Lawson left practice on a crutch
#1
Posted 06 March 2009 - 09:01 PM
#2
Posted 06 March 2009 - 09:49 PM
#3
Posted 06 March 2009 - 10:15 PM
#4
Posted 07 March 2009 - 07:53 AM
#5
Posted 07 March 2009 - 08:50 AM
#6
Posted 07 March 2009 - 10:09 AM
#7
Posted 07 March 2009 - 02:03 PM
he better be fine... if he's not 100% and larry drew plays most of the game... i think we have more turnovers than we have ever had.
Dear God...if we had to depend solely on Larry Drew, we would be royally screwed. This team is done without Lawson.
#8
Posted 07 March 2009 - 02:12 PM
Dear God...if we had to depend solely on Larry Drew, we would be royally screwed. This team is done without Lawson.
See next year.
#9
Posted 07 March 2009 - 02:21 PM
See next year.
negative, we got the number 4 guard in America (Dexter Strickland) and the number 13 guard in America (Leslie McDonald) coming to play for us next year. Good thought though.
#10
Posted 07 March 2009 - 03:00 PM
Edited by monstercat, 07 March 2009 - 03:35 PM.
#11
Posted 07 March 2009 - 03:48 PM
#12
Posted 07 March 2009 - 04:17 PM
See next year.
So players don't get better from year to year? BWAHHHA! Drew could very well be good next year. He's gotten enough time and experience to understand what it's like. Players usually do make the biggest leap from year one to two.
#13
Posted 07 March 2009 - 06:35 PM
http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=3960500
Obviously it isn't a stubbed toe.
#14
Posted 07 March 2009 - 07:33 PM
#15
Posted 07 March 2009 - 08:53 PM
Lack of experience? Ginyard is a fifth year senior, Thompson is a senior, Drew, Davis, Zeller are only going to get better. There is going to be a big dropoff from this year, but no reason what so ever that next years team can't contend for the ACC title.
I was mainly thinking about the point guard position. I'm not convinced yet that Drew can handle it, so Strickland may have to start there if he's able. You're right though, they should still be very good next year.
Anyway, I hope Lawson is OK.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





