Mr ocho nueve 1 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/6834507/nfl-peyton-manning-top-two-qbr-seasons Interesting new way to look at QB's. Clausen ranked number 100 only ahead of Jamarcus Russell. Sidenote: 08' Jake ranked 26, 09' Jake ranked 91. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CLG 303 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 damn clausen :rofl: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grammer 1 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 the only one below him, jamarcus russel Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mav1234 3,230 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 meh, any attempt at making a "do it all stat" is invariably doomed to failure because there is no way to really quantify everything a guy does to a team. also, that's saying that jake's '08 season was 26th best out of the time span from 08-10. Meh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtnc 3,667 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 Sweet jesus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr ocho nueve 1 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 Still don't know what to think of this, they said Vick's game vs Was on MNF was the highest single game rating at 99.8 out of a 100. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tarheels23 849 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 I wonder where Jake would have rated out at in '04 & '05, which to me was his best two seasons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
carpanfan96 1,651 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 The reason Jake's 2008 season rates so high is because he was top 3 in Air Yards and Air yards per attempt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mav1234 3,230 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 he probably also had a lot of clutch plays or whatever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CatMan72 4,723 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 LOL @ Clausen, come on Jimmy don't let Jawalrus do you like that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Urrymonster 39 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 I've noticed an immediate flaw with their rankings. There is a direct significance on the number of plays played and the final score. It seems odd to me that the vast majority of players who played less snaps are also found at the bottom of the rankings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zod 14,969 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 Sam Bradford near the bottom....all you need to know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Happy Panther 4,321 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 I've noticed an immediate flaw with their rankings. There is a direct significance on the number of plays played and the final score. It seems odd to me that the vast majority of players who played less snaps are also found at the bottom of the rankings. That sort of makes sense. While not perfect, if your team wins and you were on the field a lot then you probably were key in the victory. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mercules20 54 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 yea that ^^^ wtf is your gif supposed to be happy panther? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gipetto 330 Report post Posted August 6, 2011 yea that ^^^ wtf is your gif supposed to be happy panther? :lurk5: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
