#1
Posted 05 April 2012 - 02:53 AM
The latter seems more likely since it is doubtful that Claiborne will fall to us and the experts seem to think no other corner is worthy of that pick. The pass rush class seems to be stacked with just pass top ten level talent. What do you guys think?
#2
Posted 05 April 2012 - 02:55 AM
#3
Posted 05 April 2012 - 02:58 AM
#4
Posted 05 April 2012 - 02:59 AM
Well, we are crowded at the CB position. The Safety position is now legitimately fixed. One of those safeties will emerge and take charge.
Crowded but only 2-3 should be on the 53 man roster at this point.
#5
Posted 05 April 2012 - 03:23 AM
#6
Posted 05 April 2012 - 07:11 AM
From who we have brought in and interviewed (I know we do not know the complete list) It seems that we are interested in drafting LB, WR, DL.
I have not seen much at CB interviewed--I think we talked to Dwight Bently, a smallish (179 lb) small school player who could fall to fourth. I am thinking they like Hogan and they want to build the pass rush first, which makes sense.
At DE, have they decided Hardy is not the answer? What about Keiser, who had 4 sacks in limited playing time? Can they get more pass rush out of Applewhite? I think we address DE, but not if we don't do it in rounds 1 or 2.
At DT, the prospects are a bit questionable to warrant the 9th pick. They are either workout warriors, one-hit wonders, or very raw. We get Edwards added to the mix and our 4 first year players (Shirley, Kearse, Fua, and McClain) will be much improved. I am not sold on the fact that we address DT, but if we do, it could be a late rounder like that kid from Canada or Martin from Michigan.
I think we are going WR or LB early. Most people think we are set at WR. That is wishful thinking--regardless, we seem to be interested in WRs.
Michael Floyd or Luke Kuechley--Possibly a Coples or Ingram--it is really hard to tell.
#7
Posted 05 April 2012 - 08:41 AM
Just while we're listing possibilities. Not every single thing to do with the team right now must mean something about the draft.
#8
Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:27 AM
#9
Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:31 AM
We seem to be addressing OL and S in free agency. Rather typical of Hurney.
From who we have brought in and interviewed (I know we do not know the complete list) It seems that we are interested in drafting LB, WR, DL.
I have not seen much at CB interviewed--I think we talked to Dwight Bently, a smallish (179 lb) small school player who could fall to fourth. I am thinking they like Hogan and they want to build the pass rush first, which makes sense.
At DE, have they decided Hardy is not the answer? What about Keiser, who had 4 sacks in limited playing time? Can they get more pass rush out of Applewhite? I think we address DE, but not if we don't do it in rounds 1 or 2.
At DT, the prospects are a bit questionable to warrant the 9th pick. They are either workout warriors, one-hit wonders, or very raw. We get Edwards added to the mix and our 4 first year players (Shirley, Kearse, Fua, and McClain) will be much improved. I am not sold on the fact that we address DT, but if we do, it could be a late rounder like that kid from Canada or Martin from Michigan.
I think we are going WR or LB early. Most people think we are set at WR. That is wishful thinking--regardless, we seem to be interested in WRs.
Michael Floyd or Luke Kuechley--Possibly a Coples or Ingram--it is really hard to tell.
Thank you for saying this, it is the point that I was trying to express. Raw is the perfect word to describe the projected top defensive tackles in the draft.
#10
Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:33 AM
Anticipating the draft is like planning a wedding...too much work for not nearly enough excitement.
#11
Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:55 AM
People seem to get upset at the potential Luke Kuechley pick. I for one, am excited.
We need a linebacker. Beason is hurting and will struggle this year. If Davis comes back he should change his name to Jesus...
#12
Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:27 AM
#13
Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:38 AM
Thank you for saying this, it is the point that I was trying to express. Raw is the perfect word to describe the projected top defensive tackles in the draft.
We could trade back, but why draft players (and sign free agents) and then not give them time to develop? You are right, in my opinion.
#14
Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:40 AM
I'm at the point where they're going to go BPA, and hopefully it's Tannehill, that way we can trade down and get maybe two late first or a late first and early 2nd, i mean something like that, where then we could get the best DT and DE available, take the best CB/LB in the 2nd, grab a TE in the 3rd.
There's no way the Browns pass on Tannehill.
Sure they can get Blackmon/Floyd to give McCoy a weapon, but then they'd still be stuck with McCoy.
#15
Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:41 AM
For the rest of the draft, I think we'll be looking to add depth at LB, OL, and looking for immediate impact special teamers who could possibly develop into more (especially a returner).
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Safety, DB, Defensive Back
Football →
The NFL Draft →
George Iloka, Safety, Boise StateStarted by Jase, 01 Apr 2012 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





