Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Postal Service reports massive $5 billion loss


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
109 replies to this topic

#31 Mvp2014

Mvp2014

    Phenom

  • Joined: 06-October 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,897
  • Reputation: 331
HUDDLER

Posted 16 November 2011 - 09:29 AM

Neither UPS nor Fed Ex make a stop at EVERY residential address and most business addresses 6 days a week.

Apples and oranges...


Good point.

#32 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,073
  • Reputation: 1,997
HUDDLER

Posted 16 November 2011 - 09:42 AM

I would say that 3/4 of the mail delivered is "junk mail" and sales papers and such. USPS does not charge enough for the bulk mail as it too has to go to every household just to be trashed.

The whole system needs to be re evaluated. I can have "junk" calls stopped from coming into my home, why not "junk" mail? Would the gov be better off spending money to help consumers learn about paperless systems rather than propping up a dinosaur which is sucking money out of the taxpayer.

Immediately stop the advertisements of the USPS. Love the fact that they spend money on tv ads promoting a product that loses tons of money. The more they sell, the more we lose.

#33 Carolina Husker

Carolina Husker

    I hate football

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,530
  • Reputation: 393
HUDDLER

Posted 16 November 2011 - 10:04 AM

So basically the only reason we have at this point to continue with the UPS is to send people jury summons less expensively?

#34 pantherfan49

pantherfan49

    Angry inventor

  • Joined: 02-December 08
  • posts: 5,565
  • Reputation: 166
SUPPORTER

Posted 16 November 2011 - 10:33 AM

The Postal Service could jack up their prices the same way a private company would have to.


Except that the postal service relies on economies of scale that require a certain volume of mail. Increase prices, volume goes down, postal service goes further in the shitter.

I think the post office is just one of those services that government provides that we are just going to lose money on. Simple as that.

#35 Inimicus

Inimicus

    Life is better in a kayak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 6,423
  • Reputation: 1,212
SUPPORTER

Posted 16 November 2011 - 10:38 AM

Except that the postal service relies on economies of scale that require a certain volume of mail. Increase prices, volume goes down, postal service goes further in the shitter.

I think the post office is just one of those services that government provides that we are just going to lose money on. Simple as that.

But we could lose less.

Reduce the number of delivery days and increase the cost (slightly ~.01/pc) on bulk mail.

That would go a long way towards reducing the losses.

#36 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • Joined: 08-December 08
  • posts: 7,419
  • Reputation: 5,441
SUPPORTER

Posted 16 November 2011 - 01:34 PM

Kramer went the 'no mail' route, and he ended up with a potato sack over his head in a back room somewhere. Not me man. No way. Bring on the Bed Bath & Pizza coupons!

#37 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 21,318
  • Reputation: 17,533
HUDDLER

Posted 16 November 2011 - 01:40 PM

Wilford Brimmley was going to kick Kramers ass but the diabeetus and Karmer's remorse stopped him cold.

#38 pantherfan49

pantherfan49

    Angry inventor

  • Joined: 02-December 08
  • posts: 5,565
  • Reputation: 166
SUPPORTER

Posted 16 November 2011 - 02:09 PM

But we could lose less.

Reduce the number of delivery days and increase the cost (slightly ~.01/pc) on bulk mail.

That would go a long way towards reducing the losses.


Yeah I understand that entirely. A close friend is a higher up with the post office and agrees entirely with your plan of action.

Unfortunately, a certain group is standing in the way. Any guesses who?

#39 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,920
  • Reputation: 5,441
HUDDLER

Posted 16 November 2011 - 02:18 PM

But we could lose less.

Reduce the number of delivery days and increase the cost (slightly ~.01/pc) on bulk mail.

That would go a long way towards reducing the losses.


Won't work, the gov't will just keep the same number of employees and only have them work 3 days a week.

Cut the delivery days to 3...stagger them in areas so you can have carriers working different routes on different days.

#40 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,874
  • Reputation: 5,780
Moderators

Posted 16 November 2011 - 02:22 PM

Basically they can run it like garbage pickup except 4x a weeks