Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Uh oh


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 Murph

Murph

    Joe Cool

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,886 posts
  • LocationRound about here

Posted 26 March 2009 - 07:42 AM

:leaving:


http://www.foxnews.c...ilitia-members/

#2 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,560 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 26 March 2009 - 08:06 AM

I heard about this last week. I knew those were black helicopters over my house.

#3 Panthers_Lover

Panthers_Lover

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,032 posts
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC

Posted 26 March 2009 - 08:50 AM

This from the people who don't want to call actual terrorists "terrorists" ... oh my god ...

#4 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,793 posts

Posted 26 March 2009 - 09:51 AM

Yes, the Missouri Department of Homeland Security, which was created by communists.

#5 natty

natty

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,731 posts

Posted 26 March 2009 - 10:53 AM

Posted Image

^^^ Obvious symbol of terrorism

Didn't you have that as an avatar Jase? I got my eye on you....

#6 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,560 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 26 March 2009 - 10:54 AM

:leaving:

#7 dimbee

dimbee

    Rabble Rouser

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,884 posts

Posted 26 March 2009 - 11:09 AM

Thank goodness I'm stocked up on aluminum foil

#8 Panthers_Lover

Panthers_Lover

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,032 posts
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC

Posted 26 March 2009 - 12:54 PM

Yes, the Missouri Department of Homeland Security, which was created by communists.


Actually, it's the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ... and yes, I read that this initiative has been in operation for several years. I also read that Napolitano thinks it's a fabulous idea and will keep it going. She's the one, though, who does not acknowledge "terrorists."

#9 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,983 posts

Posted 26 March 2009 - 01:07 PM

Actually, it's the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ... and yes, I read that this initiative has been in operation for several years. I also read that Napolitano thinks it's a fabulous idea and will keep it going. She's the one, though, who does not acknowledge "terrorists."


If we can't call them terrorists, can we call them Fizzies?

#10 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,560 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 26 March 2009 - 01:16 PM

<<< Oh noes it's bak!!! (Couldn't find the grayed out version.)


When they black bag me I want you all to know... epi was my favorite.

#11 StepandFetch

StepandFetch

    ............chicken wire?

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 885 posts

Posted 26 March 2009 - 01:37 PM

constitution's about to burst into flames lol

#12 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,393 posts

Posted 26 March 2009 - 01:43 PM

constitution's about to burst into flames lol


constitution says you can only have guns if you're in a militia. so seems like you would like them broadening the definition of militias so more people can have guns.

#13 Murph

Murph

    Joe Cool

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,886 posts
  • LocationRound about here

Posted 26 March 2009 - 01:46 PM

constitution says you can only have guns if you're in a militia. so seems like you would like them broadening the definition of militias so more people can have guns.


The supreme court completely shot down that assumption last year and gave an interpretation of the 2nd amendment means.

#14 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,393 posts

Posted 26 March 2009 - 01:47 PM

who cares what a bunch of activist judges say

#15 StepandFetch

StepandFetch

    ............chicken wire?

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 885 posts

Posted 27 March 2009 - 01:17 AM

constitution says you can only have guns if you're in a militia. so seems like you would like them broadening the definition of militias so more people can have guns.


no, the US Constitution states:" A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

YOU can translate the second amendment that way, or any way you like..regardless... the Supreme Court currently sees things a little bit differently, as it has left the overall translation to each state- each state may be as restrictive as it wishes regarding the regulation of firearms- and currently, I can legally own weapons in our state, militia or no militia.

and honestly, I'm not worried about the 2nd Amendment nearly as much as the GIVE Act.....:puke::leaving:


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.