Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Man made global warming DEBUNKED by CERN.


  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

#1 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,614 posts
  • LocationShallotte, NC

Posted 29 August 2011 - 06:05 PM

New, convincing evidence indicates global warming is caused by cosmic rays and the sun — not humans

The science is now all-but-settled on global warming, convincing new evidence demonstrates, but Al Gore, the IPCC and other global warming doomsayers won’t be celebrating. The new findings point to cosmic rays and the sun — not human activities — as the dominant controller of climate on Earth.

The research, published with little fanfare this week in the prestigious journal Nature, comes from über-prestigious CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, one of the world’s largest centres for scientific research involving 60 countries and 8,000 scientists at more than 600 universities and national laboratories. CERN is the organization that invented the World Wide Web, that built the multi-billion dollar Large Hadron Collider, and that has now built a pristinely clean stainless steel chamber that precisely recreated the Earth’s atmosphere.

In this chamber, 63 CERN scientists from 17 European and American institutes have done what global warming doomsayers said could never be done — demonstrate that cosmic rays promote the formation of molecules that in Earth’s atmosphere can grow and seed clouds, the cloudier and thus cooler it will be. Because the sun’s magnetic field controls how many cosmic rays reach Earth’s atmosphere (the stronger the sun’s magnetic field, the more it shields Earth from incoming cosmic rays from space), the sun determines the temperature on Earth.

The hypothesis that cosmic rays and the sun hold the key to the global warming debate has been Enemy No. 1 to the global warming establishment ever since it was first proposed by two scientists from the Danish Space Research Institute, at a 1996 scientific conference in the U.K. Within one day, the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Bert Bolin, denounced the theory, saying, “I find the move from this pair scientifically extremely naive and irresponsible.” He then set about discrediting the theory, any journalist that gave the theory cre dence, and most of all the Danes presenting the theory — they soon found themselves vilified, marginalized and starved of funding, despite their impeccable scientific credentials.

The mobilization to rally the press against the Danes worked brilliantly, with one notable exception. Nigel Calder, a former editor of The New Scientist who attended that 1996 conference, would not be cowed. Himself a physicist, Mr. Calder became convinced of the merits of the argument and a year later, following a lecture he gave at a CERN conference, so too did Jasper Kirkby, a CERN scientist in attendance. Mr. Kirkby then convinced the CERN bureaucracy of the theory’s importance and developed a plan to create a cloud chamber — he called it CLOUD, for “Cosmics Leaving OUtdoor Droplets.”

But Mr. Kirkby made the same tactical error that the Danes had — not realizing how politicized the global warming issue was, he candidly shared his views with the scientific community.

“The theory will probably be able to account for somewhere between a half and the whole of the increase in the Earth’s temperature that we have seen in the last century,” Mr. Kirkby told the scientific press in 1998, explaining that global warming may be part of a natural cycle in the Earth’s temperature.


Continued

Looks like I was right all along.

#2 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,000 posts

Posted 29 August 2011 - 06:06 PM

in before al gore internet jokes.

#3 venom

venom

    oneinfiniteconsciousness

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,853 posts
  • LocationPleiades

Posted 29 August 2011 - 06:27 PM

Yep...the concept of man-made global warming is a total farce. Yes, Earth is experiencing global warming, but it is due to activity from the sun. All of the planets in our solar system have been "charging up" over the past 40 years or so. They are becoming brighter, hotter and more magnetically significant.

Neptune has become 40% brighter since '82; Pluto has had an atmospheric preassure increase of 300% since '89, wth a 700% increase in earthquakes since '73; Saturn's Plasma Torus has experienced an increase of 1000%, while also getting brighter and hotter; Uranus has been growing clouds for the first time ever, and has been turning blue since '04; Venus' atmosphere has been converting to oxygen based, while sulfer has been decreasing dramatically, especially so between '78 and '83; Mars is growing clouds as well and has endured an unexpected 200% increase in the density of its atmosphere; Jupiter has become hotter by 18 degrees fahrenheit, experiencing massive "Red Storms," while "heavy metals" in its atmosphere has been decreasing, with a stunning 10% between '79 and '95; the surface level of Jupiter's moon, Io, has become over 200% hotter than it was 30 years ago. I could go on...

Major changes are taking place in our solar system, in which all of the planets are experiencing global warming/climate change. We are not the only ones, and it sure as hell isnt due to man-made co2.

Edited by venom, 29 August 2011 - 06:49 PM.


#4 King

King

    A Cell of Awareness

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,761 posts

Posted 29 August 2011 - 07:10 PM

inb4 the greens on this board immediately Google "cern ties to industry."

#5 natty

natty

    Senior Member

  • ALL-PRO
  • 4,747 posts

Posted 29 August 2011 - 07:12 PM

I'm glad venom commented on this. We needed an expert opinion.

#6 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,861 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 29 August 2011 - 07:13 PM

CERN stands for Citgo and Exxon's Rich Naysayers

#7 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,861 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 29 August 2011 - 07:14 PM

got a better source?

2lazy2google

#8 blackcatgrowl

blackcatgrowl

    Trolls live here

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,944 posts

Posted 29 August 2011 - 07:17 PM

CERN stands for Citgo and Exxon's Rich Naysayers


Yeah, CERN is obviously not concerned about the well being of our planet. On top of this news, they are trying to destroy Earth with a black hole!!!



:willy_nilly:

just kidding!

Edited by blackcatgrowl, 29 August 2011 - 07:20 PM.


#9 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,861 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 29 August 2011 - 07:22 PM

Yeah, CERN is obviously not concerned about the well being of our planet. On top of this news, they are trying to destroy Earth with a black hole!!!



:willy_nilly:

just kidding!



The only reason they didn't make a black hole was they couldn't figure out how to make billions of dollars off of it.

#10 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,715 posts

Posted 29 August 2011 - 07:25 PM

Drill baby drill!!!!

#11 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,715 posts

Posted 29 August 2011 - 07:39 PM

http://www.foxnews.c...eates-14-posts/

#12 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,614 posts
  • LocationShallotte, NC

Posted 29 August 2011 - 07:59 PM

got a better source?

2lazy2google


While there is nothing wrong with the original link here's a link to the "Nature" article where they published their findings, of course you can't see the full report without a "Nature" subscription.

http://www.nature.co...ature10343.html

#13 King

King

    A Cell of Awareness

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,761 posts

Posted 29 August 2011 - 08:16 PM

I get free access to Nature with my N.C. State library account.

Send me a PM with your email if anyone wants the full article.

#14 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,666 posts

Posted 29 August 2011 - 08:24 PM

While I do appreciate the annual "this is the scandal that disproves global warming" because it gets right wingers to actually read about science briefly... like climategate and all the rest, this has already been debunked.

Galactic cosmic rays influencing cloud nucleation is already accepted science and has been accounted for in the global warming model, long before this study. It has also been noted that periods of increased galactic cosmic ray activity do not correspond to climate. Many of the warmest periods on the Earth are during markedly low activity levels for cosmic rays.

In fact the publisher of this study said flat out that the study does not indicate a link between increased cosmic ray activity and climate.

Does any of this matter? Nope. Because the same thing that always happens will happen again. This isn't a case of CERN being funded by oil or whatever the fug you guys sarcastically said. It's a case of some yahoos seeing that a study said "cosmic rays... clouds... earth..." and going "OMFG COSMIC RAYS DO GLOBAL WARMING WHATEVER THAT IS, THIS PROVES IT"

Step 1: People misunderstand some science.
Step 2: They're shown how they are incorrect.
Step 3: They ignore that part.
Step 4: Continue to cite their incorrect understanding of the science as proof of their incorrect belief.

Here is a source that goes way more in depth than I can, but I know you won't read it.

#15 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,092 posts

Posted 29 August 2011 - 08:29 PM

in before the "But Global Climate Change is JUST A THEORY so we should compare it to the "God is pissed at us!" theory" or else it isn't scientific


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com