Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Hypothetical Trade


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

Poll: Hypothetical Trade (66 member(s) have cast votes)

How willing would you pursue a trade like this?

  1. Very Willing (26 votes [39.39%])

    Percentage of vote: 39.39%

  2. Somewhat Willing (15 votes [22.73%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.73%

  3. Unsure (6 votes [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  4. Not too willing (11 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

  5. Not willing at all (8 votes [12.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.12%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Johnny Kilroy

Johnny Kilroy

    Kilroy Kicks Butt

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,648 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:46 AM

Would you guys trade down out of our 9th pick and pick up 2 first rounders and a 3rd but lose our 2nd rounder?

Not saying this is going to happen, just wanted to get your philosophy on this trade.

#2 NCstoner420

NCstoner420

    Dave's not here man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,386 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:50 AM

Is it a first this year?

#3 FutureDynasty

FutureDynasty

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 352 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:51 AM

can we get a worthless thread option??? because that's what i would choose. B)

#4 SOJA

SOJA

    Official Panthers Fan

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,893 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:51 AM

if we could score Fletcher Cox and Janoris Jenkins yes.

#5 Johnny Kilroy

Johnny Kilroy

    Kilroy Kicks Butt

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,648 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:51 AM

Yeah we'd trade our 9 and our 2nd for 2 lower firsts and a 3rd.

#6 NCstoner420

NCstoner420

    Dave's not here man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,386 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:55 AM

Yeah we'd trade our 9 and our 2nd for 2 lower firsts and a 3rd.


So 9 and 40 for 27, 31, and 93? I would

#7 Panther17

Panther17

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,910 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:56 AM

I voted somewhat willing depending on who is available at the time of number 9 pick. If it's Claiborne, I'm not sure I'm doing the trade instead of picking him.

#8 Doyle

Doyle

    Headed to the county line

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,148 posts
  • LocationRiverboat Rivera

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:00 AM

Someone else brought this up and I think it is a good trade senario. I'd say yes. The Bengals are in a position to do this at 17 and 21.

#9 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 23,960 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:03 AM

Would you guys trade down out of our 9th pick and pick up 2 first rounders and a 3rd but lose our 2nd rounder?

Not saying this is going to happen, just wanted to get your philosophy on this trade.


Even trade Our 1st for 2 1sts this year.

Leave the other picks out of it. You are basically giving a 2nd for a 3rd. It does nothing.

#10 CarolinaNCSU

CarolinaNCSU

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,158 posts
  • LocationRaleigh

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:03 AM

If it's the Bengals, no question. If it's the Patriots, maybe probably.

#11 Lout

Lout

    Draft Guru

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,420 posts
  • LocationTulsa, OK

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:04 AM

I depends on the draft position.. you can't answer this question without having more information.

#12 Johnny Kilroy

Johnny Kilroy

    Kilroy Kicks Butt

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,648 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:04 AM

Even trade Our 1st for 2 1sts this year.

Leave the other picks out of it. You are basically giving a 2nd for a 3rd. It does nothing.


Sure it does consider we have a high 2nd and we'd be getting a mid to low 3rd rounder.

#13 Johnny Kilroy

Johnny Kilroy

    Kilroy Kicks Butt

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,648 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:06 AM

I depends on the draft position.. you can't answer this question without having more information.


Clearly, but use your best judgement based on what players are going to be there. I think many would pass on this if Claiborne was there. But I think in any other situation I'd trade down, that's just me though.

#14 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Moderators
  • 23,960 posts

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:06 AM

So we are getting a low 3rd for a high second. I would run from this.

#15 Panther53521

Panther53521

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 761 posts
  • LocationHickory, NC

Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:07 AM

I would prefer to keep our 2nd round pick. Anyone moving up to 9th needs to play a big price. 2 first and a third sounds good to me.

Atlanta gave up 2 1st a 3rd and 2 4ths for the 6th pick


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com