Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

The reality of Clausen's good night


  • Please log in to reply
93 replies to this topic

#1 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,302 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:01 PM

Drive 1 - result was a pick 6 on a horrific throw.

Drive 2 - 3 and out. Ending w/ a Clausen sack and Clausen's trademarked horrible play in a NFL pocket.

Drive 4 - another 3 and out.

Drive 5. another 3 and out. - trademarked Clausen pocket play hurting the drive

The highlight of his night

Drive 3 - 2 big plays by Williams. A run and a screen (extension of the ground game). Clausen makes a downfield throw to the endzone....but put the ball behind Olsen who adjusted for a TD grab.


Now this thread isn't purely meant to knock Clausen. Just pointing out the reality he clearly didn't play better than Cam Newton like so many are pimping around a variety of threads. Clausen really didn't do much and was a mixed bag of both good and bad during each of those drives.

this thread isn't a Cam outplayed Clausen thread either as that statement is not being made.

Edited by CRA, 15 August 2011 - 03:16 PM.


#2 ckad79

ckad79

    Enjoy yourself, it's later than you think.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 831 posts
  • LocationRichmond, VA

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:12 PM

Cam Newton had a better night, but I think Clausen looked much improved over last year. As far as the pick goes, I'm not sure if you can put 100% of the blame on him. Still, it happened and fortunately he regained his composure and came back strong with that touchdown to Olsen.

Like I said before, I think this is Cam's team. With the first pick, the team has too much invested in him and Clausen will never overpower that. Clausen just needs to become traid bait and I'm hoping he does... allowing us to get SOMETHING for him. I don't see how anybody wins - the Panthers or Clausen - if he remains a failure.

#3 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,503 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:14 PM

Fwiw, I don't think that Clausen played great by any stretch. But he came back nicely from the int. On a scale of 1-10, he was a 6, Newton was a 5, and Anderson a 7. And they all outperformed all the Giants QB's.

Fwiw, its still early, but I like our Qback situation better now than at this point last year. If Newton can improve his midrange passing/decision making, he has the potential be a real star.

On a somewhat related notie, I liked the comment in the Observer this morning. When Clausen got sacked, it was Clausen's fault. When Newton got sacked, it was the offensive line breaking down.

#4 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Moderators
  • 16,276 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:14 PM

That's why I don't get the few who are still knocking Cam and touting Clausen as being better...

Clausen didn't look much different from last year besides the one scoring drive.

That is still better than what he looked like last year, but he still looked really shaky for the most part.

#5 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,556 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:15 PM

Clausen looked better than last year, but Cam surprisingly, had more awareness than Clausen.

#6 Captain Obvious

Captain Obvious

    "D"

  • ALL-PRO
  • 2,386 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:15 PM

meh. neither one wowed me. Keep working fellas. But Cam seems to have a bigger upside. See I don't hate him :)

#7 Kral

Kral

    Internet Legend

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,934 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:16 PM

So many?

Try one person and he has basically become Gman Was Right or is in fact Gman Was Right with a new schtick.

Edited by Kral, 15 August 2011 - 03:56 PM.


#8 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,992 posts
  • LocationWilmington, NC

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:17 PM

My thoughts as well were that Clausen looked pretty rough, but did bounce back and make a couple of nice plays. I thought the INT was almost completely on Clausen and he did take too long in the pocket on several plays.

Cam wasn't perfect, but I thought he looked better... even under pressure, with his mobility he can escape some. I think the next pre-season game will tell us whether Clausen's play has really improved or not.

#9 blackcatgrowl

blackcatgrowl

    Trolls live here

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,944 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:17 PM

Yeah, I keep reading "Clausen looks good!". People must have been watching a Notre Dame highlight video.

Did he look better than last year? Marginally.

Considering he's the worst QB we've ever had (edit: minimum 4 starts), a marginal improvement isn't a good improvement.

Edited by blackcatgrowl, 15 August 2011 - 05:05 PM.


#10 Cyberjag

Cyberjag

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,692 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:18 PM

Now this thread isn't purely meant to knock Clausen.

:rolleyes:
:icon_bs::icon_bs::icon_bs::icon_bs::icon_bs:

#11 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,302 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:18 PM

When Clausen got sacked, it was Clausen's fault. When Newton got sacked, it was the offensive line breaking down.


There is some truth to that.....not saying it is 100% correct but Clausen has proven he helps defenses out when they pressure.

on the flip side, Cam has a good interntal clock and reacts well to pressure.

Saw examples of that being true for both on Saturday and that was true for both in college.

#12 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,992 posts
  • LocationWilmington, NC

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:21 PM

Considering he's the worst QB we've ever had, a marginal improvement isn't a good improvement.


Come on now... really?

David Carr ring any bells?

#13 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,503 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:21 PM

There is some truth to that.....not saying it is 100% correct but Clausen has proven he helps defenses out when they pressure.

on the flip side, Cam has a good interntal clock and reacts well to pressure.

Saw examples of that being true for both on Saturday and that was true for both in college.


Fwiw, I think they did have the leash on Newton, or he had it on himself. He might be more willing to run as his career progresses, but for now he wants to become a passer, and I think thats a good thing.

#14 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 26,302 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:24 PM

:rolleyes:
:icon_bs::icon_bs::icon_bs::icon_bs::icon_bs:


hey, man...I can compliment the kid and in some aspects I have defended him when few others haven't.

His issues in the pocket create a host of other ones....and the result is bad. He doesn't fit. I feel bad for him. Worst thing to ever happen to him was for Carolina to draft him. We basically put his NFL career and shot at success in the league in a hole he may never get out of.

I don't dislike him anywhere near what you may think. But that is understandable b/c I know how I come off on this topic here.

#15 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,027 posts

Posted 15 August 2011 - 03:26 PM

lol I've never seen CRA have a good thing to say about Clausen... no surprise here...


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com