GOP debate tonight
#1
Posted 22 September 2011 - 11:02 PM
#2
Posted 22 September 2011 - 11:05 PM
Lemme tell yuh bout my 9-9-9 plan, tho.
#3
Posted 22 September 2011 - 11:41 PM
Seriously though, I think that Rick Perry came out of that looking like a dipshit. Romney pwned him several times and when he was talking about stopping immigration he just looked like an ass. He ran the state that has the gaping hole that all of the illegals have escaped through, yet he claims he knows how to stop them from getting in. If he could stop them from getting in, why hasn't he already?
#4
Posted 22 September 2011 - 11:56 PM
The audience just booed a soldier who asked a question because he's gay. A US soldier, active duty, serving in Iraq, risking his life. Booed him.
Not as bad as Santorum's answer and the reaction after that
#5
Posted 23 September 2011 - 12:53 AM
Huntsman & Cain were decent
#6
Posted 23 September 2011 - 03:13 AM
Anyhow, Cain is the best of these candidates but he won't make it. If Romney(who will get the nom) has any sense he will pick Cain as his VP.
#7
Posted 23 September 2011 - 05:12 AM
Not as bad as Santorum's answer and the reaction after that
what, are you telling me that repealing DADT doesn't create a special privilege for gay people? nice try, george soros.
#8
Posted 23 September 2011 - 05:14 AM
#9
Posted 23 September 2011 - 05:38 AM
9-9-9 is 666 upside down. Herman is the antichrist.
Seriously though, I think that Rick Perry came out of that looking like a dippoo. Romney pwned him several times and when he was talking about stopping immigration he just looked like an ass. He ran the state that has the gaping hole that all of the illegals have escaped through, yet he claims he knows how to stop them from getting in. If he could stop them from getting in, why hasn't he already?
So if Texas enforces the FEDERAL law, will they soon be in court facing Obama's lawyers?
#10
Posted 23 September 2011 - 08:20 AM
Rick Perry is as empty a suit as Obama. Do not want any part of another guy with "TV" appeal, but no idea how to solve problems.''
As a conservative, I think Gingrich is very knowledgeable, but not appealing to the masses.
Huntsman is more appealing but has a few areas which trouble conservatives.
Cain will have to overcome the trust factor. He did move up last night however
Romney is now the frontrunner and if he can explain "romneycare" sufficiently to the voters, might have a chance.
The rest are fodder. Paul is extremely appealing on some issues and extremely scary on others.
#11
Posted 23 September 2011 - 08:28 AM
right on cue, Rodeo posts his "repubs are homophobes" thread. I dont remember this thunderous chorus of boos, so i go to youtube and several of the same type posts are there and are now not available.
what gives?
#12
Posted 23 September 2011 - 11:10 AM
#13
Posted 23 September 2011 - 11:39 AM
They guys could have been booing about the question itself, but I doubt it.
But these are the types of people these candidates are pandering to at the moment - I will tell you that at least 80 percent of the audience there had some kind of sympathy towards the booers and their views but would not openly criticize a member of the military, in part because they remember when only Tree Hugging Commie Dems would do such a thing.
#14
Posted 23 September 2011 - 12:13 PM
http://www.foxnews.c...ntcmp=obnetwork
#15
Posted 23 September 2011 - 12:14 PM
Why would the right wing Foxnews even allow such a question?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





