Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Hurney developing a bad..

39 posts in this topic

Posted

...reputation among league GMs. The genie got let out of the bottle with the Williams and Johnson contracts. DWills deal took the top off the Peterson/Johnson negotiations and CJ contract influenced Avril's reluctance tosign long term. Now the top 8 picks (ex RGIII)are sitting out waiting for the offset language to disappear after Hurney gave in months ago.

Marty may be sitting at his own table for the next GM conference with a placemat for Mr. "F**king" Marty Hurney.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Who cares? Hurney's job is to field the best team he can for the Carolina Panthers. I don't give a damn what other GMs think of him.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Oh well, fug'em. That's their problem.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

oh no! what are we gonna do batman?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Who cares? Hurney's job is to field the best team he can for the Carolina Panthers. I don't give a damn what other GMs think of him.

he has not yet field the best team for the panthers, but i do like that when a deal needs to be done Hurn-dog gets errr dune.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If anyone on the team or in the organization is disliked for being a jackhole, that's a negative.

If they're disliked for doing their job in such a way as to make it tough for others, that doesn't really bother me.

What's the source on this anyway?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

"sources" Lofl

My source says this thread sucks balls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If anyone on the team or in the organization is disliked for being a jackhole, that's a negative.

If they're disliked for doing their job in such a way as to make it tough for others, that doesn't really bother me.

What's the source on this anyway?

Source: Other huddler pretend told-you so-after the fact- Gms. Soon to be a Bleacher report article!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Source: Other huddler pretend told-you so-after the fact- Gms. Soon to be a Bleacher report article!!

It may well be legit, but I've never seen anything about it and there's no citation. I'd just like to know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I think that

the thread starter is just making stuff up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I can't disagree with what the OP is saying. I mean look at what we have done the last few years, we set the bar for players across the league, I remember when we signed DWILL and Gore and Forte wanted that kind of money. Even when we signed CJ, you don't think players were like, Im better than CJ, so I think i deserve more money than him. Or when we locked up Godfrey, I remember Weddle wanting a bigger contract than him. We sign our 9th pick in the 1st round and teams are like "no offset language", and now they got to battle agents for other draftees about getting a deal like Luke. But at the same time, I don't think GM's are upset, and if they are FUG them...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites