Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

hdevonxz

Can someone explain this to me.

33 posts in this topic

I think my big problem with over-taxation of the rich is what gives the government (who didn't earn one cent of that fortune) the right to waste it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're not going to find many "working class joes" that are excited about the government taking ANY money.

I can't imagine historically any other entity that wastes as much money as the US govt does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wife had to get passport today...3 post offices later...one gov worker tried to turn her away for a NON-vital record birth certificate. Wife was smart enough to tell her how to do her job and point to the raised seal on the document.

Yeah...government...the epitome of efficiency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're not going to find many "working class joes" that are excited about the government taking ANY money.

Yeah, that's what I don't get. This dude was so concerned about taxing the rich, when he has no chance of being rich.

Kinda like the whole Joe sixpack dilemma.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think my big problem with over-taxation of the rich is what gives the government (who didn't earn one cent of that fortune) the right to waste it.

The other problem with over taxing the upper class is that all to often these members of society dictate the costs of goods and services. To spare the economics lesson, we end up paying the upperclass's tax increase.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think "the rich" are paying a lot in taxes, you're not paying attention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think "the rich" are paying a lot in taxes, you're not paying attention.

That depends on whether you mean rich as in income or rich as in accumulated wealth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're main income is a paycheck, you ain't rich.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think "the rich" are paying a lot in taxes, you're not paying attention.

No, I don't think that. People scream "tax the rich", but they don't grasp what happens when that concept is applied. The "rich" hide their money in investments, charitable donations and lots of other tax deductions that brings their gross adjusted income down a tax bracket or 3. Even if we could get the "rich" to pay more, people like you and me would end up paying the increase in taxes because the "rich would force an increase to goods and services to recoup some of their lost earnings

This is why I believe in a flat tax.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're main income is a paycheck, you ain't rich.

That skirts my question. Income is income to the IRS whether its a paycheck or not.

My question was whether you meant income rich ( the way the government determines tax brackets) or accumulated wealth rich ( people who inherited large sums of money and have most of it tax sheltered ( the truly rich)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With rivera thinking defense would win mentality..they thought Cam would be enough him and Smitty and double trouble...didn't work that way..this is a passing league and you have to adjust..front 7 is nice but if the team is getting ball out quick it negates it.Our offense in the SB was slow and line not good on the right side..After loosing Smity we had no true threat...Benjamin is good but is slow. Ginn and Brown weak and small..they are no smity ..If Steve were here we would have had a 2015 SB. Imagine Smitty in Browns place during SB...the organization took a turn for worst on offense should have gotten a  replacement benji was not it or was not enough.
    • So you answer a question with a question? Have no opinion?  Scared to guess?
    • correct. herbert spencer's concept (falsely attributed to darwin) was used heavily throughout the late 19th century to add a scientific justification for things like child labor and opposing evils such as regulations. some people were meant to be poor! it is a sure sign someone has no empathy and shouldn't be a viable voice in putting together a society that works for everyone because it is inherently anti-social.