Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Aaron Curry


  • Please log in to reply
203 replies to this topic

#136 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,587 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 28 September 2011 - 07:47 PM

I'd gladly trade straight up Curry for Clausen.

#137 BBQ&Beer

BBQ&Beer

    The good actor

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,965 posts
  • LocationMissouri

Posted 28 September 2011 - 07:57 PM

Well... The hawks drive a hard bargain, but a pick & Curry for Clausen might just be something we have to live with... (giggity)

#138 jramsey4

jramsey4

    "Blisters on me Fingers"

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,479 posts

Posted 28 September 2011 - 08:14 PM

Clausen for Curry straight up = No Brainer

I'd rather Anderson take over if Newton went down and I'd rather Edwards play at QB then ever see Clausen on the field.

#139 chubs2496

chubs2496

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,185 posts

Posted 28 September 2011 - 08:24 PM

Guys what your gut feeling of us getting him. Do u think we are the front runner to get him?

#140 Chaos

Chaos

    @chaos_cltsports

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,847 posts

Posted 28 September 2011 - 08:26 PM

trading a boring pickle for spicy indian sauce....why the fug not?

#141 La Pantera

La Pantera

    humpin' habanero

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,613 posts

Posted 28 September 2011 - 08:31 PM

Guys what your gut feeling of us getting him. Do u think we are the front runner to get him?


Makes a lot of sense to trade for Curry. Soooo....it won't happen!

Edited by La Pantera, 28 September 2011 - 08:34 PM.


#142 chubs2496

chubs2496

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,185 posts

Posted 28 September 2011 - 08:34 PM

Makes a lot of sense to trade for Curry soooo....it won't happen!


Haha yeah I know what u mean. It seems like we go after players that make no sense, But the ones that seem like no brainers they stay away from. Although Idk If this is a no brainer. Buy what's it gonna hurt. He could come here and be a real compliment to Anderson and beason

#143 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,239 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 08:17 AM

If we could trade Clausen for Curry and ANY pick I'd do a backflip...or at least roll over backwards.

#144 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,965 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 08:21 AM

IMO he doesn't really fit this defense....he should be looking to go to a 3-4 team.

#145 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,239 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 08:23 AM

I'd like him in our 4-3 defense :)

#146 pantherfan49

pantherfan49

    Angry inventor

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,342 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 09:10 AM

This bust in Seattle had 73 tackles and 3.5 sacks last year. He also forced 2 fumbles. To put that into perspective, that would have tied him for 2nd on the Panthers last season in forced fumbles and sacks, and fourth in tackles.

I don't think a team short on Linebackers and having 2 catastrophic injuries to 2 of their starters can not be looking into picking Curry up. Folks, face it, Thomas Davis is done in the NFL. Jon Beason will be back, but may lose a step. Anderson is solid at one LBer spot (but is probably best suited as a WLB). Connor is very good as a 2 down LB in the middle, but he does have an injury history and an expiring contract. Point is that the Panthers are short on starting quality linebackers. This might be your chance to pick up a quality player for cheap at the SLB position.

And if Curry could be had for Clausen, trade pickles right the fug now. I know Hurney probably wants to save face after blowing early round picks in each of the past three seasons, but Clausen has no future in a Chud offense. We all know that.

#147 chubs2496

chubs2496

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,185 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 09:49 AM

This bust in Seattle had 73 tackles and 3.5 sacks last year. He also forced 2 fumbles. To put that into perspective, that would have tied him for 2nd on the Panthers last season in forced fumbles and sacks, and fourth in tackles.

I don't think a team short on Linebackers and having 2 catastrophic injuries to 2 of their starters can not be looking into picking Curry up. Folks, face it, Thomas Davis is done in the NFL. Jon Beason will be back, but may lose a step. Anderson is solid at one LBer spot (but is probably best suited as a WLB). Connor is very good as a 2 down LB in the middle, but he does have an injury history and an expiring contract. Point is that the Panthers are short on starting quality linebackers. This might be your chance to pick up a quality player for cheap at the SLB position.

And if Curry could be had for Clausen, trade pickles right the fug now. I know Hurney probably wants to save face after blowing early round picks in each of the past three seasons, but Clausen has no future in a Chud offense. We all know that.


u make a very good point about his stats compared to the our defense.
I think people call him a bust bc he didn't live u to 4th overall pick porential. People was expecting 170 tackles and 8 sacks. But he could be a great pick up an possibly could put numbers like that one day in this defense.

#148 4Corners

4Corners

    suck me beautiful

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,034 posts
  • Location704

Posted 29 September 2011 - 09:51 AM

I don't think Curry is a bust, but he is a HUGE liability in coverage.

If he struggles in the NFC west, he would get torched in the NFC South.

#149 pantherfan49

pantherfan49

    Angry inventor

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,342 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 10:01 AM

u make a very good point about his stats compared to the our defense.
I think people call him a bust bc he didn't live u to 4th overall pick porential. People was expecting 170 tackles and 8 sacks. But he could be a great pick up an possibly could put numbers like that one day in this defense.


Well he is a LB that fits only in a certain defense. You shouldn't expect 170 tackles out of most strong side linebackers being asked to play at the LOS in the NFL. In a lot of ways, he is similar to Dan Connor in that he is a very solid player that will have to play in the right scheme. If you remember, Connor was expected to be a first round pick but slid because of scheme-related concerns. Curry was the 4th pick in that draft because of the overall weakness in that draft. His stats absolutely dwarf other players taken around him such as Tyson Jackson, Aaron Maybin (official bust), Heyward Bay, etc.

#150 pantherfan49

pantherfan49

    Angry inventor

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,342 posts

Posted 29 September 2011 - 10:05 AM

I don't think Curry is a bust, but he is a HUGE liability in coverage.

If he struggles in the NFC west, he would get torched in the NFC South.


So is Dan Connor. Hell, Thomas Davis, a converted safety was much better in the box than he was in coverage. Just don't leave Curry out in space. Play him on the strong side and let him clean up in the running game on first and second downs.

A starting LB crew next year of Curry, Beas, and Anderson would be very formidable.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com