of players who played less snaps are also found at the bottom of the rankings.
That sort of makes sense. While not perfect, if your team wins and you were on the field a lot then you probably were key in the victory.
#14
mercules20
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 157 posts
Senior Member
Posted 06 August 2011 - 09:19 AM
yea that ^^^
wtf is your gif supposed to be happy panther?
wtf is your gif supposed to be happy panther?
#15
Gipetto
-
- HUDDLER
-
- 1,300 posts
SWAG SONIC
Posted 06 August 2011 - 09:21 AM
yea that ^^^
wtf is your gif supposed to be happy panther?
:lurk5:
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
